Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 3;29(5):1435–1445. doi: 10.1111/ene.15261

TABLE 5.

Association between muscle strength and gray matter area at intervertebral disc level adjusted for potential risk factors

Model a Outcome Factor Estimate SE t‐value p Value
Model 1 Muscle strength (N): Intercept 267.91 194.24 1.38 0.190
Adj. r 2 = 0.56 p value = 0.002 Neck flexion (segment C2/C3) GM area C2/C3 12.83 4.99 2.57 0.022
Age −4.92 2.41 −2.04 0.061
Sex 33.84 10.49 3.23 0.006
Model 2 Muscle strength (N): Intercept 66.96 127.08 0.53 0.606
Adj. r 2 = 0.32 p value = 0.032 Wrist extension (segment C7) GM area C5/C6 6.82 3.08 2.22 0.043
Age −1.01 1.87 −0.54 0.599
Sex 23.1 8.41 2.75 0.015
Model 3 Muscle strength (N): Intercept 28.47 185.78 0.15 0.882
Adj. r 2 = 0.68 p value = 0.006 Ankle dorsiflexion (segment L5) GM area T max 9.62 2.82 3.41 0.009
Age −0.72 2.80 −0.26 0.804
Sex 15.38 17.33 0.89 0.401

Abbreviations: adj, adjusted; GM, gray matter; N, Newton; SE, standard error.

Based on a post‐mortem study [21] and an in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy persons [10], the intervertebral disc levels C2/C3, C5/C6 and T max project to the spinal cord segments C2/C3, C7 and L5, respectively.

a

Multivariate models resulting from the backward selection procedures using a starting model with age and sex as fixed predictor variables and the spinal cord gray matter area at the given intervertebral disc level along with all patient‐reported outcome (PRO) variables with a Pearson correlation coefficient of |r| > 0.2 in univariate analysis as predictor variables and muscle strength at the respective corresponding myotome as outcome. The following PRO variables were included in the starting models: for neck flexion strength, fatigue, pain and depression; for wrist extension strength, pain; and for ankle dorsiflexion strength, depression.