Skip to main content
Communications Biology logoLink to Communications Biology
. 2022 Jul 22;5:725. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03681-6

Immunometabolic and potential tumor-promoting changes in 3D cervical cell models infected with bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria

Jason D Maarsingh 1, Paweł Łaniewski 2, Melissa M Herbst-Kralovetz 1,2,
PMCID: PMC9307755  PMID: 35869172

Abstract

Specific bacteria of the human microbiome influence carcinogenesis at diverse anatomical sites. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common vaginal disorder in premenopausal women that is associated with gynecologic sequelae, including cervical cancer. BV-associated microorganisms, such as Fusobacterium, Lancefieldella, Peptoniphilus, and Porphyromonas have been associated with gynecologic and other cancers, though the pro-oncogenic mechanisms employed by these bacteria are poorly understood. Here, we integrated a multi-omics approach with our three-dimensional (3-D) cervical epithelial cell culture model to investigate how understudied BV-associated bacteria linked to gynecologic neoplasia influence hallmarks of cancer in vitro. Lancefieldella parvulum and Peptoniphilus lacrimalis elicited robust proinflammatory responses in 3-D cervical cells. Fusobacterium nucleatum and Fusobacterium gonidiaformans modulated metabolic hallmarks of cancer corresponding to accumulation of 2-hydroxyglutarate, pro-inflammatory lipids, and signs of oxidative stress and genotoxic hydrogen sulfide. This study provides mechanistic insights into how gynecologic cancer-associated bacteria might facilitate a tumor-promoting microenvironment in the human cervix.

Subject terms: Cervical cancer, Cytokines, Bacterial infection, Mechanisms of disease, Metabolomics


Metabolomics of 3D cervical cell cultures infected with bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV) provides insights into how BV-associated bacteria may facilitate a tumour-promoting microenvironment.

Introduction

In recent decades, specific bacteria have been shown to employ numerous mechanisms that promote carcinogenesis in a variety of cancers. Helicobacter pylori, a primary mediator of stomach cancer, was the first bacterium described to be associated with a specific cancer1. Fusobacterium nucleatum is often found in the gut and is highly correlated with colorectal cancer2. In the oral cavity, Porphyromonas gingivalis supports oral neoplasia3,4. In addition to specific microorganisms, growing evidence supports a causal role of dysbiosis of the human microbiota in cancer development5. Recently, we reviewed the key bacteria linked to gynecologic cancer6 and found that mechanistic in vitro studies are needed to elucidate the pathogenic and pro-oncogenic mechanisms employed by these understudied bacterial species in the female reproductive tract (FRT).

Cervicovaginal dysbiosis or bacterial vaginosis (BV) is characterized by depletion of health-associated lactobacilli accompanied by overgrowth of a polymicrobial consortium of anaerobic bacteria7. Importantly, BV, the most common genital infection, has been associated with serious gynecologic and obstetric sequelae, such as preterm birth, pelvic inflammatory disease, and cervical cancer6. Cervicovaginal dysbiosis and BV confer increased susceptibility to infection with oncogenic HPV genotypes, genital inflammation, and cervical neoplasia8,9. Next-generation sequencing of the microbiota in the upper and lower FRT has revealed specific bacteria associated with gynecologic cancers6, frequently in the clinical setting of BV or cervicovaginal dysbiosis. Yet, these species are often detected at relatively low levels in the lower FRT. Recent meta-analyses based on both cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical studies have provided links between cervicovaginal dysbiosis, persistent HPV infection, and cervical carcinogenesis10,11. Our group and others have demonstrated that bacteria belonging to the order Fusobacteriales (F. nucleatum, Fusobacterium necrophorum, and Sneathia spp.) are associated with HPV infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive cervical carcinoma8,1214. Notably, Sneathia spp. are emerging pathogens and frequently present in women diagnosed with BV6,15. In addition to cervical cancer, two cross-sectional clinical studies have evaluated the microbiome of women with endometrial cancer relative to benign controls. Co-colonization of Fannyhessea vaginae (formerly classified as Atopobium vaginae) with Porphyromonas sp. and Peptoniphilus were associated with endometrial cancer16. However, these limited studies need to be confirmed and expanded in clinical studies with greater patient enrollment. Despite the strong clinical data linking BV to HPV infection and cervical carcinogenesis, the pathogenic mechanisms exploited by BV-associated bacteria (BVAB) to facilitate a pro-carcinogenic cervicovaginal microenvironment remain poorly understood. By coupling advanced in vitro cell culture models and omics technologies, we can investigate the pro-carcinogenic mechanisms exploited by these BVAB.

In this study, we used our well-characterized and physiologically relevant three-dimensional (3-D) human cervical epithelial cell model based on the rotating-wall vessel technology to investigate host-bacterial interactions and provide the foundation to reveal pro-carcinogenic mechanisms1720. The 3-D human model recapitulates in vivo characteristics of parental tissue, such as apical polarization, expression of Toll-like receptors and mucins, and formation of microvilli and intercellular tight junctions that are absent or weakly present in conventional monolayer cultures17,18, thus allowing us to more accurately dissect host-microbe interactions and hallmarks of cancer. Furthermore, 3-D cervical cells generate innate immune responses to microbial products and infection with STI pathogens and BVAB that recapitulate clinical responses and findings17,1923. We hypothesize that BVAB associated with gynecologic cancers induces hallmarks of cancer corresponding to inflammation and oncogenic metabolomes that may create a tumor-promoting microenvironment. We have recently studied the immunometabolic influences of health-associated cervicovaginal bacteria (Lactobacillus crispatus) and specific BVAB more frequently associated with BV (Gardnerella vaginalis, Fannyhessea vaginae, Prevotella bivia, Sneathia amnii, and Megasphaera)22,23. In this report, we utilized a similar multi-omics approach to investigate inflammatory, metabolic, and tumor-promoting properties of five understudied BVAB isolated from the lower FRT and reported to be associated with inflammation and cancer. This study revealed pro-inflammatory and metabolic changes (hallmarks of cancer) elicited by understudied BVAB that may promote carcinogenesis in the human FRT.

Results

BVAB associated with cancer exert species-specific cytotoxicity against cervical cell monolayers and colonize 3-D cervical cells

We first screened BVAB associated with cancer in cervical cell monolayers. Cell monolayer cultures were infected with Lancefieldella parvula (formerly classified as Atopobium parvulum), Fusobacterium gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, Peptoniphilus lacrimalis, and Porphyromonas uenonis at three doses corresponding to final optical densities at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 per 1 × 105 cervical cells/mL. Using trypan blue exclusion staining, we found that all strains except L. parvula induced modest cytotoxicity at all doses tested (Supplementary Fig. 1). L. parvula induced the greatest cytotoxicity at the highest infection dose, indicated by a 70% decrease in cervical cell viability. F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, P. lacrimalis, and P. uenonis induced significant (p < 0.05) cytotoxicity at high and medium doses; however, cervical cell viability decreased less than 20% relative to mock-infected (PBS-treated) controls. These data demonstrate that in cervical cell monolayer cultures, L. parvula exerts the greatest cytotoxic potential relative to F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, P. lacrimalis, and P. uenonis.

We used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to confirm that tested BVAB (L. parvula, F. gondiaformans, F. nucleatum, P. lacrimalis, and P. uenonis) colonize 3-D cervical epithelial cells (Fig. 1). Mock-infected (PBS-treated) 3-D cervical cells were also imaged and displayed a characteristic cobblestone appearance, apical polarity, and were covered with microvilli, as previously described17. All BVAB tested colonized 3-D cervical cells, although relative abundances and spatial adherence differed between species. L. parvula colonized the 3-D cervical cells in small clusters and were often found to be associated with necrotic cellular debris in multiple microscopy fields and micrographs. F. gonidiaformans adhered to healthy cells in close proximity to necrotic cell debris. F. nucleatum also efficiently colonized 3-D cervical cells and formed long filamentous structures occasionally associated with extracellular material. P. lacrimalis colonized 3-D cervical cells as dispersed cocci and were found as isolated or diploid cocci. P. uenonis colonized the surface and crevices between 3-D cervical cells to an intermediate degree relative to other BVAB tested and were mostly found in small clusters in multiple fields and images (representative micrograph shown). The SEM analysis confirmed that the BVAB tested in this study colonized 3-D cervical cells in species-specific patterns.

