Abstract
Psychobiotics are a group of probiotics that affect the central nervous system (CNS) related functions and behaviors mediated by the gut-brain-axis (GBA) via immune, humoral, neural, and metabolic pathways to improve not only the gastrointestinal (GI) function but also the antidepressant and anxiolytic capacity. As a novel class of probiotics, the application of psychobiotics has led researchers to focus on a new area in neuroscience. In the past five years, some psychobiotics strains were reported to inhibit inflammation and decreased cortisol levels, resulting in an amelioration of the symptoms of anxiety and depression. Psychobiotics are efficacious in improving neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Use of psychobiotics can improve GI function, ASD symptoms, motor functions of patients with PD and cognition in patients with AD. However, the evidence for the effects of psychobiotics on mental and neurological conditions/ disorders remains limited. Further studies of psychobiotics are needed in order to determine into their effectiveness and mechanism as treatments for various psychiatric disorders in the future.
Keywords: Psychobiotics, Probiotics, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Psychiatric disorders
1. Introduction
The human gut contains 1014 microorganisms, a value that is 100 times greater than the number of cells in the human body [1,2]. Gut microbiota have been reported to be involved in various physiological processes, including immunomodulation, energy balance and activation of the enteric nervous system (ENS) [3–7]. The individual’s profile of microbiota is controlled by factors including diet, genetics, sex, and age [5,8]. The microbiota plays critical roles in human health. In particular, dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is correlated to various diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). For instance, lower Bifidobacterium and/or Lactobacillus counts were observed in subjects with major depressive disorder [9–11]. In addition, a decreased number of Bifidobacterium was observed in the gut microbiota of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [12]. According to a recent study, the relative abundances of anti-inflammatory bacteria, including the genera Blautia, Roseburia and Coprococcus, were significantly lower in fecal samples from patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) [13]. Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been found with lower relative abundances of microbiota and lower overall bacterial diversity [14]. Furthermore, dysregulation of gut microbiota increases the risk of developing the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [15,16].
The evidence of microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGBA) communication can be found from the relationship between gut dysbiosis with functional gastrointestinal disorders and central nervous disorders [17]. Communication between the gut and brain has been identified, and the emotional state is impacted by the function of the GI tract [18,19]. Dysregulation of the MGBA has been reported to correlate with neuropsychological, GI, and metabolic disorders [19]. According to a review article of Burokas et al., the brain and the gut microbiota may bidirectionally communicate via neurotransmitters, immunomodulation, the ENS and short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [20]. Decreased social interactions of germ-free (GF) animals compared with specific pathogen-free (SPF) controls demonstrated the concept of MGBA [21]. Transplantation of a standard microbiota into GF mice improves social deficits further evidenced the importance of gut microbiota to CNS function [22].
2. Psychobiotics
In 2013, Dinan and colleagues defined the term “psychobiotics “ as a novel class of probiotics that suggest potential applications in treating psychiatric diseases [23]. The majority of psychobiotic research is performed using animal studies which induce stress and conduct behavioral tests to rodents to evaluate motivation, anxiety, and depression [3]. Psychobiotics may regulate the neurotransmitters and proteins, including gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), serotonin, glutamate and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which play important roles in controlling the neural excitatory-inhibitory balance, mood, cognitive functions, learning and memory processes [24–26]. Sudo and colleagues described a crucial role of the microbiota and hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal axis (HPA). Slight restraint stress of GF mice induces excess release of corticosterone and adrenocorticotropic hormone compared with the SPF mice [27]. In addition, the exaggerated proinflammatory cytokines activate the HPA axis, enhance the permeability of blood-brain barrier (BBB), and decrease the level of serotonin, which lead to psychiatric conditions such as depression [28,29]. Some strains of Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., such as Lactobacillus brevis, Bifidobacterium dentium and Lactobacillus plantarum produce GABA and serotonin [30–32]. In addition, strains of Lactobacillus, such as L. plantarum and Lactobacillus odontolyticus produce acetylcholine [33]. Recently, it has been found that serotonin synthesis in the gut can be regulated by microbes. For instance, spore-forming bacteria from the gut microbiota have been found to induce serotonin biosynthesis from gut enterochromaffin cells [34]. Those probiotics are worthy of study to elucidate their psychobiotic potential, particularly in psychiatric disorders. In this review, we summarized the potential applications of psychobiotics to psychiatric disorders and suggested possible directions for future research.
3. Psychobiotics in mental health
Good mental health represents a status of mental, psychological well-being. Proposed by Dinan and colleagues, the application of psychobiotics may require a precision strategy for targeting anxiety and depression behaviors [23]. A growing body of evidence showed that psychobiotics have the psychotropic effects on depression, anxiety and stress (Table 1). Several probiotics strains were reported as psychobiotics from animal studies. The administration of Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 (PS128) reduced anxiety and depression-like behaviors of mice. PS128 significantly decreased inflammation and corticosterone levels. Notably, administration of PS128 significantly increased levels of dopamine and serotonin in the prefrontal cortex and striatum compared with control mice [35,36]. The administration of the single strain Lactobacillus helveticus NS8 reduced anxiety, depression and cognitive dysfunction. In addition, L. helveticus NS8 increased the serotonin, norepinephrine (NE) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in the hippocampus [37]. Using single strain of B. longum 1714 decreased the stress, depression and anxiety behaviors [38]. The Lactobacillus rhamnosus (JB-1) could decrease anxiety and depression. In particular, the intake of JB-1 leads to region-dependent alterations in GABA receptor expression in the brain and reduces the plasma corticosterone (CORT) level [39]. The administration of the single strain Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 is effective on treating anxiety. In addition, the expression of BDNF in the hippocampus is upregulated after the administration of the single strain B. longum NCC3001 [40]. Using a signal strain of Bacterium infantis 35624 is effective on depression-like behaviors [41].
Table 1.
Psychobiotics reported for mental health.
