Table 2.
Confirmatory factor analysis result.
Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | RMSEA | RMR | IFI | CFI | NFI | NNFI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1: PL, SSG, UPSB, FM | 2322.203 | 1169 | 1.986 | 0.053 | 0.091 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.822 | 0.898 |
M2: PL + SSG, UPSB, FM | 2838.547 | 1124 | 2.525 | 0.065 | 0.064 | 0.786 | 0.784 | 0.689 | 0.774 |
M3: PL + SSG + UPSB, FM | 3562.115 | 1126 | 3.164 | 0.078 | 0.088 | 0.695 | 0.693 | 0.609 | 0.68 |
M4: PL + SSG + UPSB + FM | 4545.136 | 1127 | 4.033 | 0.092 | 0.081 | 0.572 | 0.57 | 0.502 | 0.551 |
Note: PL refers to paradoxical leadership; SSG refers to supervisor−subordinate Guanxi; UPSB refers to unethical pro-supervisor behavior; FM refers to follower mindfulness.