Al‐Shehri 2015.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Non‐blinded, parallel‐group, randomised controlled trial with 14 days duration of treatment and 2‐month duration of follow‐up | |
Participants |
Setting: tertiary referral centre, Saudi Arabia, January 2011 to December 2014 Sample size:
Primary/secondary therapy: primary therapy Participant (baseline) characteristics: age/sex (male, female)/hearing loss at start of therapy/start of treatment:
* not clarified whether this is SD or SEM Inclusion criteria: age > 18, unilateral sensorineural hearing loss that developed within 72 hours and was present for 2 weeks or less. Patients' pure tone average (PTA) must have been 50 dB or higher, and the affected ear must have been at least 30 dB worse than the contralateral ear in at least 1 of the 4 PTA frequencies (i.e. 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz). Exclusion criteria: hearing has been asymmetric prior to the onset of ISSNHL. Pre‐enrollment steroid usage, previous history of hearing loss, Ménière's disease, or any chronic inflammatory or suppurative ear disease or cholesteatoma, otosclerosis, ear surgery (except ventilating tubes), hearing asymmetry prior to onset, congenital hearing loss, physical trauma or barotrauma to the ear immediately preceding hearing loss, history of genetic hearing loss with strong family history, or craniofacial or temporal bone malformations. |
|
Interventions |
General comparison: intratympanic versus systemic corticosteroid therapy Intervention group (n = 19*): "intratympanic therapy": intratympanic methylprednisolone sodium succinate 4 x 1 mL doses of 40 mg/mL over 2 weeks, with a dose given every 3 to 4 days Comparator group (n = 20*): "systemic therapy": oral prednisone 60 mg/d tapering over 14 days Use of additional interventions (common to both treatment arms): none *intention‐to‐treat analysis |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome measure:
Secondary outcomes:
Primary endpoint for hearing threshold evaluation: 75 days Used PTA: 4PTA (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) |
|
Funding sources | No information available | |
Declarations of interest | None declared | |
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "[Patients] were consecutively randomized" Method of random sequence generation is not described. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of concealment is not described. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Open‐label trial, no blinding. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "The researcher was not blinded to the treatment group but the audiologists were blinded to it." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing outcome data reported. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No indication of selective reporting in the outcome parameters addressed by the review. |
Other bias | High risk | No sample size calculation performed. Treatment delay from onset in patients not reported. Single authorship generally exhibits a certain risk of bias. Completely equal baseline PTA is notable. |