| Study model | Psychobiotics, dosage and route of administration | Duration of probiotics administration | Test | Observation summary | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELS mice N = 10/group |
L. plantarum PS128 109 CFU/mouse/day by gavage |
16 days |
|
Locomotor activity ↑ Anxiety-like behaviors in naïve mice ↓ Depression-like behaviors in ELS mice ↓ Corticosterone levels in ELS mice ↓ TNF-α and IL-6 ↓ IL-10 ↑ Dopamine and serotonin levels in the prefrontal cortex ↑ |
[35] |
| Germ-free mice N = 10/group |
Heat-killed or live L. plantarum PS128 109 CFU/mouse/day by gavage |
16 days |
|
Live: Locomotor activity ↑ Anxiety-like behavior ↓ Dopamine and serotonin levels in the striatum ↑ Heat-killed: NA |
[36] |
| Male SPF CRS rats N = 8/group |
L. helveticus NS8 109 CFU/ml in drinking water |
21 days |
|
Anxiety and depression ↓ Cognitive dysfunction ↓ Plasma CORT and ACTH levels ↓ Plasma IL-10 levels ↑ Serotonin and NE levels and BDNF expression in the hippocampus ↑ |
[37] |
| Male BALB/c mice N = 22/group |
B. longum 1714 or B. breve 1205 109 CFU/day by gavage |
21–41 days |
|
B. longum 1714: Stress ↓ Depression ↓ Anxiety ↓ B. breve 1205: Anxiety ↓ |
[38] |
| Male BALB/c mice N = 16/group |
L. rhamnosus (JB-1) 109 CFU/mouse/day by gavage |
28 days |
|
Depression ↓ Anxiety ↓ Plasma CORT levels ↓ GABA receptor (GABAb1b) expression in cortical regions ↑ and in the hippocampus, amygdala and locus coeruleus ↓ (GABAAα2) expression in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala ↓ Hippocampus ↑ The effect of probiotics was abolished by vagotomy |
[39] |
| Male T-muris-infected AKR mice L. rhamnosus: N = 10 B. longum: N = 16 Placebo: N = 16 |
L. rhamnosus NCC4007 or B. longum NCC3001 |
10 days |
|
Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001: Anxiety-like behavior ↓ BDNF expression in the hippocampus ↑ Circulating cytokine levels: NA |
[40] |
| MS rats Control: N = 7 Probiotics: N = 8 |
B. infantis 35624 1 × 1010 CFU/100 ml in drinking water |
45 days |
|
Depression ↓ CORT: NA Tryptophan and tryptophan metabolites: NA |
[41] |
| Healthy male volunteers (Mean age: 25.5) N = 22 |
B. longum 1714 1 × 109 CFU/day |
4 weeks |
|
Stress ↓ Hippocampus-dependent visuospatial memory performance ↑ Frontal midline electroencephalographic mobility ↑ |
[42] |
| Petrochemical workers (Age: 20–60 years) N = 70 Probiotic yogurt + placebo capsule: Men = 12 Women = 13 Conventional yogurt + probiotic capsule: Men = 12 Women = 13 Conventional yogurt + placebo capsule: Men = 12 Women = 8 |
Probiotic yogurt: L. acidophilus LA5 and B. lactis BB12 1 × 107 CFU/day Conventional yogurt: S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus Probiotic capsule: 1. L. casei 3 × 103, 2. L. acidophilus 3 × 107, 3. L. rhamnosus 7 × 109, 4. L. bulgaricus 5 × 108, 5. B. breve 2 × 1010, 6. B. longum 1 × 109, 7. S. thermophiles 3 × 108 CFU/day/capsule |
6 weeks |
|
In both the probiotic yogurt + placebo capsule and conventional yogurt + probiotic capsule groups: DASS ↓ GHQ ↓ ACTH: NA |
[43] |
| Male Wistar rats N = 12/group Healthy subjects (Age: 30–60 years) N = 55 Probiotics: Men = 7 Women = 19 Placebo: Men = 7 Women = 22 |
L. helveticus R0052 and B. longum R0175 Rats: 109 CFU/rat/day by gavage Humans: 3 × 109 CFU/stick/day |
Rats: 14 days Humans: 30 days |
Rats:
|
Rats: Anxiety-like behavior ↓ Humans: Somatization ↓ Anxiety and depression ↓ Anger-hostility ↓ Problem solving ↑ Median urinary free cortisol level ↓ |
[44] |
| Healthy subjects (UFC levels are less than baseline values) N = 25 |
L. helveticus R0052 and B. longum R0175 3 × 109 CFU/stick/day |
30 days |
|
Anxiety and depression ↓ | [45] |
ELS: Early life stress; SPT: Sucrose preference test; OFT: Open field test; EPM: Elevated plus maze; FST: Forced swimming test; NA: not applicable; PAL: Paired Associate Learning; EEG: Electroencephalography; SECPT: Socially evaluated cold presser test; GHQ: General health questionnaire; DASS: Depression anxiety and stress scale; ATCH: Adrenocorticotropic hormone; SPF: specificpathogen-free; CRS: chronic restraint stress; ORT: Object recognition test; OPT: Object placement test; CORT: corticosterone; NE: norepinephrine; BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; SIH: Stress-induced hyperthermia; DMB: Defensive marble burying; TST: Tail suspension test; HCL-90: Hopkins Symptom Checklist; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; PSS: Perceived Stress Scale; CCL: Coping Checklist; UFC: urinary free cortisol; MS: Maternal separation.
In addition to promising animal studies, several research has found positive effects of probiotics on mental health in humans. Healthy volunteers who were administered Bifidobacterium longum 1714 for 4 weeks exhibit reduced stress and improved memory [42]. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the effects of probiotic yogurt (Lactobacillus acidophilus LA5 and Bifidobacterium lactis BB12) and probiotic capsules (Lactobacillus casei, L. acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum and Streptococcus thermophiles) on petrochemical workers [43]. Recipients using both probiotic yogurt and probiotic capsules exhibited improved mental health parameters by assessing the depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS) general health questionnaire (GHQ). A probiotic combination of L. helveticus R0052 plus B. longum R0175 reduces anxiety and depression in healthy subjects compared with the control [44]. In addition, the urinary free cortisol level is significantly decreased by the L. helveticus R0052 plus B. longum R0175 intervention [45].
Some ongoing clinical studies are investigating the effects of probiotic supplements (L. plantarum PS128, L. plantarum 299v, L. rhamnosus GG, Bifihappy, Vivomixx®, Probio’Stick, etc.) on depression and anxiety [46–52]. These studies will evaluate the state of inflammation, stress and mood of recipients.
Possible communication pathways between brain and gut microbiota were immunoregulatory, neuroendocrine, and vagus pathways [53]. Probiotics intervention such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Enterococcus can decrease the levels of inflammatory cytokines [54]. The anti-immunoregulatory effects of probiotics have been reported to activate the population of T regulatory cell as well as the secretion of IL-10 [23]. In addition, probiotics contact with gut epithelium enteroendocrine cells (EECs) to produce neuropeptides and neurotransmitter such as peptide YY (PYY), neuropeptide Y (NPY), substance P, serotonin, glucagon-like peptide-1 and -2 (GLP-1 and GLP-2), and cholecystokinin [55,56]. Approximately 95% of serotonin is derived from gut enterochromaffin cells and ENS neurons, which is associated with the regulation of GI secretion and motility [57]. In addition, the brain serotonin pathways are involved in regulating cognition and mood [58]. Therefore, dysfunctional serotonin pathways may contribute to the comorbidity of GI and mood disorders. Although the aforementioned studies have shown some promising evidence regarding the potential prospects of psychobiotics, the data from humans remains limited. Further clinical studies are needed in this area.
4. Psychobiotics in neurodegenerative disorders
4.1. Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
AD is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive and memory impairments [59]. The evidence on the effects of probiotics on ameliorating cognitive disorders are limited. In Table 2, we summarize the effects of psychobiotics on AD. In a recent work Agahi et al. investigated the effect of probiotic administration on patients with severe AD [60]. The results found that severe AD patients were insensitive to probiotic supplementation. One explorative intervention study using multiple strains, L. casei W56, Lactococcus lactis W19, L. acidophilus W22, B. lactis W52, L. paracasei W20, L. plantarum W62, B. lactis W51, B. bifidum W23 and L. salivarius W24 on subjects with AD [61]. The gut bacteria composition and tryptophan metabolism in serum were influenced by probiotics intervention. Recently, Bonfili and colleagues found that administration of probiotic formulation (SLAB51) on transgenic AD mice significantly reduced the oxidative stress by inducing SIRT-1-dependent mechanisms [62]. Two studies investigated the effect of multiple strains, L. acidophilus, Lactobacillus fermentum, B. lactis and B. longum, on an animal model of AD. The total counts of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. were increased and Coliform was decreased in the stool after the probiotic intervention. Furthermore, probiotic supplementation improves learning and memory deficits in AD rats compared with control rats. Reductions in the number of amyloid plaques, inflammation and oxidative stress were observed in the Alzheimer-probiotics group [63]. The administration of probiotics decreases the insulin level and insulin resistance compared to the control. However, no significant difference in serum triglyceride (TG) levels is observed between control- and probiotic-treated AD rats [64]. In addition, a treatment with cow’s milk fermented with L. fermentum (LAB9, LAB10) (CM-LAB9) or with L. casei (LABPC) increases learning, memory behavior and antioxidant levels (SOD, GSH, and GPx). The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, malondialdehyde (MDA) and AChE are reduced in the probiotic group compared to the control group [65]. A single strain of L. plantarum MTCC1325 not only improves cognitive behaviors and gross behavioral activities but also restores the level of acetylcholine (ACh) in d-galactose-induced AD rats [66]. One randomized, double-blind, and controlled clinical trial found that consumption of probiotic-treated milk (L. acidophilus, L. casei, B. bifidum and L. fermentum) decreased the plasma MDA and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. The insulin resistance, beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity were changed by the probiotic intervention in recipients with AD. Notably, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was significantly improved after administration of the probiotic treatment [67].