Fig. 1. BVAB colonize 3-D cervical cells.

Fig. 1

Mock-infected 3-D cervical cells (upper left) demonstrating cobblestone appearance and apical polarity. L. parvula (upper middle) forms small coccobacilli clusters and colonize healthy cells, as well as necrotic cell material (upper right corner of the micrograph). F. gonidiaformans (upper right) colonizes the smooth face of 3-D cervical cells in clusters. F. nucleatum (lower left) forms long, filamentous, rugged rod structures that broadly colonize 3-D cervical cells. P. lacrimalis (bottom middle) colonizes 3-D cervical cells mostly as pairs or isolated cocci. P. uenonis (lower right) appears as short bacilli that colonize the surface and crevices of 3-D cervical cells, often in small clusters. All bacteria were processed in PBS and adjusted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 5.0. Human 3-D cervical cells were infected with bacterial suspensions (20 μl per 1 × 105 epithelial cells) for 4 h under anaerobic conditions and processed for SEM analysis.

BVAB associated with cancer induces pro-inflammatory or anti-chemotactic responses in 3-D cervical cells and modulate tumor biomarkers associated with apoptosis

To evaluate the immunomodulatory potential of BVAB associated with gynecologic cancers, we used cytometric bead arrays to measure 15 secreted proteins corresponding to cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors in culture supernatants of 3-D cervical cells infected with L. parvula, F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, P. lacrimalis, or P. uenonis. Hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) of immunoproteomic profiles demonstrated that F. gonidiaformans and F. nucleatum grouped closely together (Fig. 2), suggesting a shared mechanism of immunomodulatory action within the Fusobacterium genus; however, both Fusobacterium species also shared a parent cluster with mock-infected controls, indicating a relatively modest immunomodulatory potential by these species. P. uenonis clustered separately from all other infections (Fig. 2) indicating this species elicits unique immune responses from 3-D cervical cells relative to all other BVAB tested. L. parvula and P. lacrimalis clustered together and induced the greatest pro-inflammatory response relative to all tested BVAB. The immunoproteomic profiles also demonstrated that BVAB associated with gynecologic cancers share a core pro-inflammatory response mediated through upregulated expression of IL-1β. All species except P. uenonis upregulated the expression of IL-6 and IL-8.

Fig. 2. P. lacrimalis and L. parvula elicits 3-D cervical cell pro-inflammatory responses while P. uenonis dampens the chemotactic response, possibly to evade immune clearance.

Fig. 2

Heatmaps displaying relative concentrations of 3-D human cervical cell secretion profiles of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, cancer biomarkers, and matrix metalloproteinases. Hierarchical clustering of immunoproteomic targets (rows) and treatments (columns) were calculated using Euclidean distance measures and average linkage clustering algorithms. The data were log-transformed and autoscaled prior to clustering. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (infection vs. mock-infected controls). All bacteria were processed in PBS and adjusted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5. Human 3-D cervical cells were infected with bacterial suspensions (20 μl per 1 × 105 epithelial cells) for 24 h under anaerobic conditions. A minimum of n = 3 independent replicates were performed and measured for each condition with two technical replicates measured within each condition. Cell culture supernatants were used for Bio-Plex analysis.

In contrast, P. uenonis dampened pro-inflammatory and chemotactic responses, which may promote evasion of clearance by innate and adaptive immune cells. Infection with P. uenonis significantly (p < 0.05) downregulated the expression of four chemokines: interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), macrophage inflammatory protein-1β (MIP-1β), fractalkine, regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2). These results demonstrate that, when compared to other tested BVAB species, P. uenonis suppresses chemotactic cytokine expression in 3-D cervical cells, which may serve to promote chronic infection.

The genera and species tested in this study has been previously associated with gynecologic cancers12,16,24, thus we quantify soluble cancer biomarkers (known to be produced by the A2 cervical cell line) associated with apoptosis, metastatic potential, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) from culture supernatants. The 3-D cervical cells infected with F. gonidiaformans significantly upregulated expression of the immunosuppressive TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) protein (p = 0.0305) (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3). The 3-D cervical cells infected with L. parvula upregulated expression of the immunosuppressive sFasL (p = 0.0240) protein (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3). We found no significant differences in the secretion of four MMPs (MMP-1 MMP-7, MMP-9, and MMP-10) in response to all infections, suggesting that MMP secretion by 3-D cervical cells may be mediated by alternative mechanisms (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Untargeted metabolomics reveals global alterations in amino acid, lipid, and nucleotide metabolism in 3-D cervical cell cultures infected with BVAB

To gain insights into how BVAB associated with gynecologic cancer modulate the metabolic landscape, we performed untargeted metabolomics on culture supernatants collected from 3-D cervical cells infected with L. parvula, F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, P. lacrimalis, or P. uenonis. Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, we identified a total of 314 metabolites with a known identity. Metabolic profiles of BVAB were distinct from mock-infected controls, as visualized by principal component analysis (PCA) (Fig. 3a). Principal component 1 (PC1) explained 24.9% of the total variance and all infections were significantly (p < 0.001) separated from mock-infected controls. PC2 explained 14.3% of variance and infection with L. parvula, P. lacrimalis, and P. uenonis significantly (p < 0.001) separated from mock-infected controls. Unsupervised HCA grouped F. gonidiaformans and F. nucleatum into a separate cluster from all other samples (Fig. 3b), suggesting these species modulate metabolomes in a similar manner.

Fig. 3. BV-associated bacteria (BVAB) induce distinct metabolomic profiles from mock-infected controls and immunomodulatory signatures of lipids and amino acids.

Fig. 3

a Principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrates that F. nucleatum and F. gonidiaformans induce similar and partially overlapping metabolic profiles that cluster separately from mock-infected controls. PC1 and PC2 scores were analyzed by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests. ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. b Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) of metabolite Z-scores from 3-D cervical cells infected with BVAB and mock-infected controls. HCA was performed using Euclidean distance and average linkage clustering on both rows (metabolites) and columns (treatments). c Venn diagrams indicating the number of unique or overlapping significantly (p < 0.05) accumulated or depleted metabolites (infection vs. mock-infected controls). d Pie charts represent the percent of significantly different (p < 0.05) metabolites (infection vs. mock-infected controls) relative to all metabolites in the superpathway (right). *p < 0.05; Chi-squared (χ2) analysis. Infection with BVAB induces global changes in metabolites corresponding to amino acid and lipid superpathways. All bacteria were processed in PBS and adjusted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5. Human 3-D cervical cells were infected with bacterial suspensions (20 μl per 1 × 105 epithelial cells) for 24 h under anaerobic conditions. A minimum of n = 3 independent replicates were performed and measured for each condition. Cell culture supernatants were used for global metabolomics analysis.

