Table 3.
Students’ perceptions of the feedback quality in 2020 (online feedback given by near peer students compared to 2013 (face to face feedback given by experienced clinical teachers)
Students’ perceptions of the feedback | Senior students Online feedback | Experienced tutors Face to face feedback | |
---|---|---|---|
2020 N = 107 | 2013 N = 64 | ||
Mean (SD) Likert 1–5 | Mean (SD) Likert 1–5 | p valuea | |
The feedback session was useful | 4.75 (0.52) | 4.35 (0.93) | 0.0022 |
I improved my history taking skills | 4.64 (0.57) | 4.07 (1.03) | < 0.001 |
It improved my physical examination skills | 3.36 (1.24) | 4.11 (0.99) | 0.00012 |
I improved my communication skills | 4.56 (0.73) | 4.00 (1.21) | 0.00014 |
The tutor was aware of what I needed to learn | 4.83 (0.42) | 4.46 (0.86) | 0.0006 |
The tutor made me feel comfortable and confident | 4.93 (0.26) | 4.25 (1.15) | < 0.0001 |
The tutor asked me my learning needs | 4.23 (1.31) | 2.69 (1.82) | < 0.0001 |
The tutor asked me to evaluate what I did well | 4.79 (0.67) | 3.91 (1.27) | < 0.0001 |
The tutor asked me to evaluate what I could improve | 4.80 (0.67) | 4.31 (1.00) | < 0.0001 |
The tutor gave me balanced feedback (including both positive and less positive aspects) | 4.93 (0.29) | 4.38 (0.90) | < 0.0001 |
The tutor stimulated me to participate to the problem-solving process | 4.36 (0.92) | 3.17 (1.50) | < 0.0001 |
The tutor gave me precise and concrete suggestions for improvement | 4.71 (0.63) | 4.03 (1.25) | < 0.0001 |
The tutor provided me opportunities to practice parts of the history taking, physical exam or the communication | 3.50 (1.46) | 2.00 (1.53) | < 0.0001 |
The tutor asked the simulated patient to give me feedback | 4.97 (0.17) | 3.92 (1.67) | < 0.0001 |
The tutor checked my understanding | 3.84 (1.37) | 2.38 (1.54) | < 0.0001 |
aWilcoxon rank sum test