Table 2.
Psychobiotics reported for Alzheimer’s disease.
| Study model | Psychobiotics, dosage and route of administration | Duration of probiotics administration | Test | Observation summary | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects with severe AD (Age: 65–90 years) Control group Male = 10 Female = 13 Probiotic group Male = 17 Female = 18 |
Capsule one: L. fermentum, L. plantarum and B. lactis Capsule two: L. acidophilus, B. bifidum, and B. longum Total dosage of 3 × 109 CFU/day |
12 weeks |
|
Serum NO, GSH, TAC, MDA and 8-OHdG: NA Cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10): NA |
[60] |
| Subjects with AD (Mean age: 76.7 years) Male = 11 Female = 9 |
Probiotic supplements: L. casei W56, Lactococcus lactis W19, L. acidophilus W22, B. lactis W52, L. paracasei W20, L. plantarum W62, B. lactis W51, B. bifidum W23 and L. salivarius W24. |
4 weeks |
|
Fecal zonulin ↓ Faecalibacterium and prausnitzii ↑ Serum kynurenine ↑ Serum tryptophan, phenylalanine and tyrosine: NA |
[61] |
| Male transgenic AD mice (3xTg-AD) N = 64 |
SLAB51: S. thermophilus, B. longum, B. breve, B. infantis, L. acidophilus, L. plantarum, L. paracasei, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, L. brevis 200bn bacteria/Kg/day in drinking water |
16 weeks |
|
Brain tissue: SIRT1 activity and expression ↑ Level of acetylated p53 and total p53 ↓ Level of acetylated RARβ and total RARβ ↓ Activity of antioxidant enzymes (GST, GPx, SOD and CAT) ↓ Protein and lipid oxidation ↓ The level of Cleaved PARP, OGG1, 8-OHdG ↓ |
[62] |
| Male Wistar rats receiving intrahippocampal injections of Amyloid beta (Aβ1–42) N = 12 per group |
L. acidophilus (1688FL431-16LA02), L. fermentum (ME3), B. lactis (1195SL609-16BS01) and B. longum (1152SL593-16BL03) 1010 CFU/day in drinking water |
8 weeks |
|
Stool samples: Total Coliform count ↓ Total Bifidobacterium count ↑ Total Lactobacillus count ↑ Learning and memory ↑ Amyloid plaques ↓ Inflammation and oxidative stress ↓ MDA and SOD levels ↓ Catalase levels: NA |
[63] |
| Male Wistar rats receiving intrahippocampal injections of Amyloid beta (Aβ1–42) N = 12 per group |
L. acidophilus, L. fermentum, B. lactis and B. longum 1010 CFU/day in drinking water |
8 weeks |
|
Insulin level ↓ Insulin resistance ↓ Serum TG level: NA |
[64] |
| Male ICR mice N = 5 per group |
Fermented cow’s milk containing L. fermentum (LAB9, LAB10) (CM-LAB9) or L. casei (LABPC) 109 CFU/0.2 ml by oral gavage |
28 days |
|
Learning and memory behaviors ↑ Antioxidant levels (SOD, GSH, and GPx) ↑ MDA, AChE and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels ↓ |
[65] |
| Wistar rats with d-galactose-induced AD N = 6 per group |
L. plantarum MTCC1325 12 × 108 CFU/ml; 10 ml/kg body weight |
60 days |
|
Cognitive Behavior ↑ Gross Behavioral Activity ↑ The cortex and hippocampus: ACh ↑ AChE ↓ |
[66] |
| Subjects with AD (Age: 60–95 years) N = 30 per group Male = 6 Female = 24 |
Probiotic milk: 1. L. acidophilus 2. L. casei 3. B. bifidum 4. L. fermentum 2 × 109 CFU/day |
12 weeks |
|
Improvement in cognition (MMSE) Plasma MDA level ↓ hs-CRP level ↓ Changes in insulin resistance, β-cell function and insulin sensitivity |
[67] |
TYM: Test Your Memory; MWM: Morris water maze; MDA: Malondialdehyde; NO: nitric oxide; GSH: glutathione; TAC: total antioxidant capacity; 8-OHdG: 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine; CDT: Clock drawing test; MMSE: Mini-mental state examination; SIRT1: Sirtuin-1; GPx: Glutathione peroxidase; GST: Glutathione S-transferase; CAT: Catalase; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; NA: not applicable; RARβ: Retinoic acid receptor-β; PARP: poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1; OGG1: 8-Oxoguanine glycosylase; HOMA-IR: Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; TG: triglycerides; Ach: Acetylcholine; AChE: Acetylcholinesterase; HOMA-B: Homeostatic model assessment for β-cell function; QUICKI: Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; hs-CRP: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein in serum.
Based on the findings from animal studies, probiotics use ameliorates cognitive and memory deficits compared with the control [63,65,66]. The systemic inflammation was reduced after probiotics intervention. One possible mechanism may be mediated through SIRT1 pathway [62]. In addition, a probiotic supplement has been shown to improve the cognition of recipients with AD [67]. These studies show some evidence of probiotics treatment on AD. However, one study showed inconsistent effects of probiotic supplement on severe AD patients [60]. Further studies are need that into consideration of factors such as severity of AD and age in order to gain a better understanding of the efficacy of probiotics to treat AD.
4.2. Parkinson’s disease (PD)
PD is a neuropsychiatric disorder that influences approximately two percent of the elderly population [68]. Constipation is a common nonmotor symptom of patients with PD [69–71]. In Table 3, we summarize the effects of psychobiotics on PD. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, subjects with PD were administered a probiotic supplement containing L. acidophilus, B. bifidum, Lactobacillus reuteri, and L. fermentum for 12 weeks. The probiotic consumption group exhibited a decreased score on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) compared to the placebo group. In addition, the consumption of probiotics not only significantly reduced the hs-CRP and MDA levels but also increased the glutathione (GSH) levels. Notably, probiotic consumption significantly improved the insulin function compared with the placebo [72]. One randomized controlled study focused on inflammation, insulin and lipid-related genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from subjects with PD. After a 12-week intervention, subjects with PD who received the probiotic supplement displayed a significant downregulated expression of interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and upregulated expression of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) compared with the placebo control. However, no effect was found on probiotic intake to the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) or the markers of inflammation and oxidative stress [73]. Three studies found that recipients with PD who were using probiotics exhibited improved gastrointestinal functions. Subjects with PD who ingested fermented milk containing multiple strains of probiotics exhibited an amelioration of constipation [74]. Treatment with a probiotic combination of L. acidophilus and B. infantis significantly reduced abdominal pain and bloating [75]. Additionally, patients with PD exhibited improved stool consistency and bowel habits after 5 weeks of treatment with fermented milk containing L. casei Shirota [76].
