Table 1.
Studies included in the systematic review according to how they were identified, when they were published, design, patient demographics, follow up and type of implant
| Authors | Year | Search | Design | Patients (n =) | Age | F/U (months) | Implant | Robotic-arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bhimani et al. [4] | 2020 | GS | Retrospective cohorts | 140 RATKA vs 127 mTKA | 65.4 vs 66.6 | 1.5 | Triathlon PS | Stryker Mako |
| Kayani et al. [18] | 2018 | PM/ML | Prospective cohorts | 30 RATKA vs 30 mTKA | 68.5 vs 69.9 | ? | Triathlon PS | Stryker Mako |
| Kayani et al. [19] | 2018 | PM/ML | Prospective cohorts | 40 RATKA vs 40 mTKA | 69.7 vs 71.4 | 1 | Triathlon PS (cemented) | Stryker Mako |
| Kayani et al. [20] | 2019 | GS | Prospective cohorts | 60 RATKA vs 60 mTKA | 68.7 vs 67.6 | 1 | Triathlon PS (cemented) | Stryker Mako |
| Klopas et al. [23] | 2020 | PM/ML | Prospective cohorts | 150 RATKA vs 102 mTKA | 68 vs 65 | 3 | Triathlon CR (cemented) | Stryker Mako |
| King et al. [25] | 2020 | PM/ML | Retrospective cohort | 202 RATKA vs 290 mTKA | 68 vs 66 | RATKA = 15 vs mTKA = 36 | (Reported as same cemented implants only) | Stryker Mako |
| Mahoney et al. [28] | 2020 | PM/ML | Prospective cohorts | 143 RATKA vs 86 mTKA | 64.6 vs 68.5 | 12 | Triathlon CR (cemented) | Stryker Mako |
| Marchand et al. [30] | 2017 | PM/ML | Prospective cohorts | 28 RATKA vs 20 mTKA | 69 vs 67 | 6 | Triathlon CR (cemented) | Stryker Mako |
| Marchand et al. [31] | 2019 | PM/ML | Prospective cohorts | 53 RATKA vs 53 mTKA | 65 vs 63 | 12 | Triathlon CR (cemented) | Stryker Mako |
| Marchand et al. [32] | 2020 | GS | Retrospective cohorts | 20 RATKA (1 month) vs 60 RATKA (6 months) vs 60 RATKA (1 years) vs 60 mTKA | 64 vs 64 vs 65 vs 63 | ? | Triathlon CR (majority cementless, those done in first month were cemented) | Stryker Mako |
| Naziri et al. [36] | 2019 | PM/ML | Retrospective cohorts | 40 RATKA vs 40 mTKA | 69.5 vs 70.9 | 3 | Triathlon CR (cemented) | Stryker Mako |
| Savov et al. [44] | 2019 | GS | Prospective cohorts | 30 RATKA vs 30 mTKA | ? | ? | ? | Stryker Mako |
| Smith et al. [49] | 2019 | GS | Prospective cohorts | 120 RATKA vs 103 mTKA | 68 vs 66 | 12 | Triathlon PS (majority cementless, 10 in RATKA and 14 in mTKA cemented due to osteoporosis) | Stryker Mako |
| Sodhi et al. [50] | 2017 | GS | Retrospective cohorts | 40 RATKA (early) vs 40 RATKA (late) vs 40 mTKA | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Stryker Mako |
| Sultan et al. [51] | 2019 | PM/ML | Prospective cohorts | 43 RATKA vs 39 mTKA | 67 vs 66 | 1 – 1.5 | Triathlon CR (cemented) | Stryker Mako |
| Tucking et al. [52] | 2019 | GS | Prospective cohorts | 40 RATKA vs 40 mTKA | ? | ? | ? | Stryker Mako |
GS Google Scholar, ML Medline, PM PubMed, mTKA manual Total Knee Arthroplasty, RATKA Robotic-arm assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty, ? not stated, FU follow up, N/A not applicable