We next analyzed unique and shared metabolites among metabolic profiles of tested BVAB. Differential metabolite abundance was classified as accumulated (fold change >2) or depleted (fold change <0.5) between individual BVAB relative to mock-infected controls. No metabolite was significantly accumulated across all infectious treatments and only one metabolite (5-methylthioadenosine) was significantly depleted in all infections (Fig. 3c). F. gonidiaformans and F. nucleatum shared the greatest number of identical accumulated (18 total) and depleted (15 total) metabolites relative to mock-infected controls. This suggests genus-specific metabolic activity between both Fusobacterium species. Here, we define metabolic activity relative to the number of metabolites that were significantly (p < 0.05) different between BVAB and mock-infected controls. F. gonidiaformans exerted the greatest metabolic activity (123 altered metabolites) while infection with L. parvula exerted the least metabolic activity (13 metabolites) (Fig. 3d). P. lacrimalis (81 metabolites), P. uenonis (46 altered metabolites), and F. nucleatum (52 altered metabolites) all exhibited intermediate metabolic activity. Metabolites that were significantly altered by BVAB were then grouped by superpathway profiles (Fig. 3d). Superpathway analysis revealed significant differences between L. parvula and P. lacrimalis (p = 0.0159), L. parvula and P. uenonis (p = 0.0494), and between P. uenonis and F. nucleatum (p = 0.0111). Metabolites belonging to amino acid and lipid superpathways were substantially influenced by all BVAB tested. The global results of our untargeted metabolomics data suggest that the BVAB tested in this study modulates the in vitro metabolic extracellular microenvironment in a species- and genus-specific manner.

Random Forest analysis reveals the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate and metabolites associated with histidine degradation differentiate BVAB infections

To predict metabolites that differentiate infection with specific BVAB, we analyzed global untargeted metabolomes using Random Forest (RF) classification algorithms. The most predictive metabolites that differentiate infections belonged to the amino acid, nucleotide, and lipid superpathways (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, three of the top 15 predictive metabolites (imidazole propionate, formiminoglutamate, and trans-urocanate) were histidine catabolites. Additionally, the oncometabolite, 2-hydroxyglutarate25, was identified by the RF algorithm and was significantly accumulated following infection with L. parvula, F. gonidiaformans, and F. nucleatum (Fig. 5). These results provide additional evidence for the putative mechanisms by which these BVAB, and possibly other bacteria, may utilize to promote gynecologic carcinogenesis.

Fig. 4. Random Forest classification identifies metabolites within amino acid, nucleotide, and lipid superpathways that discriminate infections with BV-associated bacteria in 3-D cervical cells.

Fig. 4

a Metabolites most predictive of infection with L. parvula, F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, P. lacrimalis, and P. uenonis include acetylated amino acid derivatives (N-acetylasparagine and N1,N1-diacetylspermine), histidine catabolites (imidazole propionate, formiminoglutamate, and trans-urocanate), adenosine derivatives (3’-AMP and adenosine), glycerophospholipids (1-palmitoyl-2-oleyol-GPE and 1-stearoyl-2-oleoyl-GPE), oncometabolite (2-hydroxyglutarate), polyamines (MTA and agmatine), and short-chain fatty acids (2-hydroxybutyrate, butyrate/isobutyrate, and alpha-hydroxyisocaproate). Only significantly different metabolites (infection vs. mock-infected controls) are colored in the heat map. b Random Forest confusion matrix. Individual cells are labeled according to how the algorithm predicted each treatment. Uninfected mock controls and infection with F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, and P. uenonis were perfectly predicted. The number of replicates (n) included for each treatment are indicated in parentheses on the vertical axis labels.

Fig. 5. Extracellular supernatants of 3-D cervical cells infected with L. parvula, F. gonidiaformans, and F. nucleatum infections accumulate the oncometabolite, 2-hydroxyglutarate.

Fig. 5

Scaled metabolite abundances of 2-hydroxyglutarate after 24 h infection with BVAB. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001. Student’s two-tailed paired t-tests. Error bars represent standard deviation. A minimum of n = 3 independent replicates were performed and measured for each condition.

Random Forest analyses accurately (100%) predicted infection with F. gonidiaformans, P. uenonis, and all mock-infected control samples (Fig. 4b). In contrast, all F. nucleatum samples were incorrectly classified as F. gonidiaformans, suggesting strong metabolomic signatures shared between the Fusobacterium species tested. One L. parvula sample was incorrectly predicted as a mock-infected control, which may reflect the relatively low metabolic activity observed for this species. Using global untargeted metabolomics datasets, the RF classification algorithm could accurately discriminate between BVAB infections and identified metabolites that may influence a tumor-promoting cervicovaginal microenvironment.

BVAB modulates metabolic profiles indicative of histidine degradation

Three of the predictive metabolites identified by RF (imidazole propionate, formiminoglutamate, and trans-urocanate) are metabolites of the histidine catabolism pathway26 (Fig. 6). Each of these metabolites were significantly accumulated by infection with at least three BVAB relative to mock-infected controls. Histidine was depleted by infection with F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, and P. lacrimalis, although the results reached significance only between F. nucleatum and mock-infected controls. In regard to other metabolites belonging to the histidine catabolic pathway, α-ketoglutarate (a derivative of the sequential breakdown of trans-urocanate27) was significantly depleted following infection with F. nucleatum (p = 0.002). Additionally, the formiminoglutamate catabolite, glutamate27, was significantly (p < 0.05) elevated following infection with F. gonidiaformans and P. uenonis. These results suggest that the BVAB tested in this study modulate histidine degradative pathways in 3-D cervical cells28,29.

Fig. 6. BVAB modulates metabolic profiles corresponding to histidine degradation.

Fig. 6

a Select metabolites of the histidine degradation pathway (KEGG, M00045) corresponding to significantly accumulated or depleted metabolites in the graphs on the right. Graphs represent scaled metabolite abundances of b histidine, c trans-urocanate, d imidazole propionate, e formiminoglutmate, f alpha-ketoglutarate, and g glutamate. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. Two-tailed paired Student’s t-tests (infection vs. mock-infected controls). Box and whiskers bars show median and error bars represent standard error. A minimum of n = 3 independent replicates were performed and measured for each condition.

BVAB modulates extracellular metabolomic profiles corresponding to enrichment in cysteine and methionine, glutathione, and lipid metabolic pathways

To better understand the metabolic networks modulated by BVAB, we performed metabolic pathway enrichment analysis using datasets from individual BVAB relative to mock-infected controls. The KEGG database was used as a reference for metabolic pathway queries. A total of 41 metabolic pathways were significantly (p < 0.05) enriched between all comparisons, 13 of which participate in amino acid metabolism and four pathways participating in lipid metabolism. The cysteine and methionine metabolic pathway (KEGG entry hsa00270) was the only pathway significantly enriched in all infections (Supplementary Fig. 5). Butanoate metabolism (KEGG entry hsa00650) and arginine biosynthesis (KEGG entry hsa00220) were highly enriched by infection with F. gonidiaformans (6.71-fold enrichment), F. nucleatum (6.67-fold enrichment), and P. lacrimalis (3.78-fold enrichment). F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, and P. lacrimalis are known butyrate producers30,31, thus supporting our data. Metabolic pathways for glycerolipid metabolism (KEGG entry hsa00561) and sphingolipid metabolism (KEGG entry has00600) were also significantly (p < 0.05) enriched by infection with F. gonidiaformans. Glycerolipids and sphingolipids modulate inflammation and participate in carcinogenic signaling pathways and metastasis32,33. The metabolic pathway enrichment analysis supported the metabolic superpathway analyses (Fig. 3d) and provides insights into how BVAB associated with cancer may influence carcinogenesis.

F. gonidiaformans and F. nucleatum induce metabolic signatures corresponding to hydrogen sulfide production and oxidative stress

The cysteine and methionine metabolic pathway was significantly enriched by infection with all BVAB tested (Fig. 7a and Supplementary Fig. 5): L. parvula (2.84-fold; p = 0.015), F. gonidiaformans (5.47-fold; p < 0.0001), F. nucleatum (4.03-fold; p = 0.005), P. lacrimalis (3.67-fold; p = 0.004), and P. uenonis (3.24-fold; p < 0.0001), respectively (Supplementary Fig. 5). The glutathione metabolic pathway was also significantly (p < 0.0001) enriched following infection with F. gonidiaformans (4.94-fold enrichment) (Fig. 7a). The cysteine and methionine metabolic pathway (Fig. 7b) intersects with the glutathione metabolic pathway (Fig. 7c), the latter of which participates in oxidative stress responses. Both pathways share important metabolic intermediates. We searched our metabolomics datasets for differential accumulation or depletion of specific metabolites belonging to both the cysteine and methionine pathways and glutathione metabolism pathway. Infection with F. gonidiaformans and F. nucleatum induced differential abundance of metabolites associated with hydrogen sulfide production and oxidative stress. Hydrogen sulfide is generated by lanthionine biosynthesis, the latter of which was significantly accumulated by 78.26-fold by infection with F. gonidiaformans relative to mock-infected controls (Fig. 7d). Cysteine desulfuration generates serine and both were significantly (p < 0.05) depleted by infection with F. gonidiaformans, suggesting high flux through this pathway and hydrogen sulfide production. Increased metabolic flux through the glutathione pathway may suggest increased oxidative stress in the presence of Fusobacterium spp., while accumulation of hydrogen sulfide may predispose to host cell genotoxicity34.