Table 3.
Psychobiotics reported for Parkinson’s disease.
| Study model | Psychobiotics, dosage and route of administration | Duration of probiotics administration | Test | Observation summary | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects with PD (Age: 50–90 years) N = 60 Probiotics: N = 30 Placebo: N = 30 |
L. acidophilus, B. bifidum, L. reuteri, and L. fermentum each 2 × 109 CFU Total 8 × 109 CFU/day |
12 weeks |
|
MDS-UPDRS ↓ hs-CRP levels ↓ MDA levels ↓ GSH levels ↑ Insulin levels ↓ Insulin resistance ↓ Insulin sensitivity ↑ Triglyceride, VLDL and HDL levels: NA |
[72] |
| Subjects with PD Probiotics: N = 25 Placebo: N = 25 |
Probiotic supplements: 8 × 109 CFU/day |
12 weeks |
|
IL-1, IL-8 and TNF-α levels ↓ TGF-β and PPAR-γ levels ↑ LDLR and VEGF levels: NA |
[73] |
| Subjects with PD and Rome III–confirmed constipation N = 120 |
Fermented milk: Prebiotic fiber and multiple probiotic strains: 1. S. salivarius subsp thermophilus 2. Enterococcus faecium 3. L. rhamnosus GG 4. L. acidophilus 5. L. plantarum 6. L. paracasei 7. L. delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus 8. B. breve 9. B. animalis subsp lactis 250 × 109 CFU/day |
4 weeks |
|
CBMs ↑ Constipation ↓ |
[74] |
| Subjects with PD (Mean age: 76.05 years) Male = 17 Female = 23 |
L. acidophilus and B. infantis tablet/ twice/day | 3 months |
|
Abdominal pain ↓ Bloating ↓ |
[75] |
| Subjects with PD N = 40 |
Milk fermented with L. casei Shirota 6.5 × 109 CFU/day |
5 weeks |
|
Improvement of stool consistency and bowel habits Abdominal pain and bloating ↓ Sensation of incomplete emptying ↓ |
[76] |
MDS-UPDRS: Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; hs-CRP: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR: Homeostasis model of assessment-estimated insulin resistance; QUICKI: Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; MDA: Malondialdehyde; GSH: Glutathione; NA: not applicable; PBMC: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells; IL-1: Interleukin-1; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; TGF-β: Transforming growth factor beta; PPAR-γ: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; LDLR: Low-density lipoprotein receptor; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; CBMs: Complete bowel movements; NMS-Quest: Non-motor symptoms questionnaire.
An ongoing open-label pilot study is investigating the effect of PS128 on patients with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage: 1–2.5). The primary outcome will be measured with the UPDRS (Part III) motor score after the administration of 60 billion colony-forming units (CFU) of the PS128 intervention for 12 weeks. In addition, the secondary outcome will be measured with the Nonmotor Symptoms (NMS-Quest) score and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score [77]. Another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is recruiting patients with PD to evaluate improvements in constipation induced by probiotic capsule containing B. lactis. The primary outcome will be assessed on amelioration of the frequency of stool movements every week after the administration of the probiotic intervention for 4 weeks. The secondary outcome will be assessed on improvements in the constipation severity score (ROME IV criteria), patient’s quality of life (PAC-QOL questionnaire) and stool consistency (Bristol stool chart) [78].
The majority of clinical studies of probiotics in patients with PD have been focused on gastrointestinal function [74–76,78]. Only one study reported that probiotics improved the movement of patients with PD [72]. It has been found that oxidative stress and inflammations were increased in the severity of PD [79]. The aforementioned studies have showed promising effects of psychobiotics by reducing oxidative stress and the inflammations in patients with PD. One of the critical pathological features of PD are Lewy bodies formation of dopaminergic neurons which cause by accumulation of misfolded α-synuclein protein [80]. Recently, Chandra and colleagues reported that α-synuclein was expressed in the enteroendocrine cells [81,82]. It is possible that misfolded α-synuclein first produces in enteroendocrine cells and propagates to the nervous system. Evaluation of the effect of probiotic supplements on abnormal α-synuclein in enteroendocrine cells are suggested in future investigations on PD.
5. Psychobiotics in neurodevelopmental disorders
5.1. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
ASD, a neurodevelopmental disorder, is characterized by deficits in social communication and social interactions across multiple contexts, accompanied by restricted and repetitive patterns of behaviors, interests, and/or activities [83].
The global prevalence of ASD has been estimated to be one in 160 children. Patients with ASD frequently experience gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, diarrhea and constipation [84]. It has been shown that probiotics could improve the GI symptoms and even the ASD-related symptoms in patients with ASD. By searching the top 5 primary registries accepted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) in the WHO network, 10 clinical trials using probiotics interventions have been registered to date (Table 4).
Table 4.
Clinical trials investigating probiotic interventions in patients with ASDa.
| Intervention and duration | Registry and status | Primary outcomes | Secondary outcomes | Subjects number and age | Study location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02903030) [85] Completed |
Gastrointestinal (GI) Module of the PedsQL |
|
3–12 years Probiotics group: 6 Placebo group: 6 |
United States |
|
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02708901) [86] Recruiting |
ADOS-2 |
|
18–72 months Expected numbers of subjects: 1. Subjects with GI symptoms GI-Probiotics group: 25 GI-Placebo group: 25 2. Subjects without GI symptoms NGI-Probiotics group: 25 NGI-Placebo group: 25 |
Italy |
|
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03369431) [87] Recruiting |
ATEC |
|
3–16 years Expected numbers of subjects: Probiotics group: 41 Placebo group: 41 |
United Kingdom |
|
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02674984) [89] Recruiting |
Adverse events assessed using a case report form |
|
4–15 years Expected numbers of subjects: Probiotics group: 20 Placebo group: 10 |
United States |
|
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03514784) [90] Not yet recruiting |
Adverse events (safety survey from a case report form) |
|
4–15 years Expected numbers of subjects: High dose group: 28 Low dose group: 28 Placebo: 14 |
United States |
| Probiotics (L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus and B. longum), 108 CFU/gram Duration: 5 g/day for 3 months |
Japan registries network (JPRN) (UMIN000026157) Completed Result published [88] |
1. 6-GSI 2. ATEC |
– | 5–9 years Open-label, 30 subjects (19 boys and 11 girls) |
Egypt |
|
Japan registries network (JPRN) (UMIN000033113) [91] Not yet recruiting |
1. VABS 2. ABC |
|
6–18 years Expected number of subjects: 100 |
Japan |
|
ISRCTN (ISRCTN04516575) [92] Completed |
1. Gut microbiota 2. Diversity and dynamics of lactic acid bacteria and clostridia |
|
4–16 years The protocol did not provide the number of subjects. |
United Kingdom |
|
Australia and New Zealand (ACTRN12616001002471) [94] Completed |
1. ABCT 2. SRS 3. CBCL |
|
7–15 years Subjects are boys with ASD. Probiotics group: 40 Placebo group: 40 |
Taiwan |
Intervention:
|
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03337035) [95] Not yet recruiting |
1. Social communication and behavior (ADOS, ADI-R, SRS, ATEC) 2. Social behavior (ABC) |
|
5–15 years Expected numbers of subjects: Probiotics group: 30 Placebo group: 30 |
United States |
Study status updated on October 30, 2018.
