Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 22;2022(7):CD008080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008080.pub2

Battaglia 2008.

Study characteristics
Methods Double‐blind, parallel‐group randomised controlled trial with 3 weeks duration of treatment and 7 weeks duration of follow‐up
Participants Setting: multicentre trial, USA, January 2004 to January 2006
Sample size:
  • Number randomised: 60

  • Number completed: 51


Primary/secondary therapy: primary therapy
Participant (baseline) characteristics: age/sex (male, female)/hearing loss at start of therapy/start of treatment/baseline SDS:
  • Group I (intratympanic): 60 y/m,f not reported/82 ± 28 dB HL/11 ± 14 d/24 ± 38%

  • Group II (combined): 57 y/m,f not reported/75 ± 23 dB HL/4 ± 3 d/41 ± 40%

  • Group III (systemic): 54 y/m,f not reported/80 ± 27 dB HL/7 ± 6 d/34 ± 40%


Inclusion criteria: ISSNHL within 6 weeks after onset. Patients with no identifiable cause of sudden hearing loss were considered to have ISSNHL.
Exclusion criteria: diagnosis not ISSNHL, pregnancy, receiving previous treatment, Ménière's disease, autoimmune hearing loss, acoustic neuroma or other retrocochlear lesions. History of hearing fluctuation, recent ear infection, surgery or hospitalisation, exposure to ototoxins, trauma, drainage, tinnitus, pain, vertigo or family history of hearing loss. Medical conditions associated with sudden hearing loss such as diabetes, syphilis, chronic renal disease and cardiovascular disease.
Interventions General comparison: intratympanic versus combined versus systemic corticosteroid therapy
Intervention group I (n = 17*): "intratympanic therapy": placebo oral + intratympanic injection of dexamethasone, 12 mg/mL, 0.5 to 0.7 mL, 20 min, 3 injections total, 1x per week
Intervention group II (n = 16*): "combined therapy": intratympanic injection + oral as in intervention group I and comparator group
Comparator group (n = 18*): "systemic therapy": oral 60 mg prednisone with 10 mg taper every 2 days + intratympanic NaCl 0.9% (intratympanic placebo), 3 injections total, 1x per week
Use of additional interventions (common to all treatment arms): none
*modified intention‐to‐treat analysis
Outcomes Primary outcome measure:
  • Change in hearing threshold with pure tone audiometry


Secondary outcomes:
  • Proportion of patients whose hearing is improved (criterion of improvement > 15 dB decrease in PTA or > 25% in SDS) and change in hearing threshold with speech audiometry

  • Adverse events


Primary endpoint for hearing threshold evaluation: 43 days
Used PTA: 3PTA (0.5, 1, 2 kHz)
Funding sources No information available
Declarations of interest No information provided
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "patients were randomized to 1 of 3 groups and administered treatment in double‐blinded fashion"
Method of random sequence generation is not described.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of concealment is not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: "administered treatment in double‐blinded fashion".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Not mentioned but placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study design.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Rate of reported missing outcome data more than 10% (15%).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Missing standard deviation in reporting of hearing improvement.
Other bias High risk Recruitment of patients was terminated before number of patients from sample size calculation was reached.
Wide range of treatment delay from onset in inclusion criteria.
Difference in treatment delay from onset between groups.