Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 2;13(8):1531–1546. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01285-1

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression of the association between AGEs and microangiopathy

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value
Retinopathy (n = 66)
 SAF (AU) 2.12 (1.30, 3.47) 0.002 1.92 (1.16, 3.18) 0.011
 CML (100 µmol/mol lysine)a 0.99 (0.95, 1.03) 0.66 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) 0.39
 Pentosidine (µmol/mol lysine) 0.97 (0.77, 1.21) 0.80 0.97 (0.77, 1.23) 0.33
 MGH1 (mmol/mol lysine) 0.81 (0.52, 1.24) 0.34 0.75 (0.48, 1.17) 0.22
Nephropathy (n = 36)
 SAF (AU) 1.96 (1.13, 3.39) 0.016 1.63 (0.89, 2.97) 0.10
 CML (100 µmol/mol lysine)a 1.03 (0.99, 1.07) 0.158 1.003 (0.999, 1.008) 0.18
 Pentosidine (mmol/mol lysine) 1.09 (0.84, 1.41) 0.50 1.14 (0.86, 1.51) 0.34
 MGH1 (µmol/mol lysine) 1.51 (0.94, 2.43) 0.08 1.72 (1.02, 2.87) 0.03
Neuropathy (n = 39)
 SAF 3.63 (1.99, 6.62)  < 0.0001 2.02 (1.00, 4.07) 0.04
 CML (100 µmol/mol lysine)a 0.99 (0.95, 1,04) 0.86 0.99 (0.94, 1.04) 0.82
 Pentosidine (µmol/mol lysine) 1.16 (0.90, 1.48) 0.24 1.17 (0.90, 1.51) 0.24
 MGH1 (mmol/mol lysine) 1.00 (0.61, 1.64) 0.98 0.92 (0.54, 1.56) 0.77
Composite criteria of microangiopathy (n = 93)
 SAF 3.26 (1.90, 5.60)  < 0.0001 2.83 (1.63, 4.93)  < 0.0001
 CML (100 µmol/mol lysine)a 0.98 (0.94, 1.01) 0.25 0.97 (0.93, 1.01) 0.11
 Pentosidine (µmol/mol lysine) 0.88 (0.71, 1.09) 0.25 0.90 (0.72, 1.23) 0.36
 MGH1 (mmol/mol lysine) 0.73 (0.49, 1.10) 0.13 0.71 (0.47, 1.09) 0.11

In multivariate analysis, AGEs were adjusted to potential confounders (i.e., age, sex, duration of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, BMI, smoking status, and glomerular filtration rate by CKD-EPI)

SAF skin autofluorescence, CML carboxymethyllysine, MGH1 methylglyoxal-hydroimidazolone-1, AU arbitrary units

aIn the regression models, CML was divided by 100 to obtain a clinically meaningful OR. Therefore, the reported odds ratio corresponds to the increase or decrease of 100 µmol/mol lysine), as appropriate