ABC: Aberrant Behavior Checklist; ABC-T: Autism Behavior Checklist-Taiwan Version; ADI-R: Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised; ADOS: Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule; APSI: Autism Parenting Stress Index; ATEC: Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist; CBCL: Child Behavior Checklist; CARS: Childhood Autism Rating Scale; CHI-I: Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement; CSHQ: Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire; GIH: Gastrointestinal History; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; PedsQL: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory; QPGS-RIII: Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms (QPGS) based on Rome III Criteria; SCQ: Social Communication Questionnaire; SRS: Social Responsiveness Scale.
The effects of some multiple strain probiotic products on patients with ASD have been investigated. Visbiome extra strength is a probiotic product which contains 8 strains of probiotics, including L. acidophilus DSM24735™, L. plantarum DSM24730™, Lactobacillus paracasei DSM24733™, L. helveticus DSM24734™, Streptococcus thermophilus DSM24731™, B. lactis DSM24736™, B. breve DSM24732™, and B. lactis DSM24737™. In 2016–2017, the effects of Visbiome on GI symptoms in children with ASD were investigated [85]. Another product containing multiple probiotic strains, Vivomixx, is being used in 2 ongoing trials in patients with ASD. The primary outcome of the trial conducted in Italy is the change in the severity of ASD measured using ADOS-2 [86]. Subjects will be divided into 2 groups: those with GI symptoms and those without GI symptoms. Subjects will take 2 packets/day of the intervention for 1 month and 1 packet for additional 5 months. The other trial conducted in UK is a crossover trial [87]. Subjects will be assigned to either a probiotic or placebo group for 4 weeks, followed by 4 weeks of washout. After washout, the subjects will crossover to the other group for 4 weeks. This study uses ATEC to measure the changes in ASD symptoms. Vivomixx contains 450 billion lyophilized bacterial cells belonged to 8 probiotic strains, S. thermophiles DSM 24731, B. breve DSM 24732, B. longum DSM 24736, B. infantis DSM 24737, L. acidophilus DSM 24735, L. plantarum DSM 24730, L. paracasei DSM 24733, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus DSM 24734, per sachet. Vivomixx and Visbiome contain the same 8 strains of probiotics, according to the deposition number of the probiotics. An open-label trial conducted in Egypt used 3 probiotics strains, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, and B. longum, and assessed their effects on GI and ASD symptoms [88]. According to recently published results of the study, the severity of autism and GI symptoms, as assessed using ATEC and 6-GSI, respectively, were improved after the 3-month intervention with probiotics [88]. The effects of a probiotic product containing B. lactis BB-12 (BB-12) and L. rhamnosus GG (LGG) (BB-12 + LGG) on ASD was also investigated. A placebo-controlled trial conducted in the US investigating the adverse events of BB-12 + LGG as the primary outcome in children with ASD is in progress [89]. Adverse events will be assessed using a case report form. Another placebo-controlled trial aimed to survey the safety of 2 doses of the probiotic formulation (1010 and 1011 CFU). This study comprised a 56-day intervention with probiotics or placebo and a subsequent 28-day observational stage without the intervention. This study is yet to recruit patients [90]. A probiotic product (Gastrus) containing 2 L. reuteri strains (DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 6475) will be investigated for its effects on ASD symptoms in Japan (UMIN000033113 [91]). The primary outcomes of this study are VABS and ABC for the ASD clinical psychiatric evaluation.
The use of single probiotic strain in an ASD study was also recorded. L. plantarum WCFS1 was used in a placebo-controlled trial conducted in the UK in 2012 [92]. This study recruited patients with ASD presenting with GI problems for a 6-week intervention with either probiotics or placebo. The dose of the probiotics is not provided and the study results are not available. However, Parracho et al. reported the results of L. plantarum WCFS1 in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study that investigated effects of L. plantarum WCFS1 on children with ASD in 2010 [93]. This study was conducted in the United Kingdom without registration and the primary outcome of this study was not presented. According to the report, 17 subjects completed the trial and L. plantarum WCFS1 improved behavior- and communication-related problems, as assessed using the Development Behaviour Checklist (DBC). It was shown that the administration of the L. plantarum WCFS1 intervention for 3 weeks altered the gut microbiota. In 2016, L. plantarum PS128 (PS128) was used in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Taiwan investigating the effects of PS128 on boys with ASD (ACTRN12616001002471 [94]). Eighty subjects were included and randomly assigned to either the PS128 (3 × 1010 CFU/ capsule, 2 capsules/day) group or the placebo (microcrystalline as placebo capsule, 2 capsules/day) group for the 28-day intervention. A source of bias in this study is that only boys with ASD were included. Results of the study are not yet available. The effects of a single probiotic strain in combination with an oxytocin spray will be investigated in children with ASD in the US [95]. Subjects will receive either probiotics, L. reuteri, or the placebo, vitamin C, for two phases of the first 12-week intervention. In the second phase, all subjects will receive an oxytocin spray accompanied by the original probiotic/ placebo intervention for further 12 weeks. Primary outcomes of this trial are social communication and behavior assessments. The level of oxytocin in blood will be analyzed as the secondary outcome.
According to the registered information, different species and strains of probiotics have been used in individual trials (Table 4). Either multiple strains or single strains of probiotics were reported to exhibit beneficial effects on children with ASD [88,93]. Safety assessment was the primary outcome for the administration of BB-12 + LGG to children with ASD in more than one trial. Probiotic products with the same formulation but different names (Vivomixx and Visbiome) may be expected to produce similar results in ASD trials. Currently, limited data are available that reveal the effects of probiotics on patients with ASD.
5.2. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
ADHD is a brain disorder of which the most common symptoms are inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. In Table 5, we summarized the effects of psychobiotics on ADHD. According to Pärtty and colleagues, infants who received L. rhamnosus GG exhibited a reduced risk of developing ADHD [96]. As shown in one case study, Truehope GreenBAC improves the mood and energy levels of patients with ADHD [97]. In addition, food supplement treatments containing L. acidophilus improve the self-control and attention of children with ADHD [98].
Table 5.
Psychobiotics reported for ADHD.
| Study model | Psychobiotics, dosage and route of administration | Duration of probiotics administration | Test | Observation summary | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infants N = 75 |
L. rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) 1 × 1010 CFU/day |
6 months |
|
Incidence of ADHD later in childhood ↓ B. species bacteria in feces ↓ |
[96] |
| A 24-year-old female with ADHD | Truehope GreenBAC: 1. L. rhamnosus A 2. L. delbrueckii sub. ulgaricusb 3. L. rhamnosus B 4. B. longum 5. L. acidophilus 6. B. breve 7. L. casei 8. S. thermophiles Two capsule/day |
2 months |
|
Improved mood and energy levels Candida infection ↓ |
[97] |
| Children with AD/HD N = 10 group |
L. acidophilus | 4 weeks |
|
Prudence, consistency, and stamina ↑ Vigilance, focus, and speed ↑ Auditory Response, Visual Response, Auditory Attention and Visual Attention ↑ |
[98] |
ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases; MADRS: Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; CAARS: Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale; IVA/CPT: Intermediate Visual and Auditory/Continuous Performance Test; FSRCQ: Full Scale Response Control Quotient; FSACR: Full Scale Attention Control Quotient; DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition; CPRS-R:L: Conner’s Parent Rating Scale - Revised: Long Form.