Fig. 7. Fusobacterium spp. modulate metabolites associated with hydrogen sulfide production and oxidative stress.

Fig. 7

a Bubble plots representing enrichment of methionine and cysteine metabolism and glutathione metabolism from metabolomics data derived from 3-D cervical cells infected with BVAB. Bubble sizes are proportional to the enrichment factor and bubble colors indicate significance. b Methionine and cysteine metabolic pathway depicting hydrogen sulfide production (yellow circles). c Glutathione metabolic pathway that participates in the oxidative stress response. Asterisks next to metabolites are also represented in the heatmap. d Heatmap representing statistically different (p < 0.05) metabolites corresponding to methionine and cysteine metabolism and glutathione metabolism that were differentially accumulated (orange and yellow shading) or depleted (blue shading) during infection with Fusobacterium species. Fold change difference between infection with and mock-infected controls are indicated as numerical values within the heat map cells. A minimum of n = 3 independent replicates were performed and measured for each condition.

Fusobacterium spp. infections influence lipid metabolic profiles in 3-D cervical cell cultures

The global metabolomic profiles representing the BVAB tested in this study were enriched in metabolic pathways corresponding to glycerolipid metabolism, sphingolipid metabolism, and inositol phosphate metabolism (Supplementary Fig. 5). We, therefore, investigated the specific lipids that were significantly (p < 0.05) accumulated or depleted during infection with BVAB relative to mock-infected controls. Both Fusobacterium species elicited the greatest impact on differential lipid abundance. Infection with F. gonidiaformans and F. nucleatum resulted in alteration of 18 and 11 lipid species, respectively (Fig. 8). HCA analysis grouped F. gonidiaformans and F. nucleatum, suggesting these species may modulate lipid profiles in a similar manner (Fig. 8). F. gonidiaformans induced significant (p < 0.05) accumulation of several glycerophosphocholine (GPC) lipids (1-myristoyl-2-palmitoyl-GPC, 1-palmitoyl-2-palmitoleoyl-GPC, 1,2-dipalmitoyl-GPC, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-GPC, 1-oleoyl-2-linoleoyl-GPC) while both Fusobacterium spp. induced significant (p < 0.05) accumulation of 1-stearoyl-2-oleoyl-GPC (Fig. 8). Both Fusobacterium spp. also induced significant (p < 0.05) accumulation of three glycerophosphoethanolamine (GPE) lipids (1-stearoyl-2-oleoyl-GPE, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-GPE, and 1,2-dioleoyl-GPE). In support of this data, the GPE and GPC head groups corresponding to these lipids were significantly depleted during infection with Fusobacterium spp. L. parvula and P. uenonis clustered together and while these species generally induced glycerolipid and sphingolipid accumulation, only accumulation of palmitoyl dihydrosphingomyelin by L. parvula reached significance (p = 0.049) relative to mock-infected controls. P. lacrimalis grouped with mock-infected controls, suggesting this species does not regulate lipid metabolism to a significant extent. In summary, infection of 3-D cervical cells with Fusobacterium spp. resulted in the greatest influence on the differential abundance of sphingolipids and glycerolipids. Accumulation of extracellular lipids may suggest disruption of host cellular membranes, which reflect a compromised cervical epithelial barrier. These data may bear important implications related to how BVAB may generate a pro-inflammatory microenvironment and impact tumor-promoting signaling via alterations of lipid metabolism in the context of the human cervix.

Fig. 8. Fusobacterium spp. modulate glycerolipid and sphingolipid metabolism during 3-D cervical cell infection.

Fig. 8

Heatmap of extracellular sphingolipids, glycerolipids, and inositol phosphate metabolites differentially regulated by infection with BVAB. Metabolite intensity values were log-transformed, autoscaled, and row-centered prior to hierarchical clustering analysis using Euclidean distance measures and average linkage clustering algorithms. Asterisks indicate statistically different metabolites between infectious treatments and mock-infected controls. Only lipid species significantly different between at least on BVAB species and mock-infected controls are shown. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. Two-tailed paired Student’s t-tests. A minimum of n = 3 independent replicates were performed and measured for each condition.

Discussion

Hanahan and Weinberg initially described the hallmarks of cancer that influence the development and progression of cancerous lesions35,36. Hallmarks of cancer in the local microenvironment, such as inflammation, immunosuppression, and pro-oncogenic metabolites might also be influenced by the composition of the resident microbiota6,24. For example, F. nucleatum and H. pylori induce chronic inflammatory host responses that are implicated in the development of colorectal and gastric cancers, respectively1,37. P. gingivalis exerts immunosuppressive activity that downregulates host adaptive immune functions and may impair antitumoral clearance mechanisms38. Escherichia coli produces the oncometabolite, 2-hydroxyglutarate, thus potentially implicating this common member of the gut microbiota in colorectal carcinogenesis39. Defining the tumor-promoting mechanisms exploited by specific bacterial species at less studied anatomical sites, such as the FRT, is needed to fully understand how dysbiosis of the human microbiome promotes a carcinogenic microenvironment.

In this study, we explored the potential tumor-promoting immunometabolic mechanisms exploited by L. parvula, F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, P. lacrimalis, and P. uenonis. These BVAB have been associated with malignancy in the FRT and other anatomical sites8,12,16,24,40. F. gonidiaformans is closely related to F. necrophorum41 and has been recovered from women with BV42. L. parvula is related to the commonly isolated BVAB, F. vaginae7, the latter of which is associated with gynecologic cancers and inflammation16,20,43. Using SEM, we demonstrated that L. parvula, F. gonidiaformans, and F. nucleatum efficiently colonized 3-D cervical cells while P. lacrimalis and P. uenonis colonized less successfully (Fig. 1). Since BV is a polymicrobial infection, it is possible that P. lacrimalis and P. uenonis require early colonizers to efficiently adhere to the cervical epithelium. Our group and others hypothesize that cervicovaginal biofilms are initiated by Gardnerella and Prevotella species7, which provide biofilm scaffolds for secondary colonizers such as Porphyromonas, Peptoniphilus, and other BVAB species44. We found little evidence of cervical cell cytotoxicity in our 3-D and monolayer cultures, following infection with all species tested. This data suggests that these BVAB are not overtly cytotoxic in vitro, given that 3-D cervical cells are more robust against cytotoxic agents when compared to traditional monolayer cultures17.

It is well established that chronic inflammation induced by infectious agents, such as viruses and bacteria, can promote carcinogenesis36,45. For example, F. nucleatum facilitates colorectal carcinogenesis by upregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, immune cell recruitment, and cancer cell migration37. Persistent BV is also associated with chronic inflammation46 and is manifested through elevated cervicovaginal cytokines and chemokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-847. Chronic genital inflammation may improve HPV access to the basal cells of the cervical transition zone, thereby promoting HPV infection and a risk of the development of cervical neoplasia48.

