Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 20;28(11):e202104161. doi: 10.1002/chem.202104161

Table 3.

TD‐DFT computations of g lum,calcd. for compound (R)‐6′, compared with the experimental value. All computations utilize the def2‐SV(P) basis set.

Method

| [10−20 esu cm]

|m| [10−20 erg G−1]

θ μ,m

g lum,calcd [10−4]

CAM‐B3LYP

1125

1.697

89.76

+0.248

CAM‐B3LYP‐D3(BJ)

1109

1.773

93.73

−4.16

ωB97XD

1096

1.862

92.95

−3.50

M06‐2X

1106

1.771

96.39

−7.13

experimental for (R)‐6

−8