Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 22;29:101923. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101923

Table 3.

Cost-effectiveness model attributes, funding, and CHEERS criteria.

Author Year Full study or letter to the editor Comparators Health outcomes Choice of model Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Funding Source CHEERS Criteria Percentage
Carpenter CF, et al. 2019 Full RZV, ZVL, or no vaccine costs and QALYs Markov Yes No extramural funding 100.0%



Curran D, et al. 2019 Full RZV, revaccination with ZVL, or no further vaccination shingles cases averted, deaths, costs, life years, and QALYs Markov Yes GlaxoSmithKline 96.0%



Prosser LA, et al. 2019 Full RZV, ZVL, or no vaccine costs and QALYs Markov Yes Centers for Disease and Control 100.0%



Curran D, et al. 2018 Full RZV, ZVL, or no vaccine shingles cases averted, deaths, costs, life years, and QALYs Markov Yes GlaxoSmithKline 96.0%



Dooling KL, et al. 2018 Full RZV, ZVL, or no vaccine costs and QALYs Not stated Yes No extramural funding 41.7%



Le P and Rothberg MB 2018 Full RZV, ZVL, or no vaccine costs and QALYs Markov Yes No extramural funding 100.0%



Le P and Rothberg MB 2018 Letter RZV, ZVL, ZVL with RZV, or no vaccine costs and QALYs Markov Yes No extramural funding 100.0%

QALY = quality-adjusted life year, RZV = recombinant zoster vaccine, ZVL = zoster vaccine live.