Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 23;19:91. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01323-y

Table 2.

Temperament and weight status by eating behavior profile

Total Sample High Food Avoidant High Food Approach Moderate
Eating
P
Profile 1 Profile 2 Profile 3
N = 1004 n = 357 (35.6%) n = 213 (21.2%) n = 434 (43.2%)
Temperament
CBQ Anger/Frustration, M (SD) 4.74 (1.21) 4.79 (1.24)a 4.92 (1.26)a 4.61 (1.15)b .01
CBQ Impulsivity, M (SD) 4.76 (.88) 4.62 (.88)a 4.84 (.93)b 4.83 (.84)b .001
CBQ Inhibitory Control, M (SD) 4.55 (1.02) 4.49 (.98)a 4.29 (1.09)b 4.74 (.98)c  < .0001
Weight
BMI z-score, M (SD) .67 (1.13) .38 (1.14)a .90 (1.20)b .80 (1.03)b  < .0001
Weight status, n (%)  < .0001*
With Obesity 169 (17.1) 36 (1.3) 48 (23.2) 85 (19.7)
With Overweight 185 (18.7) 56 (16.0)a 41 (19.8)b 88 (2.4)a,b
With Underweight/Normal weight 636 (64.2) 259 (73.8)a 118 (57.0)b 259 (6.0)b

Children’s Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ)

Differing superscript letters indicate differences between eating behavior profiles (P < .05); superscript letters that are the same indicate no difference between eating behavior profiles

*Predicting profile membership from 3-category weight status, using multinomial regression and “with obesity” as the referent

Underweight (2.2%) and normal weight (62.0%) were combined for analysis given the small cell size of underweight