Here, we found that L. parvula, F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, and P. lacrimalis stimulated a pro-inflammatory innate immune response in 3-D cervical cells corresponding to the upregulated secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 (Fig. 2). These pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines are often elevated in cervicovaginal lavages collected from women with BV relative to healthy controls42,49,50. Additionally, these markers were also induced in 3-D cervical cells in response to other BVAB or microbial compounds17,20,22. These immune mediators exert pro-carcinogenic properties. For example, IL-6 can stimulate angiogenesis51,52, inhibit apoptosis53, and suppress antitumor immune responses54. IL-8 is also frequently upregulated in the context of cervical cancer and promotes cell migration and proliferation in vitro55. Clinically, high IL-8 titers correspond to advanced-stage cervical neoplasia and poor survival rates56. Our group has demonstrated that human 3-D cervical models upregulate the expression of IL8 in response to infection with F. vaginae and S. amnii20,22, the latter of which is also associated with cervical cancer8,12,13. Vaginal and cervical epithelial cells also secrete chemokines to recruit innate and adaptive immune cells to the local microenvironment and clear infection17,19,57. Interestingly, P. uenonis significantly downregulated secretion of IP-10, RANTES, fractalkine, and MIP-1β by 3-D cervical cells, therefore suggesting suppression of host chemotactic responses that may serve to evade immune clearance. It will be important in the future to further characterize this phenomenon in vitro and in vivo in the context of immune cell recruitment and inflammation. Overall, using a physiologically relevant 3-D cervical cell model and a reductionist approach, we are beginning to illuminate how specific BVAB stimulate inflammatory and chemotactic host responses to generate a tumor-promoting cervicovaginal microenvironment.

Regarding apoptosis-related proteins, we previously reported that FasL was elevated in cervicovaginal lavages of women with vaginal dysbiosis and cervical cancer9. By upregulating sFasL in the cervical microenvironment, L. parvula may mediate immune suppression and antitumoral escape mechanisms58. F. gonidiaformans significantly, yet modestly, upregulated secretion of TRAIL, and cervical cancer cells can develop resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis59,60. Chronic, low-level secretion of TRAIL may select for TRAIL resistance in neoplastic cervical lesions. L. parvula and F. gonidiaformans may therefore influence local immune suppression and selection for neoplastic subpopulations.

The first described oncometabolite was 2-hydroxyglutarate, which is an aberrant byproduct of mutant human isocitrate dehydrogenase25. Bacteria can also generate 2-hydroxyglutarate through lysine degradative pathways39 and glutamate fermentation61. Additionally, 2-hydroxyglutarate is elevated in women with BV62, vaginal dysbiosis63 and in women who practice douching64, the latter of which is associated with an increased risk of developing BV65. BVAB, such as Fusobacterium spp., may therefore promote a neoplastic cervicovaginal microenvironment by upregulating 2-hydroxyglutarate and other oncogenic metabolites.

The important metabolites predictive of infections with tested BVAB also suggested a strong metabolic contribution to histidine degradation (Fig. 4a). The metabolite trans-urocanate is a marker of filaggrin degradation, a histidine-rich protein and a keratinocyte-specific marker66. Genetic defects in filaggrin predispose women to HPV infection and increased cervical cancer mortality67,68. Specific BVAB may compromise the cervical epithelial barrier by promoting filaggrin catabolism, thus improving access to the underlying basal cells of the cervical transition zone to drive HPV infection and, subsequently, cervical carcinogenesis. The mechanisms describing how specific BVAB may compromise the cervical epithelial barrier function in vivo are limited and require further investigations.

All BVAB tested modulated metabolomic profiles that were enriched in the methionine and cysteine metabolic pathway (Fig. 7). Cysteine is an important metabolite that also intersects with glutathione metabolism. Glutathione participates in the detoxification of genotoxic reactive oxygen species69 and may become limited during prolonged oxidative stress70. Cleavage of l-cystathionine replenishes l-cysteine and generates 2-hydroxybutyrate, the latter of which is a metabolic marker of oxidative stress71. Infection with both Fusobacterium species induced significant accumulation of 2-hydroxybutyrate and depletion of glutathione intermediates. These metabolic signatures of oxidative stress have been reported in clinical samples collected from women with BV62. Our previous clinical study investigating cervicovaginal metabolomes in women with and without cervical neoplasia also showed that cervicovaginal levels of 2-hydroxybutyrate were positively correlated with genital inflammation, Lactobacillus depletion, and cervical cancer72. Though we did not detect reduced or oxidized glutathione in this study, the differential abundance of other metabolites participating in glutathione metabolism suggests that Fusobacterium spp. induces oxidative stress in human 3-D cervical cells. Additional work is needed to confirm whether this phenomenon is mirrored in the clinical setting.

We found signatures of hydrogen sulfide production by Fusobacterium spp. (Fig. 7), which is in accordance with previous studies61,73. Lanthionine was highly accumulated during infection with both Fusobacterium spp. This nonproteinogenic amino acid is a component of the Fusobacterium peptidoglycan structure61,74. Lanthionine biosynthesis generates hydrogen sulfide, which has been associated in a mouse model with advanced-stage ovarian cancer75 and may be genotoxic34. Lanthionine biosynthesis may therefore contribute to the tumor-promoting properties of Fusobacterium spp. in the cervicovaginal microenvironment13,76.

F. gonidiaformans and F. nucleatum similarly modulated lipid metabolism (Fig. 8). Our data suggest that F. nucleatum and F. gonidiaformans may exploit host-derived ethanolamine to sustain carbon and nitrogen demands in the cervicovaginal microenvironment61. We also found evidence of extracellular sphingolipid accumulation during infection with F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, and L. parvula. In clinical settings, both sphingomyelins and Fusobacterium were found to be elevated in fecal samples collected from colorectal cancer patients relative to healthy controls77. Fusobacterium spp. and L. parvula may therefore modulate a tumor-promoting microenvironment by inducing sphingolipid accumulation in the lower FRT.

In this study, we have provided novel insights into the putative immunometabolic mechanisms employed by understudied BVAB associated with cancer using a well-characterized 3-D human cervical cell model. It is important to study the tumor-promoting mechanisms of these BVAB, despite their low relative abundance in the cervicovaginal microbiome, as such species may still modulate the FRT microenvironment in a manner that provides pro-carcinogenic “second hits” that synergize with other factors to promote the cancerous phenotype. Given that cervical carcinogenesis is largely mediated by HPV, it may be possible that specific BVAB alter the immunometabolic landscape to promote HPV infection and persistence, therefore increasing the likelihood of cervical neoplastic events. Additional studies are needed to determine whether these and other BVAB modulate the immunometabolic landscape in a similar fashion to promote other gynecologic malignancies, such as endometrial cancer78.

Limitations of our current study include the lack of modeling of bacterial diversity associated with BV; however, here, we aimed to dissect the individual contributions of specific understudied BVAB to avoid confounding results associated with inter-bacterial interactions. In the context of metabolism, it is likely that some metabolites are generated by one or more bacterial species and utilized by others79,80. This may be reflected in the low metabolic activity seen with L. parvula and, to a lesser extent, P. lacrimalis and P. uenonis infections. Such co-interactions may profoundly influence the local metabolic microenvironment and will be the focus of future studies. Additionally, bacterial co-interactions may synergistically modulate the host-pathogen immune response20. We cannot exclude the possibility of inter-strain differences corresponding to the species studied here in the context of differential metabolomic and inflammatory responses. Previously, we have determined the immunometabolic impact of health-associated lactobacilli and more common BVAB associated with cervical cancer, such as F. vaginae and S. amnii, using similar experimental approaches22. Though this report lacks a commensal species, such as lactobacilli, the inclusion of PBS mock-infected controls provided in this report allows us to derive immunoproteomic and metabolomic conclusions against healthy (i.e., non-infected) 3-D cervical cells. The strains utilized in this paper are usually present at relatively low levels in women with BV and gynecologic cancers; therefore, it remains unknown whether these species directly influence pro-tumorigenic mechanisms or if their presence in the context of cancer is due to a favorable microenvironment (e.g., nutrient availability due to ulceration and bleeding). Clinical longitudinal studies are required to determine the colonization kinetics of BVAB associated with gynecologic malignancies and whether such species conform to the “driver-passenger” model81. In this manner, it is important to differentiate whether other understudied BVAB associated with gynecologic cancer directly promote malignancy (“driver”) or if the cancerous microenvironment (e.g., ulceration and bleeding) favors colonization with these species (“passenger”). The data provided in this report provides the foundations for future studies that incorporate infection with polymicrobial “cocktails” to explore how bacterial co-interactions influence the host defense responses of 3-D cervical cells.

