Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 21;10(7):23259671221109608. doi: 10.1177/23259671221109608

Table 1.

Characteristics of Study Participants a

Anterior Knee Laxity Rotatory Knee Laxity
Without (n = 166) With (n = 26) Without (n = 172) With (n = 20)
Age, y 24.4 ± 11.4 23.3 ± 10.9 24.6 ± 11.6 21.5 ± 8.9
Sex, male/female, n 55/111 9/17 58/114 6/14
Body mass index, kg/m2 23.0 ± 3.5 23.0 ± 4.0 23.1 ± 3.5 22.6 ± 3.8
Tegner score 6.4 ± 1.6 6.5 ± 2.1 6.4 ± 1.7 6.5 ± 1.9
Time from injury to surgery, mo 5.5 ± 23.1 3.5 ± 4.7 5.5 ± 22.7 2.9 ± 2.9
KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, mm 0.5 ± 0.5 2.2 ± 0.4 b 0.6 ± 0.6 1.8 ± 0.9 b
Signal intensity ratio
 AMB on PDW
  3 mo 0.99 ± 0.25 1.25 ± 0.45 b 1.00 ± 0.27 1.24 ± 0.42 b
  6 mo 1.22 ± 0.32 1.54 ± 0.50 b 1.23 ± 0.33 1.53 ± 0.54 b
  12 mo 1.21 ± 0.40 1.36 ± 0.32 b 1.22 ± 0.40 1.31 ± 0.35
 AMB on T2W
  3 mo 1.05 ± 0.18 1.22 ± 0.28 b 1.06 ± 0.19 1.19 ± 0.30
  6 mo 1.14 ± 0.22 1.33 ± 0.25 b 1.15 ± 0.23 1.32 ± 0.25 b
  12 mo 1.08 ± 0.24 1.14 ± 0.22 1.08 ± 0.24 1.11 ± 0.22
 PLB on PDW
  3 mo 1.07 ± 0.27 1.38 ± 0.52 b 1.08 ± 0.30 1.38 ± 0.47 b
  6 mo 1.31 ± 0.32 1.70 ± 0.48 b 1.33 ± 0.33 1.65 ± 0.53 b
  12 mo 1.31 ± 0.40 1.56 ± 0.38 b 1.32 ± 0.40 1.50 ± 0.43
 PLB on T2W
  3 mo 1.10 ± 0.23 1.32 ± 0.36 b 1.11 ± 0.25 1.27 ± 0.33 b
  6 mo 1.22 ± 0.27 1.53 ± 0.44 b 1.23 ± 0.29 1.46 ± 0.46 b
  12 mo 1.15 ± 0.29 1.31 ± 0.33 b 1.16 ± 0.30 1.26 ± 0.36

a Data are reported as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. AMB, anteromedial bundle; PDW, proton density weighted; PLB, posterolateral bundle; T2W, T2 weighted.

b Statistically significant difference between patients with and without laxity (P < .05; Mann-Whitney U test).