Table 4.
Costs, benefits, and feasibility estimations for struvite chemical precipitation, utilisation of saline water and sand as auto-nucleation media in combination with chemical precipitation and Ostara controlled struvite recovery reactor.
| Mean (€ year/L) | |
|---|---|
| Chemical precipitation of struvite | |
| General WWTP operation and maintenance cost including chemical requirements. | 43,365,650 |
| Chemical cost requirements. | 20,643,939 |
| Water sale. | 12,484,533 |
| Struvite sale. | 6,812,500 |
| Savings regarding struvite precipitation. | 83,367 |
| Environmental benefits. |
71,215,150 |
|
Chemical precipitation in combination with saline water and sand usage | |
| General WWTP operation and maintenance. | 39,462,741.2 |
| Struvite sale. | 6,812,500 |
| Water sale. | 12,484,533 |
| Savings regarding struvite precipitation. | 83,367 |
| Environmental benefits. |
>71,215,150 |
|
Ostara crystallization reactor | |
| General WWTP operation and maintenance cost. | 22,721,711 |
| Reactor operational and maintenance cost. | 574,000 |
| Investment cost | 10,558,090 |
| Water sale. | 12,484,533 |
| Struvite sale. | 6,812,500 |
| Sludge disposal savings | 273,020 |
| Savings regarding struvite precipitation. | 83,367 |
| Saving in comparison with chemical precipitation of struvite | 38,591,450 |
| Environmental benefits | 824,981,760,00 |