In summary, we identified putative mechanisms by which BVAB associated with various cancers, including gynecologic malignancies, may create a tumor-promoting immunometabolic microenvironment (Fig. 9). Of the BVAB tested, L. parvula, P. lacrimalis, and P. uenonis influenced the immune host response to the greatest extent while F. gonidiaformans and F. nucleatum elicited the greatest metabolic activity and modulated metabolic hallmarks of cancer. Additionally, all BVAB tested except L. parvula elicited metabolic signatures of histidine catabolism that may be correlated with disruption of the cervical epithelium. In conclusion, this data suggests that particular BVAB may promote HPV infection and persistence and consequently cervical neoplasia by generating pro-inflammatory responses and upregulating metabolic hallmarks of cancer. Our study provides a foundation for further defining the role of understudied BVAB species in promoting a cervicovaginal immunometabolic microenvironment permissive for carcinogenesis.

Fig. 9. Summary of hallmarks of cancer influenced by BVAB associated with cancer.

Fig. 9

Heatmap depicts the relative impact that each bacterial species contributes to the putative pro-tumorigenic microenvironment based on our 3-D cervical cell model. Heatmap colors were assigned based on standardized levels of significantly (p < 0.05) modulated immunoproteomic and metabolomic biomarkers related to the hallmarks of cancer such as inflammation, avoiding immune destruction, barrier disruption, and genomic instability.

Methods

Human endocervical epithelial cell culture

Human endocervical epithelial A2 cells82 were routinely maintained in keratinocyte serum-free medium (KFSM) supplemented with recombinant epidermal growth factor (5 ng/ml), bovine pituitary extract (50 µg/ml; Gibco), CaCl2 (22 mg/ml; Sigma), and primocin (100 µg/ml, InvivoGen), herein referred to as A2 medium. Cervical cells were cultured as monolayers or as three-dimensional (3-D) models, as previously described17,83, at 37 °C under 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Atopobium parvulum (recently reclassified as L. parvula) strain DNF00906, Fusobacterium gonidiaformans strain CMW8396, F. nucleatum strain MJR7757B, P. lacrimalis strain DNF00528, and Porphyromonas uenonis strain UPII 60-3 were used in this study. All strains were obtained from the Biodefense and Emerging Infections (BEI) repository. L. parvula and P. lacrimalis were cultured on tryptic soy agar (Becton Dickinson) supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood (Quad Five). F. gonidiaformans, F. nucleatum, and P. uenonis were cultured on brain-heart infusion agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood. All strains were routinely maintained at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions generated by an AnaeroPack system (Thermo Scientific).

Bacterial infection of cervical cell monolayers

Cervical cell monolayers were seeded into tissue-treated 24-well plates to a density of ~2 × 105 cells per well and incubated overnight in an antibiotic-free A2 medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2 atmosphere. Bacterial strains were sub-cultured onto fresh agar medium at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions 24-h prior to infection. Bacterial strains were harvested and resuspended into sterile Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The bacterial species tested formed residual bacterial aggregates during processing and proved difficult to generate a homogenous cell suspension in PBS. We, therefore, adjusted all species to a standard optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.05, 0.5, and 5.0 and cervical cells were infected with adjusted bacterial suspensions (20 μl per 1 × 105 cells). PBS-treated mock infections served as controls. Infected cervical cells were incubated under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 24-h prior to use for downstream experimental manipulation. All experiments were performed as three independent biological replicates.

Bacterial infection of 3-D cervical cell models

The 3-D cervical cell models were differentiated for 28 days in rotating-wall vessel (RWV) bioreactors, as previously described17,83. The 3-D cervical cell models were then harvested, washed in pre-warmed antibiotic-free A2 medium, and distributed into tissue-treated 24-well culture plates (1 × 105–5 × 105 cells/ml). Bacteria were processed from agar medium and adjusted to an OD600 of 0.5 as described above and used to infect 3-D cervical cells (20 μl per 1 × 105 cells). Infected 3-D cells were incubated under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C. PBS-treated mock infections served as controls. Cell culture supernatants were harvested 24-h post-infection and immediately stored at −80 °C until further use. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) experiments, 3-D cervical cells were infected with bacterial suspension (OD600 of 5.0, 20 μl per 1 × 105 cells) for 4 h. Colonized 3-D cervical cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and visualized by SEM, as previously described17. All samples were processed and visualized at the Arizona State University Eyring Materials Center Life Sciences Electron Microscopy Lab using a JEOL JSM 6300 scanning electron microscope.

Cytotoxicity assays

Cervical epithelial cell monolayers were individually infected with bacteria, as described above. Cervical cell cytotoxicity was measured by trypan blue exclusion using a hemocytometer. All experiments were performed as three independent biological replicates.

Bio-Plex analyses

Immunoproteomic profiles were determined in cell culture supernatants collected from 3-D cervical cell models infected with bacterial strains and PBS mock-infected controls. Cytokines (interleukin-1α (IL-1α), IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-6, transforming growth factor-alpha (TGFα), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα)), chemokines (IL-8, IP-10, macrophage chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), MCP3, MIP-1β, fractalkine, and RANTES), and growth factors (platelet-derived growth factor-AA (PDGF-AA) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)) were measured using the MILLIPLEX® MAP Human Cytokine/Chemokine Panel 1, Th17 Panel, and Sepsis Panel 2. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-1, MMP-7, MMP-9, and MMP-10) were measured using the MILLIPLEX® MAP MMP Panel 2. Circulating cancer biomarkers (macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), TRAIL, sFasL, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125)) were quantified using MILLIPLEX® MAP Circulating Cancer Biomarker Panel 1. (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Data were collected using a Bio-Plex 200 platform and analyzed using Manager v5.0 software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). A five-parameter logistic regression curve fit was used to determine the concentration. At least three independent biological replicates per experimental condition, each containing two technical replicates, were analyzed.

Global untargeted metabolomics

Frozen supernatants collected from 3-D cervical cell infections and PBS mock-infected controls were sent to Metabolon Inc. (Durhan, NC) for ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) untargeted metabolomics, as previously described72. Metabolites were resolved on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC unit and detected using a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The MS analysis alternated between MS and data-dependent MSn scans using dynamic exclusion. The scan range varied slighted between methods but covered 70–1000 m/z. Raw mass spectrum data was extracted, peak-identified and QC processed using Metabolon’s Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). Compounds were identified by comparison to library entries of purified standards or recurrent unknown entities. At least three independent biological replicates per experimental condition were submitted for metabolomics analyses.

Bioinformatic and statistical analyses

Random Forest classification, Spearman’s correlation analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and metabolite pathway enrichment were performed using MetaboAnalyst 4.084. Hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) was performed using the online ClustVis software by Euclidean distance measures and average linkage clustering. Median-centered metabolite peak intensity values were ln(x) transformed and subject to autoscale normalization prior to HCA analysis.

