Hong 2009.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Non‐blinded, parallel‐group randomised controlled trial with 8 days duration of treatment and 3‐month duration of follow‐up | |
Participants |
Setting: tertiary referral centre, Republic of Korea, May 2007 to January 2009 Sample size:
Primary/secondary therapy: primary therapy Participant (baseline) characteristics: age/sex (male, female)/baseline hearing loss at start of therapy/start of treatment:
Inclusion criteria: ISSNHL of 30 dB or more with over 3 contiguous audiometric frequencies that occurred in fewer than 3 days Exclusion criteria: ISSNHL with vertigo, diabetes, Ménière’s disease, tumours, treatment onset of more than 15 days |
|
Interventions |
General comparison: intratympanic versus systemic corticosteroid therapy Intervention group (n = 32*): "intratympanic therapy": intratympanic injection of dexamethasone, 5 mg/mL, 0.3 to 0.4 mL, 8 injections total, 1 x per day Comparator group (n = 31*): "systemic therapy": oral prednisolone 60 mg per day for 4 days, 40 mg per day for 2 days and 20 mg per day for 2 days Use of additional interventions (only comparator group):"peripheral vasodilator" and Ginkgo biloba extract *per protocol analysis |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome measure:
Secondary outcomes:
Primary endpoint for hearing threshold evaluation: 90 days Used PTA: 4PTA (0.5, 1, 2, 3 kHz) |
|
Funding sources | Grant (code # 200810FTH010103002) from BioGreen21 Program, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea | |
Declarations of interest | None declared | |
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "IT dexamethasone or oral prednisolone, was assigned for patients with ISSHL alternatively and randomly." Method of random sequence generation is not described. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of concealment is not described. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Open‐label trial, no blinding. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "outcome assessors were blinded" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Rate of reported missing outcome data more than 10% (16%). |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No indication of selective reporting in the outcome parameters addressed by the review. |
Other bias | High risk | No sample size calculation performed. Standard deviation of treatment delay from onset not reported. |