Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 5;11(4):479–488. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.182

Table 1. Framework to Determine the Extent to Which RPHCOs Are Comprehensive or Selective in Their Approach .

Key Elements Continuum From Selective To Comprehensive PHC
(Selective PHC)
1
2 3 4 (Comprehensive PHC)
5
Focus on population health Individual care − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> Population health
Focus on individuals and curative care; medical interventions; disease-specific care Main focus on curative care, and behavioral and lifestyle interventions; some attention on population health and prevention (mainly screening and immunisation) Continuum of curative, rehabilitative, preventive and health promotion services in planning and priority setting; strong focus on the health of the whole population
Focus on equity of access and outcomes No focus on equity − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> Equity of access and outcomes
No focus on equity; focus on disease specific strategies without attention to equity of access or outcomes Interventions to facilitate equity of access; targeting specific population groups in need; Some evidence of collecting population data on social determinants of health Focus on equity and social determinants of health; attention to equity of outcomes in the whole population through action on the social determinants of health
Community participation and control No community participation − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> Community controlled
No community engagement or control in planning and decision-making Some degree of community engagement mainly in identifying needs; limited engagement of communities in decision-making and priority setting; limited transfer of power to communities Community controlled; community representation in organisational decision-making structure (eg, board membership)
Integration within the broader health system Working in silo − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> Integration within the broader health system
No collaboration with the broader health system in governance, health planning, resource allocation and program implementation Some degree of vertical collaboration with broader health system eg, data sharing; informal mechanisms for collaboration eg, regular meetings Structural/functional vertical integration with the broader health system; strong collaboration with local or regional health organisations, secondary and tertiary health system via formal mechanisms
Inter-sectoral collaboration No collaboration outside health sector − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> Strong inter-sectoral collaboration
No collaboration with non-health sectors eg, local government, housing, employment and education Some degree of collaboration with non-health sectors; informal relationships eg, occasional meetings on specific local projects Strong collaboration with non-health sectors: joint planning and priority setting; formal mechanisms for collaborative work eg, memorandum of understanding, board membership
Local responsiveness Central management and control − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> Flexible and local response
Central funding allocation and priorities; no pool of flexible funding Some degree of local funding flexibility and priority setting, with locally tailored programs High level of flexible funding for locally tailored programs; organisational authority in responding to local needs

Abbreviations: RPHCOs, regional primary healthcare organisations; PHC, primary healthcare.