Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 21;5(7):e2223236. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23236

Table 3. Associations of Behavioral and Functional Health, Relationship Health, and Economic Difficulties at T2 by Problematic Anger at T1 Among Service Members Who Separated From the Military.

Outcome Model 1: Unadjusted, OR (95% CI) Model 2, aOR (95% CI)a Model 3, aOR (95% CI)b
Behavioral and functional health
Depression (n = 3444)c
No 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Yes 6.23 (5.12-7.58) 4.85 (3.95-5.96) 1.77 (1.37-2.30)
PTSD (n = 3444)d
No 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Yes 5.53 (4.65-6.58) 4.07 (3.39-4.88) 1.55 (1.23-1.96)
Problem drinking (n = 3446)e
No 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Yes 2.21 (1.76-2.76) 1.94 (1.53-2.47) 1.20 (0.88-1.63)
Days with functional limitations in last 12 mo (n = 3445)
0-1 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
2-5 1.18 (0.92-1.50) 1.17 (0.91-1.51) 1.13 (0.85-1.50)
6-15 1.54 (1.22-1.95) 1.39 (1.09-1.78) 1.13 (0.85-1.50)
16-60 2.52 (1.97-3.23) 2.10 (1.62-2.73) 1.38 (1.02-1.88)
>60 3.45 (2.66-4.47) 2.65 (2.01-3.48) 1.13 (0.80-1.60)
Relationship health
Relationship quality (n = 2871)f
Happy (5-7) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Unhappy/neutral (1-4) 2.06 (1.68-2.53) 1.99 (1.60-2.47) 1.46 (1.12-1.90)
Coping with parental demands (n = 1993)g
Very well 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Somewhat well 2.27 (1.74-2.96) 2.19 (1.65-2.89) 1.96 (1.42-2.68)
Fair 3.95 (2.95-5.29) 3.19 (2.35-4.34) 2.36 (1.66-3.36)
Poorly/very poorly 6.20 (4.20-9.16) 4.71 (3.12-7.10) 2.64 (1.61-4.35)
Social support (n = 3445)h
High (mean 5-7) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Moderate (mean 3-5) 2.68 (2.25-3.20) 2.36 (1.96-2.85) 1.69 (1.36-2.11)i
Low (mean 0-3) 2.66 (2.10-3.37) 2.36 (1.84-3.04) 1.66 (1.23-2.24)i
Economic difficulties
Major financial problems (n = 3436)
No 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Yes 2.83 (2.18-3.67) 2.14 (1.62-2.82) 1.47 (1.05-2.06) j
Financial security (n = 3435)k
Very comfortable/secure 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Able to make ends meet 2.00 (1.64-2.43) 1.50 (1.22-1.85) 1.30 (1.02-1.64)
Occasional difficulty 3.90 (3.08-4.95) 2.37 (1.83-3.07) 1.51 (1.11-2.05)
Substantial financial insecurity 4.69 (3.50-6.27) 2.92 (2.14-3.99) 1.64 (1.13-2.39)
Homeless, last 6 y (n = 3424)
No 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 5.06 (3.09-8.28) 3.42 (2.03-5.77) 1.93 (0.99-3.76)
Employment status (n = 3437)
Full-time 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Part-time 1.05 (0.75-1.46) 0.97 (0.68-1.39) 0.83 (0.55-1.25)
Not employed, looking 2.90 (2.03-4.16) 2.52 (1.72-3.70) 1.61 (1.01-2.58)
Not employed, not looking 1.23 (0.88-1.72) 1.01 (0.71-1.44) 0.86 (0.57-1.31)
Retired 1.59 (1.21-2.10) 1.70 (1.27-2.29) 1.35 (0.95-1.92)
Disabled 4.22 (3.15-5.65) 2.98 (2.19-4.07) 1.12 (0.75-1.68)

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; OR, odds ratio; PHQ, Patient Health Questionnaire; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder; T1, time 1 (September 26, 2014, to August 25, 2016); T2, time 2 (October 23, 2019, to August 31, 2021).

a

Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, military rank, service branch, and combat deployment history at T1.

b

Adjusted for variables in model 2, plus mental health (depression/PTSD), problem drinking, and physical health at T1.

c

Assessed using the PHQ-8.

d

Assessed using the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5).

e

Endorsement of 1 or more items on the PHQ alcohol items.

f

Restricted to participants who reported being in a committed relationship at the time of survey completion.

g

Restricted to participants who reported having children at the time of survey completion.

h

Assessed using 6 items from the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.

i

When the pandemic interaction term (problematic anger × T2 survey date) was included in model 3, it was statistically significant (P = .03); once stratified by T2 survey date, the association between problematic anger and major social support was only significant among those completing the survey prepandemic (low social support, adjusted odds ratio: 1.87; 95% CI, 1.33-2.63; moderate social support: aOR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.54-2.55).

j

When the pandemic interaction term (problematic anger × T2 survey date) was included in model 3, it was statistically significant (P = .03); once stratified by T2 survey date, the association between problematic anger and major financial problems was only significant among those completing the survey during the pandemic (aOR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.64-7.76).

k

Substantial financial insecurity consisted of “tough to make ends meet” or “in over our heads.”