An ongoing double-blind, placebo-controlled study is being conducted to investigate the effect of probiotic supplements on students with ADHD. The primary outcome will be assessed on symptoms of attention deficit (MOXO test) after 6 months of probiotic intake [99].
5.3. Tourette syndrome (TS)
TS is a neurological disorder that are typically first observed in childhood [100]. The clinical treatments of TS include behavioral treatments, α2-adrenergic agonists, antipsychotics, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) [101,102]. According to one recent case report, a fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) dramatically ameliorates TS 8 weeks after the treatment [103].
Another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is recruiting patients to elucidate the effect of PS128 on TS [104]. The primary outcome will be measured using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) after 2 months of intervention.
6. Others
6.1. Insomnia
Sleep deficit has been found to induce depression, memory impairment and allergy [105–107]. Only a few reports found that using fermented products showed sleep improvements [108]. In Table 6, we summarized the effects of psychobiotics on insomnia. Two studies evaluated the effect of heat-killed L. brevis SBC8803 (SBL88™) on improving sleep in mice and humans. Miyazaki and colleagues reported decreased non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep during the active phase and enhanced NREM sleep during the resting phase following the administration of probiotics. Moreover, heat-killed L. brevis SBC8803 increased the duration of wakefulness and nighttime wheel-running activity [109]. As shown in the study by Nakakita et al., healthy male subjects consuming heat-killed L. brevis SBC8803 reported improved “walking” sleep journal scores. Furthermore, delta power values were increased in subjects aged 40 years compared with the placebo control. However, no significant effect was found on heat-killed L. brevis SBC8803 administration to quality of sleep (the electroencephalograms (EEG) and the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS)) [110]. One study focused on the effect of fermented milk containing L. helveticus CM4 on sleep in healthy elderly subjects [111]. The intake of fermented milk significantly improved sleep efficiency and wakening episodes. No significant changes in health status and well-being of subjects (short form 36 (SF-36) health survey scores) were observed after the probiotic intervention.
Table 6.
Psychobiotics reported for insomnia.
| Study model | Psychobiotics, dosage and route of administration | Duration of probiotics administration | Test | Observation summary | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Japanese male subjects (Age 41–69 years) N = 17 |
Heat-killed L. brevis SBC8803 (SBL88™) capsule/day | 10 days |
|
AIS and EEG: NA Sleep journal scores: Waking, turning over, and tooth grinding ↓ Delta power value in 40s subjects ↑ |
[110] |
| C3H-HeN mice N = 6 per group |
Heat-killed L. brevis SBC8803 | 4 weeks |
|
Nighttime wheel-running activity and duration of wakefulness ↑ NREM sleep during the active phase ↓ The duration of NREM sleep during the resting phase ↑ |
[109] |
| Healthy elderly subjects (Age: 60–81 years) N = 29 |
Fermented milk with L. helveticus CM4 | 3 + 3 weeks |
|
Improvement of sleep efficiency and number of wakening episodes SF-36 scores: NA |
[111] |
NA: not applicable; BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; BAI: Beck Anxiety Inventory; AIS: Athens Insomnia Scale; EEG: Electroencephalograms; EMG: Electromyographic; NREM: Non-rapid eye movement; SF-36: Short Form 36.
7. Conclusion
An increasing number of reports have emerged and provided evidence for the effects of psychobiotics on psychiatric disorders. Some of single or multiple strains can improve CNS functions, including mood, anxiety, depression, and the stress response, which are mediated by modulating inflammation, the HPA and neurotransmitters. Furthermore, the psychobiotic treatments have shown promising effects on neurodegenerative and neuro-developmental disorders by altering the fecal microbiota, inflammation, oxidative state and insulin function. Probiotics may play a crucial role to regulate the aggregation of α-synuclein in enteroendocrine cells, production of microbial metabolites and activation of the vagus nerve in neurodegenerative and neuro-developmental disorders. Thus, psychobiotic treatments could be a promising strategy to improve the quality of life for people who suffer from neurodegenerative and neuro-developmental disorders. Further studies in this area are needed to determine the effectiveness and mechanisms of psychobiotics in order for the psychobiotics to be considered as an alternative therapy for neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders.
Acknowledgement
This research was partially supported by BENED Biomedical Co., Ltd.
References
- 1. Luckey TD. Introduction to intestinal microecology. Am J Clin Nutr. 1972;25:1292–4. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, Samuel BS, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006;312:1355–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1124234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sarkar A, Lehto SM, Harty S, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, Burnet PWJ. Psychobiotics and the manipulation of bacteria-gut-brain signals. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39:763–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hooper LV, Littman DR, Macpherson AJ. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science. 2012;336:1268–73. doi: 10.1126/science.1223490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, Goodman AL, Gordon JI. Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature. 2011;474:327–36. doi: 10.1038/nature10213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013;500:541–6. doi: 10.1038/nature12506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444:1027–31. doi: 10.1038/nature05414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jumpertz R, Le DS, Turnbaugh PJ, Trinidad C, Bogardus C, Gordon JI, et al. Energy-balance studies reveal associations between gut microbes, caloric load, and nutrient absorption in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:58–65. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.010132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Aizawa E, Tsuji H, Asahara T, Takahashi T, Teraishi T, Yoshida S, et al. Possible association of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in the gut microbiota of patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2016;202:254–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Huang R, Wang K, Hu J. Effect of probiotics on depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2016;8 doi: 10.3390/nu8080483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wallace CJK, Milev R. The effects of probiotics on depressive symptoms in humans: a systematic review. Ann Gen Psychiatr. 2017;16:14. doi: 10.1186/s12991-017-0138-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Vogt NM, Kerby RL, Dill-McFarland KA, Harding SJ, Merluzzi AP, Johnson SC, et al. Gut microbiome alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7:13537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13601-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Keshavarzian A, Green SJ, Engen PA, Voigt RM, Naqib A, Forsyth CB, et al. Colonic bacterial composition in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1351–60. doi: 10.1002/mds.26307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kang DW, Park JG, Ilhan ZE, Wallstrom G, Labaer J, Adams JB, et al. Reduced incidence of Prevotella and other fermenters in intestinal microflora of autistic children. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sucksdorff M, Lehtonen L, Chudal R, Suominen A, Joelsson P, Gissler M, et al. Preterm birth and poor fetal growth as risk factors of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e599–608. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Cenit MC, Nuevo IC, Codoner-Franch P, Dinan TG, Sanz Y. Gut microbiota and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: new perspectives for a challenging condition. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;26:1081–92. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-0969-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Carabotti M, Scirocco A, Maselli MA, Severi C. The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015;28:203–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Experiments and observations on the gastric juice, and the physiology of digestion. Med Chir Rev. 1835;22:49–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zhou L, Foster JA. Psychobiotics and the gut-brain axis: in the pursuit of happiness. Neuropsychiatric Dis Treat. 2015;11:715–23. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S61997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Burokas A, Moloney RD, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Microbiota regulation of the Mammalian gut-brain axis. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2015;91:1–62. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Crumeyrolle-Arias M, Jaglin M, Bruneau A, Vancassel S, Cardona A, Dauge V, et al. Absence of the gut microbiota enhances anxiety-like behavior and neuroendocrine response to acute stress in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;42:207–17. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Buffington SA, Di Prisco GV, Auchtung TA, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Costa-Mattioli M. Microbial reconstitution reverses maternal diet-induced social and synaptic deficits in offspring. Cell. 2016;165:1762–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Dinan TG, Stanton C, Cryan JF. Psychobiotics: a novel class of psychotropic. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;74:720–6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lu Y, Christian K, Lu B. BDNF: a key regulator for protein synthesis-dependent LTP and long-term memory? Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2008;89:312–23. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Heldt SA, Stanek L, Chhatwal JP, Ressler KJ. Hippocampus-specific deletion of BDNF in adult mice impairs spatial memory and extinction of aversive memories. Mol Psychiatr. 2007;12:656–70. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Martinowich K, Lu B. Interaction between BDNF and serotonin: role in mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:73–83. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, Yu XN, et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol. 2004;558:263–75. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Silverman MN, Sternberg EM. Glucocorticoid regulation of inflammation and its functional correlates: from HPA axis to glucocorticoid receptor dysfunction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1261:55–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06633.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Dowlati Y, Herrmann N, Swardfager W, Liu H, Sham L, Reim EK, et al. A meta-analysis of cytokines in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;67:446–57. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. O’Mahony SM, Clarke G, Borre YE, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain-gutmicrobiome axis. Behav Brain Res. 2015;277:32–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Schousboe A, Waagepetersen HS. GABA: homeostatic and pharmacological aspects. Prog Brain Res. 2007;160:9–19. