Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 19;57(3):558–567. doi: 10.1111/jre.12985

TABLE 4.

ROC analysis and diagnostic performance of MMP‐8 analysis methods Biosensor, IFMA and ELISA in classifying between (A) periodontitis and gingivitis versus health; and (B) periodontitis versus health and gingivitis

Periodontitis + Gingivitis vs Health
AUC Cutoff OR Se(%) Sp(%) FN(%) FP(%) Acc(%) MCC
Biosensor 0.808 (0.736–0.881) 1.6 9.8 71.6 79.6 42.6 12.0 74.2 0.48
IFMA 0.782 (0.696–0.867) 347.7 14.2 89.2 63.3 26.2 16.5 80.8 0.55
ELISA 0.857 (0.792–0.922) 187.6 19.5 83.3 79.6 30.4 10.5 82.1 0.61
Periodontitis vs Health + Gingivitis
AUC Cutoff OR Se(%) Sp(%) FN(%) FP(%) Acc(%) MCC
Biosensor 0.857 (0.793–0.920) 2.5 21.4 74.1 88.2 15.5 20.4 82.8 0.63
IFMA 0.720 (0.641–0.800) 378.3 27.4 96.6 49.5 4.2 45.6 67.5 0.48
ELISA 0.832 (0.768–0.896) 386.5 16.2 56.9 92.5 22.5 17.5 78.8 0.54

Cutoff calculated by Youden's index.

Abbreviations: Acc, accuracy; FN, false negatives; FP, false positives; MCC, Matthews correlation coefficient; OR, odds ratio; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity.