Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;13:925913. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.925913

TABLE 1.

HDR editing efficiencies in bovine embryos for PMEL and PRLR mutations with different editors.

Editor ssODN Target Mutation PAM Mutation No. of Blastocysts HDR + ve 100% HDR
gRNA 129F/Cas9 1288 PMEL: ΔCTT (p.Leu18del) No 64 55/64 (86%) a 6/64 (9%) a
TALEN TL17/TR217 1288 PMEL: ΔCTT (p.Leu18del) NA 66 68/69 (99%) b 33/69 (48%) b
gRNA 632/Cas9 1403 PRLR: T > A (p.C440*) Yes 49 22/49 (45%) a 3/49 (6%) a
gRNA 634/Cas9 1446 PRLR: ΔC (p.L462*) Yes 25 7/25 (28%) a 1/25 (4%) ab
gRNA 634/Cas9 1411 PRLR: ΔC, C > A (p.L462*, p.S465*) Yes 151 96/151 (64%) b 0/151 (0%) b
gRNA 631/Cas9 1344 PRLR: ΔC (p.L462*) Yes 7 4/7 (57%) ab 0/7 (0%) ab

abValues for PMEL, and PRLR, editing with different superscripts within a column differ p < 0.01.