Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 27;11(7):1272. doi: 10.3390/antiox11071272

Table 4.

The effects of different treatments on sperm count, motility and morphology index, fructose, FSH, LH and testosterone levels, mannosidase activity, and oxidative stress markers.

Control PEE CWE PEE/CWE Dexa Dexa + PEE Dexa + CWE Dexa + PEE/CWE
Sperm Count
(106/mL)
178 ± 8.83 189 ± 5.66 * 163 ± 8.66 169 ± 3.41 206 ± 4.24 * 168 ± 7.07 #,a 185 ± 5.55 #,a 200 ± 1.14 *,#
Morphology Index
(%)
90.0 ± 5.0 92.5 ± 3.5 90.0 ± 0.0 82.5 ± 4.04 75.0 ± 0.0 * 90.9 ± 2.35 # 85.6 ± 7.07 # 85.5 ± 3.5 #
Motility Type
(%)
Progressive 86.65 ± 4.71 90.00 ± 0.00 85.00 ± 4.08 90.00 ± 0.00 47.50 ± 6.45 * 85.00 ± 1.07 #,a 90.75 ± 2.50 # 93.32 ± 2.35 *,#
Non-progressive 13.32 ± 4.01 10.00± 0.00 15.00 ± 4.08 10.00 ± 0.00 52.54 ± 6.45 * 15.00 ± 2.07 #,a 10.00 ± 1.08 #,a 6.65 ± 2.05 *,#
Motility
(%)
1st h 92.0 ± 4.5 90.0 ± 0.00 85.0 ± 7.07 90.0 ± 0.00 45.0 ± 5.77 * 87.0 ± 10.61 # 93.3 ± 2.35 #,a 87.5 ± 2.53 #
2nd h 65.0 ± 8.14 67.5 ± 7.68 50.5 ± 9.85 53.1 ± 7.07 11.7 ± 2.07 * 42.5 ± 10.6 *,# 75.5 ± 13.43 # 72.1 ± 10.60 #
3rd h 5.0 ± 0.5 5.0 ± 0.0 5.0 ± 0.0 4.5 ± 0.4 0.0 + 0.0 * 5.0 ± 0.0 # 5.1 ± 0.0 # 5.5 ± 0.0 #
Serum Fructose level
(mg/dL)
124.34 ± 10.15 145.57 ± 13.96 148.67 ± 4.34* 150.88 ± 8.75 * 85.13 ± 8.799 * 136.73 ± 6.68 # 133.19 ± 10.35 # 143.36 ± 5.01 *,#
Seminal Fructose level
(mg/g tissue)
148.23± 8.59 150.50 ± 8.28 156.08 ± 6.78 163.71 ± 8.23 115.79 ± 7.26 * 145.13 ± 4.09 # 139.38 ± 3.64 # 143.36 ± 4.90 #
α-Mannosidase activity
(U/mg protein)
0.18 ± 0.011 0.17 ± 0.017 0.18 ± 0.014 0.18 ± 0.018 0.13 ± 0.012 * 0.16 ± 0.016 # 0.15 ± 0.030 # 0.17 ± 0.016 #
FSH
(μIU/mL)
49.5 ± 1.80 48.4 ± 1.71 61.6 ± 4.04 * 67.65 ± 2.93 * 11 ± 1.41 * 43.9 ± 3.88 #,a 53.1 ± 2.34 # 50.8 ± 0.93 #
LH
(μIU/mL)
37.17 ± 2.02 38.5 ± 0.99 45.03 ± 2.88 * 44.425 ± 4.49 * 13.67± 2.05 * 27.47 ± 1.6 *,#,a 38.83 ± 1.02 *,# 34.2 ± 1.04 #
Testosterone
(ng/dL)
2.51 ± 0.30 2.19 ± 0.19 2.23 ± 0.30 2.39 ± 0.41 0.91 ± 0.10 * 1.05 ± 0.11* 1.29 ± 0.25 * 1.51 ± 0.17 *,#
MDA
(μmol/mg protein)
0.883 ± 0.19 0.819 ± 0.06 0.654 ± 0.24 0.325 ± 0.05 * 3.064 ± 0.42 * 0.821 ± 0.12 # 0.703 ± 0.15 # 0.726 ± 0.11 #
GSH
(mM/mg protein)
3.83 ± 0.20 3.79 ± 0.18 3.71 ± 0.32 3.99± 0.44 2.11± 0.18 * 3.31 ± 0.25 *,# 3.28 ± 0.13 *,#,a 3.70 ± 0.18 #
GPx activity
(U/mg protein)
4.61 ± 0.31 4.09 ± 0.30 4.38 ± 0.29 4.91 ± 0.24 1.27 ± 0.21 * 3.6 ± 0.24 *,# 3.7 ± 0.2 *,# 3.4 ± 0.17 *,#
GST activity
(U/mg protein)
1.87 ± 0.05 1.80 ± 0.07 1.78 ± 0.06 1.85 ± 0.09 1.0 ± 0.03 * 1.66 ± 0.09 *,# 1.58 ± 0.07 *,#a 1.76 ± 0.09 #

Data are expressed as mean ± SD of six rats. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (* p < 0.05 vs. control group, # p < 0.05 vs. Dexa group, and a p < 0.05 vs. DEXA + PEE + CWE group).