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)60002-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Barrett E, Ross RP, O’Toole PW, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C. gamma-Aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113:411–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Roshchina VV. New trends and perspectives in the evolution of neurotransmitters in microbial, plant, and animal cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;874:25–77. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20215-0_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Yano JM, Yu K, Donaldson GP, Shastri GG, Ann P, Ma L, et al. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell. 2015;161:264–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Liu YW, Liu WH, Wu CC, Juan YC, Wu YC, Tsai HP, et al. Psychotropic effects of Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 in early life-stressed and naive adult mice. Brain Res. 2016;1631:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Liu WH, Yang CH, Lin CT, Li SW, Cheng WS, Jiang YP, et al. Genome architecture of Lactobacillus plantarum PS128, a probiotic strain with potential immunomodulatory activity. Gut Pathog. 2015;7:22. doi: 10.1186/s13099-015-0068-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Liang S, Wang T, Hu X, Luo J, Li W, Wu X, et al. Administration of Lactobacillus helveticus NS8 improves behavioral, cognitive, and biochemical aberrations caused by chronic restraint stress. Neuroscience. 2015;310:561–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Savignac HM, Kiely B, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Bifidobacteria exert strain-specific effects on stress-related behavior and physiology in BALB/c mice. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2014;26:1615–27. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savignac HM, Dinan TG, et al. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:16050–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102999108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bercik P, Verdu EF, Foster JA, Macri J, Potter M, Huang X, et al. Chronic gastrointestinal inflammation induces anxiety-like behavior and alters central nervous system biochemistry in mice. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:2102–21012e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Desbonnet L, Garrett L, Clarke G, Kiely B, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Effects of the probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis in the maternal separation model of depression. Neuroscience. 2010;170:1179–88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Allen AP, Hutch W, Borre YE, Kennedy PJ, Temko A, Boylan G, et al. Bifidobacterium longum 1714 as a translational psychobiotic: modulation of stress, electrophysiology and neurocognition in healthy volunteers. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e939. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Mohammadi AA, Jazayeri S, Khosravi-Darani K, Solati Z, Mohammadpour N, Asemi Z, et al. The effects of probiotics on mental health and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in petrochemical workers. Nutr Neurosci. 2016;19:387–95. doi: 10.1179/1476830515Y.0000000023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Messaoudi M, Lalonde R, Violle N, Javelot H, Desor D, Nejdi A, et al. Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects. Br J Nutr. 2011;105:755–64. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510004319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Messaoudi M, Violle N, Bisson JF, Desor D, Javelot H, Rougeot C. Beneficial psychological effects of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in healthy human volunteers. Gut Microb. 2011;2:256–61. doi: 10.4161/gmic.2.4.16108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lactobacillus Plantarum PS128 in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and High Level of Inflammation. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03237078 .
- 47.Effects of Probiotics on Mood. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03539263 .
- 48.Effect of Lactobacillus Plantarum 299v Supplementation on Major Depression Treatment. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02469545 .
- 49.The Probiotic Study: Using Bacteria to Calm Your Mind. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02711800 .
- 50.Probiotics and Examination-related Stress in Healthy Medical Students. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03427515 .
- 51.Effects of Probiotics on Symptoms of Depression. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03277586 .
- 52.Probiotics, Brain Structure and Psychological Variables. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03478527 .
- 53. Li Y, Hao Y, Fan F, Zhang B. The role of microbiome in insomnia, circadian disturbance and depression. Front Psychiatr. 2018;9:669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Vanuytsel T, van Wanrooy S, Vanheel H, Vanormelingen C, Verschueren S, Houben E, et al. Psychological stress and corticotropin-releasing hormone increase intestinal permeability in humans by a mast cell-dependent mechanism. Gut. 2014;63:1293–9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Cani PD, Knauf C. How gut microbes talk to organs: the role of endocrine and nervous routes. Mol Metab. 2016;5:743–52. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Foster JA, Rinaman L, Cryan JF. Stress & the gut-brain axis: regulation by the microbiome. Neurobiol Stress. 2017;7:124–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Costedio MM, Hyman N, Mawe GM. Serotonin and its role in colonic function and in gastrointestinal disorders. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:376–88. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0763-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Wrase J, Reimold M, Puls I, Kienast T, Heinz A. Serotonergic dysfunction: brain imaging and behavioral correlates. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006;6:53–61. doi: 10.3758/cabn.6.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kumar A, Singh A, Ekavali A review on Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology and its management: an update. Pharmacol Rep. 2015;67:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Agahi A, Hamidi GA, Daneshvar R, Hamdieh M, Soheili M, Alinaghipour A, et al. Does severity of Alzheimer’s disease contribute to its responsiveness to modifying gut microbiota? A double blind clinical trial. Front Neurol. 2018;9:662. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Leblhuber F, Steiner K, Schuetz B, Fuchs D, Gostner JM. Probiotic supplementation in patients with Alzheimer’s dementia - an explorative intervention study. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15:1106–13. doi: 10.2174/1389200219666180813144834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Bonfili L, Cecarini V, Cuccioloni M, Angeletti M, Berardi S, Scarpona S, et al. SLAB51 probiotic formulation activates SIRT1 pathway promoting antioxidant and neuroprotective effects in an AD mouse model. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55:7987–8000. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-0973-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Athari Nik Azm S, Djazayeri A, Safa M, Azami K, Ahmadvand B, Sabbaghziarani F, et al. Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria ameliorate memory and learning deficits and oxidative stress in beta-amyloid (1–42) injected rats. Appl Physiol Nutr Metabol. 2018;43:718–26. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Athari Nik Azm S, Djazayeri A, Safa M, Azami K, Djalali M, Sharifzadeh M, et al. Probiotics improve insulin resistance status in an experimental model of Alzheimer’s disease. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:103. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Musa NH, Mani V, Lim SM, Vidyadaran S, Abdul Majeed AB, Ramasamy K. Lactobacilli-fermented cow’s milk attenuated lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation and memory impairment in vitro and in vivo. J Dairy Res. 2017;84:488–95. doi: 10.1017/S0022029917000620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Nimgampalle M, Kuna Y. Anti-Alzheimer properties of probiotic, Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 1325 in Alzheimer’s disease induced albino rats. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:KC01–5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26106.10428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Akbari E, Asemi Z, Daneshvar Kakhaki R, Bahmani F, Kouchaki E, Tamtaji OR, et al. Effect of probiotic supplementation on cognitive function and metabolic status in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, double-blind and controlled trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:256. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. de Rijk MC, Tzourio C, Breteler MM, Dartigues JF, Amaducci L, Lopez-Pousa S, et al. Prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease in Europe: the EUROPARKINSON collaborative study. European Community concerted action on the epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1997;62:10–5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.62.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Barichella M, Cereda E, Pezzoli G. Major nutritional issues in the management of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2009;24:1881–92. doi: 10.1002/mds.22705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Fasano A, Visanji NP, Liu LW, Lang AE, Pfeiffer RF. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:625–39. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Berg D, Postuma RB, Adler CH, Bloem BR, Chan P, Dubois B, et al. MDS research criteria for prodromal Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1600–11. doi: 10.1002/mds.26431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tamtaji OR, Taghizadeh M, Daneshvar Kakhaki R, Kouchaki E, Bahmani F, Borzabadi S, et al. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in people with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 73. Borzabadi S, Oryan S, Eidi A, Aghadavod E, Daneshvar Kakhaki R, Tamtaji OR, et al. The effects of probiotic supplementation on gene expression related to inflammation, insulin and lipid in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, PlaceboControlled trial. Arch Iran Med. 2018;21:289–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Barichella M, Pacchetti C, Bolliri C, Cassani E, Iorio L, Pusani C, et al. Probiotics and prebiotic fiber for constipation associated with Parkinson disease: an RCT. Neurology. 2016;87:1274–80. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Georgescu D, Ancusa OE, Georgescu LA, Ionita I, Reisz D. Nonmotor gastrointestinal disorders in older patients with Parkinson’s disease: is there hope? Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1601–8. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S106284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Cassani E, Privitera G, Pezzoli G, Pusani C, Madio C, Iorio L, et al. Use of probiotics for the treatment of constipation in Parkinson’s disease patients. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2011;57:117–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Effects of PS128 on Parkinsonian Symptoms. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03566589 .
