Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 25;1512(1):114–125. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14756

Table 5.

Summary of results: subgroup analyses for maternal iron deficiency anemia

 Random effects model  Random effects model
Effect of MMS versus IFA on iron deficiency anemia (third trimester), Hb<110 g/L and serum ferritin<12 μg/dL for most studies n comparisons Risk ratio (95% CI) P value (subgroup differences) n comparisons Risk difference (95% CI) P value (subgroup differences) Included studies
Subgroup analysis by iron dose
MMS 60 mg iron versus IFA 60 mg iron 3 1.18 (0.94−1.48) 0.76 3 0.17 (−0.06 to 0.39) 0.76 12, 19, 28
MMS 30 mg iron versus IFA 30 mg iron 2 0.91 (0.43−1.93) 2 −0.10 (−0.85 to 0.66) 27, 30
MMS 30 mg iron versus IFA 60 mg iron 2 1.31 (0.66−2.60) 2 0.27 (−0.41 to 0.96) 21, 30
Subgroup analysis by differences in total iron intake between IFA and MMS
Small difference IFA‐MMS (<1200 mg) 5 1.15 (0.93−1.41) 0.71 5 0.14 (−0.07 to 0.35) 0.71 12, 19, 27, 28, 30
Large difference IFA‐MMS (≥1200 mg) 2 1.31 (0.66−2.60) 2 0.27 (−0.41 to 0.96) 21, 30

Christian; 19 Liu; 27 Moore; 28 Ramakrishnan; 12 Sunawang; 21 and Tofail. 30