Statistics and reproducibility

We used two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-tests to compare cytotoxicity and Bio-Plex data between infections and untreated mock infections (PBS controls). Metabolite peak intensity values were median-centered and missing values were imputed with half the minimum value across all samples for a given metabolite. Univariate statistical analyses on normalized data (infection vs. PBS control) was performed by two-tailed paired Student’s t-tests using the rstatix R package. To correct for multiple comparisons, false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted p values (q values) were calculated using the q value R package. All experiments and statistical analyses, except for SEM, were performed as independent studies with at least three biological replicates. Technical replicates were defined as sample measurements taken from within a single biological replicate.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

42003_2022_3681_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (545.5KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1 (72.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 2 (176.7KB, xlsx)
Reporting Summary (1.2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank David Lowry at Arizona State University Life Science Electron Microscopy Lab Core for assistance in SEM sample preparation and imaging and Ross McKenzie for technical assistance with bacterial cultivation. Also, we would like to acknowledge the Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (https://www.beiresources.org), NIAID, NIH as a part of the Human Microbiome Project for supplying bacterial isolates for this study; L. parvula strain DNF00906, F. gonidiaformans strain CMW8396, F. nucleatum strain MJR7757B, P. lacrimalis strain UPII 315-B, and P. uenonis strain UPII 60-3. Funding for this project was provided by NIH National Cancer Institute and a supplement from the Office of Research for Women’s Health #3P30CA023074-39S3 (M.M.H.-K.) and the Flinn Foundation Grant #2244 (M.M.H.-K.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author contributions

M.M.H.-K. and P.L. conceived the studies and designed the experiments. J.D.M. implemented the study design and drafted the initial manuscript version. J.D.M, M.M.H.-K., and P.L. analyzed and interpreted the results. M.M.H.-K. and P.L. contributed to manuscript edits and revisions. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript version.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Sridhar Mani, Anam Akhtar and Christina Karlsson Rosenthal.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Files. Source data for all graphs and heatmaps are available in the Supplemental Files.

Code availability

R scripts used for statistical analysis of metabolomics data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42003-022-03681-6.

