Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 23;22:326. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02770-y

Table 2.

Procedure details

LAA types
 Chicken wing 7 (23.3)
 Windsock 2 (6.7)
 Cactus 1 (3.3)
 Cauliflower 20 (66.7)
LAA lobes
 1 8 (26.7)
 2 20 (66.7)
 ≥3 2 (6.7)
Umbrella position in the LAA
 Branch 9 (30)
 Common trunk of branches 13 (43.3)
 Main lobe (one-lobe LAA) 8 (26.7)
Parameters of the LAA
 Diameter of LAA orifice, mm 27.4 ± 3.95
 Diameter of LAA landing zone, mm 19.0 ± 4.39
 Orifice/Landing zone ratio 1.6 ± 0.31
 Difference between orifice and landing zone, mm 9.2 ± 4.19
Parameters of the LAmbre device
 Diameter of outer cover, mm 34.4 ± 2.75
 Diameter of inner umbrella, mm 22.0 ± 3.42
 Cover/Umbrella ratio 1.6 ± 0.14
 Difference between cover and umbrella, mm 12.5 ± 0.86
Device selection and deployment
 Success at first device selected 21 (70.0)
 Success at second device selected 6 (20.0)
 Success at third device selected 3 (10.0)
 Success at first deployment 14 (46.7)
 Number of retrieve and re-deployment 1.4 ± 1.6
 TEE guidance 18 (60.0)
 ICE guidance 12 (40.0)
Peri-device leak
 No residual flow 26 (86.7)
 Residual flow < 1 mm 4 (13.3)
 Residual flow 1–3 mm 0
 Residual flow > 3 mm 0

ICE intracardiac echocardiography, LAA left arial appendage, TEE transesophageal echocardiography. The TEE and ICE results presented are site reports and not core lab evaluations