Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 28;74(2):243–250. doi: 10.1002/acr.24449

Table 2.

The effect of inflammation detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on structural damage detected by MRI in the sacroiliac joints (multivariable models)*

≥5 fatty lesions/erosions, OR (95% CI) ≥3 fatty lesions, OR (95% CI) ≥3 erosions, OR (95% CI) Fatty lesions/erosions, β (95% CI) Fatty lesions, β (95% CI) Erosions β (95% CI)
Binary scores
BME at baseline (range 144–151) 5.6 (3.1, 10.0) 4.2 (2.4, 7.3) 4.1 (2.1, 7.8)
BME over 5 years (range 197–199)§ 7.7 (4.5, 13.4) 5.1 (2.7, 9.6) 3.2 (1.9, 5.3)
Continuous scores
SPARCC at baseline (range 144–151) 0.23 (0.15, 0.31) 0.12 (0.05, 0.19) 0.12 (0.06, 0.18)
SPARCC over 5 years (range 197–199)§ 0.13 (0.07, 0.19) 0.10 (0.04, 0.16) 0.04 (0.01, 0.06)
*

95% CI = 95% confidence interval; ASDAS = Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; BME = bone marrow edema (according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society definition [positive/negative]); OR = odds ratio; SPARCC = Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada.

Multilevel generalized estimating equation (GEE) models (i.e., effect of inflammation at baseline on the outcome at 5 years, taking the scores from the individual readers into account).

Adjusted for C‐reactive protein (CRP) level at baseline.

§

Longitudinal multilevel time‐lagged GEE models with autoregression (i.e., effect of inflammation at t on the outcome at t + 1, adjusted for the outcome at t, taking the scores from the individual readers into account).

Adjusted for time‐lagged ASDAS‐CRP score.