References

  • 1.Polk DB, Peek RM. Helicobacter Pylori: gastric cancer and beyond (vol 10, pg 403, 2010) Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2010;10:593–593. doi: 10.1038/nrc2903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brennan CA, Garrett WS. Fusobacterium nucleatum - symbiont, opportunist and oncobacterium. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17:156–166. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0129-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mao S, et al. Intrinsic apoptotic pathways of gingival epithelial cells modulated by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Cell. Microbiol. 2007;9:1997–2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00931.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kuboniwa M, et al. P. gingivalis accelerates gingival epithelial cell progression through the cell cycle. Microbes Infect. 2008;10:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Helmink BA, Khan MAW, Hermann A, Gopalakrishnan V, Wargo JA. The microbiome, cancer, and cancer therapy. Nat. Med. 2019;25:377–388. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0377-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Łaniewski P, Ilhan ZE, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. The microbiome and gynaecological cancer development, prevention and therapy. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2020;17:232–250. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0286-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Muzny CA, Łaniewski P, Schwebke JR, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Host-vaginal microbiota interactions in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2020;33:59–65. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Łaniewski P, et al. Linking cervicovaginal immune signatures, HPV and microbiota composition in cervical carcinogenesis in non-Hispanic and Hispanic women. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:7593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25879-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Łaniewski P, et al. Features of the cervicovaginal microenvironment drive cancer biomarker signatures in patients across cervical carcinogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:7333. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43849-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brusselaers N, Shrestha S, van de Wijgert J, Verstraelen H. Vaginal dysbiosis and the risk of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;221:9–18.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Norenhag J, et al. The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus and cervical dysplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJOG. 2020;127:171–180. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mitra, A. et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia disease progression is associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity. Sci. Rep.5, 16865 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Audirac-Chalifour, A. et al. Cervical microbiome and cytokine profile at various stages of cervical cancer: a pilot study. PLos ONE11, e0153274 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Lee, J. E. et al. Association of the vaginal microbiota with human papillomavirus infection in a Korean Twin Cohort. PLos ONE8, e63514 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Chase D, Goulder A, Zenhausern F, Monk B, Herbst-Kralovetz M. The vaginal and gastrointestinal microbiomes in gynecologic cancers: a review of applications in etiology, symptoms and treatment. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015;138:190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Walther-Antonio, M. R. S. et al. Potential contribution of the uterine microbiome in the development of endometrial cancer. Genome Med.8, 122 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Radtke, A. L., Quayle, A. J. & Herbst-Kralovetz, M. M. Microbial products alter the expression of membrane-associated mucin and antimicrobial peptides in a three-dimensional human endocervical epithelial cell model. Biol. Reprod.87, 132 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Radtke, A. L. & Herbst-Kralovetz, M. M. Culturing and applications of rotating wall vessel bioreactor derived 3D epithelial cell models. J. Vis. Exp. 3868 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.McGowin CL, Radtke AL, Abraham K, Martin DH, Herbst-Kralovetz M. Mycoplasma genitalium infection activates cellular host defense and inflammation pathways in a 3-dimensional human endocervical epithelial cell model. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;207:1857–1868. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gardner JK, et al. Interleukin-36gamma is elevated in cervicovaginal epithelial cells in women with bacterial vaginosis and in vitro after infection with microbes associated with bacterial vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;221:983–988. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Winkle SM, Throop AL, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. IL-36γ augments host defense and immune responses in human female reproductive tract epithelial cells. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:955. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Łaniewski P, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Bacterial vaginosis and health-associated bacteria modulate the immunometabolic landscape in 3D model of human cervix. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021;7:88. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00259-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Salliss ME, Maarsingh JD, Garza C, Łaniewski P, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Veillonellaceae family members uniquely alter the cervical metabolic microenvironment in a human three-dimensional epithelial model. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021;7:57. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00229-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yachida S, et al. Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses reveal distinct stage-specific phenotypes of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 2019;25:968. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0458-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dang L, et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature. 2009;462:739–U752. doi: 10.1038/nature08617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mildner M, et al. Knockdown of filaggrin impairs diffusion barrier function and increases UV sensitivity in a human skin model. J. Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:2286–2294. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hug DH, Roth D, Hunter J. Regulation of histidine catabolism by succinate in Pseudomonas putida. J. Bacteriol. 1968;96:396. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.2.396-402.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen Y, et al. Assessment of data pre-processing methods for LC-MS/MS-based metabolomics of uterine cervix cancer. Analyst. 2013;138:2669–2677. doi: 10.1039/c3an36818a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shao X, et al. Screening and verifying endometrial carcinoma diagnostic biomarkers based on a urine metabolomic profiling study using UPLC-Q-TOF/MS. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2016;463:200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gharbia SE, Shah HN. Pathways of glutamate catabolism among Fusobacterium species. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1991;137:1201–1206. doi: 10.1099/00221287-137-5-1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li N, et al. Three new species of the genus Peptostreptococcus isolated from humans: Peptostreptococcus vaginalis sp-nov, Peptostreptococcus lacrimalis sp-nov, and Peptostreptococcus lactolyticus sp-nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1992;42:602–605. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-4-602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Luo, X. et al. Emerging roles of lipid metabolism in cancer metastasis. Mol. Cancer16, 76 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Ogretmen B. Sphingolipid metabolism in cancer signalling and therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:33–50. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Attene-Ramos MS, Wagner ED, Plewa MJ, Gaskins HR. Evidence that hydrogen sulfide is a genotoxic agent. Mol. Cancer Res. 2006;4:9–14. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-05-0126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Casasanta, M. A. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum host-cell binding and invasion induces IL-8 and CXCL1 secretion that drives colorectal cancer cell migration. Sci. Signal.13, eaba9157 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Olsen I, Taubman MA, Singhrao SK. Porphyromonas gingivalis suppresses adaptive immunity in periodontitis, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Oral. Microbiol. 2016;8:33029. doi: 10.3402/jom.v8.33029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Knorr, S. et al. Widespread bacterial lysine degradation proceeding via glutarate and L-2-hydroxyglutarate. Nat. Commun.9, 5071 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Peters, B.A. et al. The gut microbiota in conventional and serrated precursors of colorectal cancer. Microbiome4, 69 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.Citron DM. Update on the taxonomy and clinical aspects of the genus Fusobacterium. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002;35:S22–S27. doi: 10.1086/341916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Anahtar MN, et al. Cervicovaginal bacteria are a major modulator of host inflammatory responses in the female genital tract. Immunity. 2015;42:965–976. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Oh HY, et al. The association of uterine cervical microbiota with an increased risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Korea. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015;21:674.e671–679. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Swidsinski A, et al. Adherent biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005;106:1013–1023. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183594.45524.d2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Multhoff G, Molls M, Radons J. Chronic inflammation in cancer development. Front. Immunol. 2011;2:98. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lennard, K. et al. Microbial composition predicts genital tract inflammation and persistent bacterial vaginosis in South African adolescent females. Infect Immun.86, e00410-17 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Mitchell C, Marrazzo J. Bacterial vaginosis and the cervicovaginal immune response. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014;71:555–563. doi: 10.1111/aji.12264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Boccardo E, Lepique AP, Villa LL. The role of inflammation in HPV carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:1905–1912. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Beigi RH, Yudin MH, Cosentino L, Meyn LA, Hillier SL. Cytokines, pregnancy, and bacterial vaginosis: Comparison of levels of cervical cytokines in pregnant and nonpregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2007;196:1355–1360. doi: 10.1086/521628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hedges SR, Barrientes F, Desmond RA, Schwebke JR. Local and systemic cytokine levels in relation to changes in vaginal flora. J. Infect. Dis. 2006;193:556–562. doi: 10.1086/499824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wei LH, et al. Interleukin-6 promotes cervical tumor growth by VEGF-dependent angiogenesis via a STAT3 pathway. Oncogene. 2003;22:1517–1527. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wei LH, et al. Interleukin-6 in cervical cancer: the relationship with vascular endothelial growth factor. Gynecologic Oncol. 2001;82:49–56. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wei LH, et al. The anti-apoptotic role of interleukin-6 in human cervical cancer is mediated by up-regulation of Mcl-1 through a PI3-K/Akt pathway. Oncogene. 2001;20:5799–5809. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pahne-Zeppenfeld J, et al. Cervical cancer cell-derived interleukin-6 impairs CCR7-dependent migration of MMP-9-expressing dendritic cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2014;134:2061–2073. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jia LL, et al. IL-8 is upregulated in cervical cancer tissues and is associated with the proliferation and migration of HeLa cervical cancer cells. Oncol. Lett. 2018;15:1350–1356. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fujimoto J, Sakaguchi H, Aoki I, Tamaya T. Clinical implications of expression of interleukin 8 related to angiogenesis in uterine cervical cancers. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2632–2635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cauci S, et al. Interrelationships of interleukin-8 with interleukin-1 beta and neutrophils in vaginal fluid of healthy and bacterial vaginosis positive women. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2003;9:53–58. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gag003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mohme M, Riethdorf S, Pantel K. Circulating and disseminated tumour cells - mechanisms of immune surveillance and escape. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017;14:155–167. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Plissonnier ML, et al. Cell death and restoration of TRAIL-sensitivity by ciglitazone in resistant cervical cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:107744–107762. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kwon HR, Lee KW, Dong ZG, Lee KB, Oh SM. Requirement of T-lymphokine-activated killer cell-originated protein kinase for TRAIL resistance of human HeLa cervical cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;391:830–834. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.11.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kapatral V, et al. Genome sequence and analysis of the oral bacterium Fusobacterium nucleatum strain ATCC 25586. J. Bacteriol. 2002;184:2005–2018. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.7.2005-2018.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Srinivasan, S. et al. Metabolic signatures of bacterial vaginosis. MBio6, e00204 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.McMillan, A. et al. A multi-platform metabolomics approach identifies highly specific biomarkers of bacterial diversity in the vagina of pregnant and non-pregnant women. Sci. Rep.5, 14174 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 64.Yeoman, C. J. et al. A multi-omic systems-based approach reveals metabolic markers of bacterial vaginosis and insight into the disease. PLos ONE8, e56111 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 65.Klebanoff MA, et al. Personal hygienic behaviors and bacterial vaginosis. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2010;37:94–99. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181bc063c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fleckman P, Dale BA, Holbrook KA. Profilaggrin, a high-molecular-weight precursor of filaggrin in human-epidermis and cultured keratinocytes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1985;85:507–512. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12277306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Skaaby, T. et al. Associations of filaggrin gene loss-of-function variants and human papillomavirus-related cancer and pre-cancer in Danish adults. PLos ONE9, e99437 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 68.Bager P, et al. Common filaggrin gene mutations and risk of cervical cancer. Acta Oncologica. 2015;54:217–223. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.973613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nzengue Y, Steiman R, Garrel C, Lefebvre E, Guiraud P. Oxidative stress and DNA damage induced by cadmium in the human keratinocyte HaCaT cell line: role of glutathione in the resistance to cadmium. Toxicology. 2008;243:193–206. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chen, M. et al. Metabolomics reveals that cysteine metabolism plays a role in celastrol-induced mitochondrial apoptosis in HL-60 and NB-4 Cells. Sci. Rep.10, 471 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 71.Nagao M, et al. beta-Hydroxybutyrate elevation as a compensatory response against oxidative stress in cardiomyocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;475:322–328. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.05.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ilhan ZE, et al. Deciphering the complex interplay between microbiota, HPV, inflammation and cancer through cervicovaginal metabolic profiling. EBioMedicine. 2019;44:675–690. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Basic, A., Blomqvist, M., Dahlen, G. & Svensater, G. The proteins of Fusobacterium spp. involved in hydrogen sulfide production from L-cysteine. BMC Microbiol.17, 61 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 74.Yoshida Y, et al. Production of hydrogen sulfide by two enzymes associated with biosynthesis of homocysteine and lanthionine in Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp nucleatum ATCC 25586. Microbiology. 2010;156:2260–2269. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.039180-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bhattacharyya, S. et al. Cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) contributes to advanced ovarian cancer progression and drug resistance. PLos ONE8, e79167 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 76.Huang S-I, et al. Intratumoral levels and prognostic significance of Fusobacterium nucleatum in cervical carcinoma. Aging. 2020;12:23337–23350. doi: 10.18632/aging.104188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sinha, R. et al. Fecal microbiota, fecal metabolome, and colorectal cancer interrelations. PLos ONE11, e0152126 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 78.Łaniewski, P., Gomez, A., Hire, G., So, M. & Herbst-Kralovetz, M. M. Human three-dimensional endometrial epithelial cell model to study host interactions with vaginal bacteria and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Infect. Immun. 85, e01049-16 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 79.Pybus V, Onderdonk AB. Evidence for a commensal, symbiotic relationship between Gardnerella vaginalis and Prevotella bivia involving ammonia: potential significance for bacterial vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 1997;175:406–413. doi: 10.1093/infdis/175.2.406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Agarwal K, et al. Glycan cross-feeding supports mutualism between Fusobacterium and the vaginal microbiota. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:e3000788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tjalsma H, Boleij A, Marchesi JR, Dutilh BE. A bacterial driver-passenger model for colorectal cancer: beyond the usual suspects. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;10:575–582. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Herbst-Kralovetz MM, et al. Quantification and comparison of toll-like receptor expression and responsiveness in primary and immortalized human female lower genital tract epithelia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2008;59:212–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2007.00566.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Jackson R, Maarsingh JD, Herbst-Kralovetz MM, Van Doorslaer K. 3D oral and cervical tissue models for studying papillomavirus host-pathogen interactions. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2020;59:e129. doi: 10.1002/cpmc.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chong J, Wishart DS, Xia J. Using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for comprehensive and integrative metabolomics data analysis. Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma. 2019;68:e86. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

42003_2022_3681_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (545.5KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1 (72.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 2 (176.7KB, xlsx)
Reporting Summary (1.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Files. Source data for all graphs and heatmaps are available in the Supplemental Files.

R scripts used for statistical analysis of metabolomics data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Communications Biology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES