Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 29;44(4):998–1013. doi: 10.1002/hed.26992

TABLE 1.

COE versus biopsy or excision: Study characteristics

Author, year country study design Population History of oral cancer/lesions Sample size (no. of lesions) Mean age (years) No. of males (%) Index test Reference standard Dental professional performing index test Prevalence: dysplasia or malignant lesions Prevalence: malignant lesions

Allegra 2009 20

Italy

NR

Oral mucosa lesions NR 32 (45) 59 19/32 (59%) COE Punch biopsy Experienced otolaryngologist 30/45 (67%) 7/45 (16%)

Bhoopathi 2011 21

USA

Retrospective a

Atypical lesions or positive by brush biopsy NR 148 (148) 55 80/148 (54%) COE Scalpel biopsy Oral surgeons 12/148 (8%) NR

Brocklehurst 2015 18

UK

Retrospective

Standardized clinical photographs of mouth cancer, PMDs and benign lesions of the oral mucosa NR 90 (90) NR NR COE Histological confirmation Primary care dentists (N = 96) 35/90 (39%) NR
Hygienists/therapists (N = 63) 35/90 (39%) NR
Hospital based dentists (N = 9) 35/90 (39%) NR
Dental nurses (N = 24) 35/90 (39%) NR

Chainani‐Wu 2015 26

USA

Cross‐sectional, consecutive

Oral LP, ELP, or EP on clinical examination with no current history of oral cancer No 43 (77) 61 23/43 (54%) COE Punch or scalpel biopsy NR 17/77 (22%) b 6/77 (8%)

Epstein 2003 27

USA

Prospective

Treated within past 2 years for upper aerodigestive tract or pulmonary carcinoma but no current treatment for oral cancer Y (history of cancer) 81 (96) 61 61/81 (75%) COE Punch or wedge biopsy NR 30/96 (31%) c NR

Farah 2012 22

Australia

Prospective

Clinically suspicious oral mucosal white or mixed red/white lesion; no known oral epithelial dysplasia or SCC No 112 (118) 59 46/112 (41%) COE Scalpel biopsy Oral medicine specialists 28/118 (24%) NR

Forman 2015 30

USA

Retrospective

Oral lesion with biopsy and pathology report with unequivocal clinical impression and histologic diagnosis Y: 12.9% had a history of cancer 1003 (1003) 45 491/1003 (49%) COE Biopsy Surgeons (25–30 years experience) or residents (< 5 years experience) 74/1003 (7.4%) NR

Gillenwater 1998 19

USA

NR

Known or suspected premalignant or malignant oral cavity lesions and normal tissue from same patients NR 10 (28) NR NR COE Surgical biopsy Experienced neck and head surgeon or dental oncologist 17/28 (61%) NR

Hanken 2013 28

Germany

Prospective

Suspicious oral premalignant lesions but with no current advanced SCC NR 60 (60) NR (range 38–82) 20/60 (33%) COE Surgical biopsy Experienced oral and maxillofacial surgeon 54/60 (90%) 3% (2/60)

Jayaprakash 2013 (abst) 31

USA

NR

Potentially malignant white or white‐red oral mucosal lesions NR 146 (255) NR NR COE Biopsy NR 184/255 (72%) NR

Jayaprakash 2009 32

USA

NR

Clinically suspicious oral lesions or recently diagnosed untreated premalignant lesions or cancer, history of previously treated oral cancer but no evidence of cancer recurrence and no active malignancy treatment Y: 47% previous head and neck cancer 60 (249) 60 41/60 (68%) COE Biopsy Specialist dental oncologist 170/249 (68%) 15/249 (6%) d

Kammerer 2015 29

Germany

Prospective

Potentially malignant oral disorders NR 44 (50) 60 25/44 (57%) COE Scalpel/surgical biopsy NR 10/50 (20%) 7/50 (14%)

Koch 2011 23

Germany

NR

Clinically suspicious epithelial lesions or diagnosed oral mucosal lesion as SCC NR 78 (78) 62 46/78 (59%) COE Scalpel biopsy Specialist dental oncologist 33/78 (42%) 30/78 (38%)

Marzouki 2012 34

Canada

Prospective

Strong history of smoking, alcohol and suspicious lesion referred by GP, or previous history of cancer but cancer free and having regular follow‐ups Y: 68% previous head and neck cancer 33 (33) 62 49/85 (58%) COE Biopsy Head and neck oncology staff person 13/33 (40%) NR

McIntosh 2009 24 , e

Australia

NR

Clinically suspicious oral mucosal white lesion NR 50 (50) 57 23/50 (46%) COE Scalpel biopsy NR 9/50 (18%) NR

McNamara 2012 25

USA

NR

Undergoing initial oral evaluation and routine dental care NR NR (34) 45 67/130 (52%) COE Scalpel biopsy Resident, oral and maxillofacial pathology 3/34 (9%) NR

Patel 2011 33

New Zealand

Retrospective

All lesions involving soft tissues of mouth: tongue, gingiva, unattached mucosa, and the lips to the vermillion‐skin junction NR 3067 (3127) 49 1308/3067 (43%) COE Biopsy All clinicians combined 391/2517 (16%) 66/2517 (2.6%)
General dental practitioner 32/404 (8%) 3/404 (0.7%)
Specialist dentist with postgraduate qualifications 350/2079 (17%) 58/2079 (2.8%)

Piazza 2016 17

Italy

Prospective

Not treated for OC/OP with LPs and EPs and not been biopsied No 128 (128) 65 54/128 (42%) COE Excisional biopsy f NR 87/128 (68%) NR

Abbreviations: Abst, conference abstract; CIS, carcinoma in situ; COE, conventional oral examination; ELP, erythroleukoplakia; EPs, erythroplakias; LPs, leukoplakias; NR, not reported; OC, oral cavity; OP, oropharyngeal; PMDs, premalignant diseases; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

a

Consecutive cohort but retrospective analyses.

b

For severe dysplasia and cancer only.

c

For cancer or CIS only, not dysplasia.

d

Calculated for invasive SCC and other carcinomas (one salivary gland carcinoma and two verrucous carcinomas with SSC component).

e

Data reported for Microlux/DL examination but was same as clinical provisional diagnosis.

f

Excisional biopsy of the entire lesion under local or general anesthesia regardless of the appearance at COE.