Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 21;11:e59. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.55

Table 5.

Percentage agreement with attitudes statements, comparison between camel milk consumers (n 214) and non-consumers (n 638)

n (%)
Attitude/belief Consumers (n 214) Non-consumers (n 638) P-value* (two-sided)
I am concerned with the fat content of camel milk 18 (8⋅4) 131 (20⋅5) <0⋅001
I am concerned with the cholesterol content of camel milk 18 (8⋅4) 138 (21⋅6) <0⋅001
I am concerned with sugar content of camel milk 21 (9⋅8) 90 (14⋅1) <0⋅001
I am concerned with sodium content of camel milk 19 (8⋅9) 92 (14⋅4) <0⋅001
I am concerned with pathogens content of unpasteurised camel milk 31 (14⋅5) 238 (37⋅3) <0⋅001
I am concerned with taste of camel milk 23 (10⋅7) 315 (49⋅4) <0⋅001
Camel milk spoils easily 33 (15⋅4) 108 (16⋅9) 0⋅010
Camel milk is expensive 68 (31⋅8) 227 (35⋅6) <0⋅001
Camel milk is not readily available 75 (35⋅0) 277 (43⋅4) <0⋅001
Unpasteurised camel milk is not recommended for pregnant women, children and elderly 54 (25⋅2) 250 (39⋅2) <0⋅001
Camel milk contains active components that reduce the risk of diseases 128 (59⋅8) 277 (43⋅4) <0⋅001
*

The P-values indicate the statistical significance of the χ2 test.