Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 25;1512(1):114–125. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14756

Table 4.

Summary of results: subgroup analyses for maternal hemoglobin

Random effects model
Effect of MMS versus IFA on hemoglobin (third trimester), g/L n comparisons Mean difference (95% CI) P value (subgroup differences) Included studies
Subgroup analysis by iron dose
MMS 60 mg iron versus IFA 60 mg iron 3 −0.68 (−3.56, 2.20) 0.78 12, 19, 28
MMS 30 mg iron versus IFA 30 mg iron 4 0.14 (−0.71, 0.99) 20, 22, 27, 30
MMS 30 mg iron versus IFA 60 mg iron 4 −0.26 (−1.41, 0.89) 21, 23, 30, 40
Subgroup analysis by differences in total iron intake between IFA and MMS
Small difference IFA‐MMS (<1200 mg) 7 0.17 (−0.85, 1.20) 0.58 12, 19, 20, 22, 27, 28, 30
Large difference IFA‐MMS (≥1200 mg) 4 −0.26 (−1.41, 0.89) 21, 23, 30, 40

Christian; 19 Liu; 27 Moore; 28 Osrin; 40 Ramakrishnan; 12 SUMMIT; 20 Sunawang; 21 Tofail; 30 West; 22 and Zeng. 23