Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 16;2022:7804015. doi: 10.1155/2022/7804015

Table 3.

Comparison as a whole.

Experimental group Control group T/Z P
Aortic root (HU) 523 ± 82 634 ± 87 −11.65 0.001
SD noise (HU) 28 ± 4 32 ± 5 −6.17a 0.001
Contrast tissue (HU) 123 ± 12 125 ± 15 −1.50 0.136
SNR 18.7 ± 3.5 20.3 ± 4.0 −3.22 0.001
CNR 14.3 ± 3.3 16.3 ± 3.7 −4.43 0.001
Proximal RCA (HU) 473 ± 90 642 ± 101 −16.53 0.001
Mid RCA (HU) 440 ± 98 612 ± 103 −15.09 0.001
Distal RCA (HU) 390 ± 94 581 ± 117 −15.33 0.001
Proximal LAD (HU) 491 ± 84 598 ± 93 −10.25 0.001
Mid LAD (HU) 440 ± 86 556 ± 93 −10.79 0.001
Distal LAD (HU) 363 ± 75 482 ± 94 −8.58a 0.001
Proximal LCX (HU) 478 ± 83 585 ± 96 −7.86a 0.001
Distal LCX (HU) 372 ± 80 485 ± 94 −11.07 0.001

a: Calculated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.