Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 25;22:572. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03629-8

Table 3.

Students’ perceptions of the feedback quality in 2020 (online feedback given by near peer students compared to 2013 (face to face feedback given by experienced clinical teachers)

Students’ perceptions of the feedback Senior students Online feedback Experienced tutors Face to face feedback
2020 N = 107 2013 N = 64
Mean (SD) Likert 1–5 Mean (SD) Likert 1–5 p valuea
The feedback session was useful 4.75 (0.52) 4.35 (0.93) 0.0022
I improved my history taking skills 4.64 (0.57) 4.07 (1.03)  < 0.001
It improved my physical examination skills 3.36 (1.24) 4.11 (0.99) 0.00012
I improved my communication skills 4.56 (0.73) 4.00 (1.21) 0.00014
The tutor was aware of what I needed to learn 4.83 (0.42) 4.46 (0.86) 0.0006
The tutor made me feel comfortable and confident 4.93 (0.26) 4.25 (1.15)  < 0.0001
The tutor asked me my learning needs 4.23 (1.31) 2.69 (1.82)  < 0.0001
The tutor asked me to evaluate what I did well 4.79 (0.67) 3.91 (1.27)  < 0.0001
The tutor asked me to evaluate what I could improve 4.80 (0.67) 4.31 (1.00)  < 0.0001
The tutor gave me balanced feedback (including both positive and less positive aspects) 4.93 (0.29) 4.38 (0.90)  < 0.0001
The tutor stimulated me to participate to the problem-solving process 4.36 (0.92) 3.17 (1.50)  < 0.0001
The tutor gave me precise and concrete suggestions for improvement 4.71 (0.63) 4.03 (1.25)  < 0.0001
The tutor provided me opportunities to practice parts of the history taking, physical exam or the communication 3.50 (1.46) 2.00 (1.53)  < 0.0001
The tutor asked the simulated patient to give me feedback 4.97 (0.17) 3.92 (1.67)  < 0.0001
The tutor checked my understanding 3.84 (1.37) 2.38 (1.54)  < 0.0001

aWilcoxon rank sum test