- 78.Trial of Probiotics for Constipation in Parkinson’s Disease. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03377322 .
- 79. Taylor JM, Main BS, Crack PJ. Neuroinflammation and oxidative stress: co-conspirators in the pathology of Parkinson’s disease. Neurochem Int. 2013;62:803–19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2012.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Shults CW. Lewy bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:1661–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509567103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Liddle RA. Parkinson’s disease from the gut. Brain Res. 2018;1693:201–6. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Chandra R, Hiniker A, Kuo YM, Nussbaum RL, Liddle RA. alpha-Synuclein in gut endocrine cells and its implications for Parkinson’s disease. JCI Insight. 2017;2 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.92295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®) 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Wang LW, Tancredi DJ, Thomas DW. The prevalence of gastrointestinal problems in children across the United States with autism spectrum disorders from families with multiple affected members. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011;32:351–60. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31821bd06a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Probiotics for Quality of Life in Autism Spectrum Disorders. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02903030 .
- 86.Gut to Brain Interaction in Autism. Role of Probiotics on Clinical, Biochemical and Neurophysiological Parameters. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02708901 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 87.Efficacy of Vivomixx on Behaviour and Gut Function in Autism Spectrum Disorder. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03369431 .
- 88. Shaaban SY, El Gendy YG, Mehanna NS, El-Senousy WM, El-Feki HSA, Saad K, et al. The role of probiotics in children with autism spectrum disorder: a prospective, open-label study. Nutr Neurosci. 2018;21:676–81. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2017.1347746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Road to Discovery for Combination Probiotic BB-12 With LGG in Treating Autism Spectrum Disorder. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02674984 .
- 90.Combination Probiotic: BB-12 With LGG (Different Doses) in Treating Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03514784 .
- 91. RCT of Autism spectrum disorder and probiotics. 2018 [Google Scholar]
- 92.Investigation of WCFS1 on the gut microbiota of autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) children. 2012. [DOI]
- 93. Parracho HMRT, Gibson GR, Knott F, Bosscher D, Kleerebezem M, McCartney AL. A double-blind, placebocontrolled, crossover-designed probiotic feeding study in children diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorders. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics. 2010;5:69–74. [Google Scholar]
- 94. Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 on behavior activity of children with autism. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry [Internet] 2016 (ACTRN12616001002471) [Google Scholar]
- 95.Probiotics and Oxytocin Nasal Spray on Social Behaviors of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Children. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03337035 .
- 96. Partty A, Kalliomaki M, Wacklin P, Salminen S, Isolauri E. A possible link between early probiotic intervention and the risk of neuropsychiatric disorders later in childhood: a randomized trial. Pediatr Res. 2015;77:823–8. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Rucklidge JJ. Could yeast infections impair recovery from mental illness? A case study using micronutrients and olive leaf extract for the treatment of ADHD and depression. Adv Mind Body Med. 2013;27:14–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Harding KL, Judah RD, Gant C. Outcome-based comparison of Ritalin versus food-supplement treated children with AD/ HD. Altern Med Rev. 2003;8:319–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Probiotic Supplement as Treatment for Students With ADHD. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02908802 .
- 100. Rampello L, Alvano A, Battaglia G, Bruno V, Raffaele R, Nicoletti F. Tic disorders: from pathophysiology to treatment. J Neurol. 2006;253:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0008-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Murphy TK, Lewin AB, Storch EA, Stock S. American Academy of C, Adolescent Psychiatry Committee on Quality I. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with tic disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52:1341–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Weisman H, Qureshi IA, Leckman JF, Scahill L, Bloch MH. Systematic review: pharmacological treatment of tic disorders–efficacy of antipsychotic and alpha-2 adrenergic agonist agents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:1162–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Zhao H, Shi Y, Luo X, Peng L, Yang Y, Zou L. The effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on a Child with tourette syndrome. Case Rep Med. 2017;2017:6165239. doi: 10.1155/2017/6165239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.The Role of Probiotics PS128 in Movement Disorders. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03259971 .
- 105. Kaneita Y, Ohida T, Uchiyama M, Takemura S, Kawahara K, Yokoyama E, et al. The relationship between depression and sleep disturbances: a Japanese nationwide general population survey. J Clin Psychiatr. 2006;67:196–203. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Grundgeiger T, Bayen UJ, Horn SS. Effects of sleep deprivation on prospective memory. Memory. 2014;22:679–86. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.812220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Alper CM, Janicki-Deverts D, Turner RB. Sleep habits and susceptibility to the common cold. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:62–7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Kitaoka K, Uchida K, Okamoto N, Chikahisa S, Miyazaki T, Takeda E, et al. Fermented ginseng improves the first-night effect in humans. Sleep. 2009;32:413–21. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.3.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Miyazaki K, Itoh N, Yamamoto S, Higo-Yamamoto S, Nakakita Y, Kaneda H, et al. Dietary heat-killed Lactobacillus brevis SBC8803 promotes voluntary wheel-running and affects sleep rhythms in mice. Life Sci. 2014;111:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2014.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Nakakita Y, Tsuchimoto N, Takata Y, Nakamura T. Effect of dietary heat-killed Lactobacillus brevis SBC8803 (SBL88) on sleep: a non-randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled, and crossover pilot study. Benef Microbes. 2016;7:501–9. doi: 10.3920/BM2015.0118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Yamamura S, Morishima H, Kumano-go T, Suganuma N, Matsumoto H, Adachi H, et al. The effect of Lactobacillus helveticus fermented milk on sleep and health perception in elderly subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:100–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
