Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;13:863855. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.863855

TABLE 3.

Overview of similar studies.

Study Cohort, number of participants, age (SD) Peak aerobic SBP (SD), mmHg Maximal workload (SD), Watt Difference from baseline, mmHg Exercise method BP measurement method Test protocol
Present study Well-trained male cyclists, 18, 32 (9.4) 231 (18) 403 (61) 95* Cycle ergometry Automated electronic exercise cuff Threshold W followed by 30 W increases every 1 min
Bauer et al. (2020) Male professional handball and hockey athletes, 142, 26 (5) 197 (20) 351 (79) 74 (20) Cycle ergometry Automated electronic exercise cuff 100 W followed by 50 W increases every 2 min until exhaustion
Pressler et al. (2018) Professional athletes, 2419 (663 female), 26 (12) 204 (22) 305 (59) 80 (20 Cycle ergometry Manual sphygmo-manometry Varying; usually starting load of 50-100 W with 20-50 W increases and 3-minute durations
Caselli et al. (2019) Male and female professional athletes, 141, 26 (6) 208 (22) 262 (61) 87* Cycle ergometry Manual sphygmo-manometry 0.5W/Kg with increases of 0.5W/Kg every 2 min
Karjalainen et al. (1997) Male orienteer and long distance runners, 32, 26 (3) 228 (16) 333 (27) 97* Cycle ergometry Manual sphygmo-manometry 50 W followed by 50 W increase every 3 min

SBP, systolic blood pressure. SD, standard deviation. W, watt. *SD unknown