Table 1. Framework to Determine the Extent to Which RPHCOs Are Comprehensive or Selective in Their Approach .
Key Elements | Continuum From Selective To Comprehensive PHC | ||||
(Selective PHC)
1 |
2 | 3 | 4 |
(Comprehensive PHC)
5 |
|
Focus on population health | Individual care | − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> | Population health | ||
Focus on individuals and curative care; medical interventions; disease-specific care | Main focus on curative care, and behavioral and lifestyle interventions; some attention on population health and prevention (mainly screening and immunisation) | Continuum of curative, rehabilitative, preventive and health promotion services in planning and priority setting; strong focus on the health of the whole population | |||
Focus on equity of access and outcomes | No focus on equity | − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> | Equity of access and outcomes | ||
No focus on equity; focus on disease specific strategies without attention to equity of access or outcomes | Interventions to facilitate equity of access; targeting specific population groups in need; Some evidence of collecting population data on social determinants of health | Focus on equity and social determinants of health; attention to equity of outcomes in the whole population through action on the social determinants of health | |||
Community participation and control | No community participation | − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> | Community controlled | ||
No community engagement or control in planning and decision-making | Some degree of community engagement mainly in identifying needs; limited engagement of communities in decision-making and priority setting; limited transfer of power to communities | Community controlled; community representation in organisational decision-making structure (eg, board membership) | |||
Integration within the broader health system | Working in silo | − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> | Integration within the broader health system | ||
No collaboration with the broader health system in governance, health planning, resource allocation and program implementation | Some degree of vertical collaboration with broader health system eg, data sharing; informal mechanisms for collaboration eg, regular meetings | Structural/functional vertical integration with the broader health system; strong collaboration with local or regional health organisations, secondary and tertiary health system via formal mechanisms | |||
Inter-sectoral collaboration | No collaboration outside health sector | − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> | Strong inter-sectoral collaboration | ||
No collaboration with non-health sectors eg, local government, housing, employment and education | Some degree of collaboration with non-health sectors; informal relationships eg, occasional meetings on specific local projects | Strong collaboration with non-health sectors: joint planning and priority setting; formal mechanisms for collaborative work eg, memorandum of understanding, board membership | |||
Local responsiveness | Central management and control | − − − − − − −− − − − −− − − − − − − − − − − − − − −> | Flexible and local response | ||
Central funding allocation and priorities; no pool of flexible funding | Some degree of local funding flexibility and priority setting, with locally tailored programs | High level of flexible funding for locally tailored programs; organisational authority in responding to local needs |
Abbreviations: RPHCOs, regional primary healthcare organisations; PHC, primary healthcare.