TABLE 1.
Data category | Information |
---|---|
Primary registry and trial identifying number | ISRCTN14240288 |
Date of registration in primary registry | 20 October 2016 |
Secondary identifying numbers |
EudraCT 2016‐000862‐49 ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02945566 |
Source(s) of monetary or material support | Cancer Research UK, Dutch Cancer Society, Danish Cancer Society, Against Cancer Flanders |
Primary sponsor |
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK Email: researchgovernance@contacts.bham.ac.uk |
Secondary sponsor(s) | |
Contact for public queries | STAR-TREC@Trials.bham.ac.uk |
Contact for scientific queries | STAR-TREC@Trials.bham.ac.uk |
Public title | Can we Save the rectum by watchful waiting or TransAnal surgery following (chemo)Radiotherapy versus Total mesorectal excision for early REctal Cancer |
Scientific title | Can we Save the rectum by watchful waiting or TransAnal surgery following (chemo)Radiotherapy versus Total mesorectal excision for early REctal Cancer |
Countries of recruitment |
Current: UK, Netherlands, Denmark Future: Belgium, Sweden |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Early rectal cancer |
Intervention(s) |
Randomized comparator: organ preservation with short‐course radiotherapy A total dose of 25 Gy in five daily fractions over a total time of 1 week, using 5 Gy per fraction |
Randomized comparator: organ preservation with long‐course chemoradiotherapy A total dose of 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions over a total time of 5 weeks, using 2.0 Gy per fraction, combined with capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily on radiotherapy days | |
Non‐randomized comparator: radical total mesorectal excision Encompassing reconstructive (low anterior resection) and non‐reconstructive (abdominoperineal excision, low Hartmann's procedure) approaches | |
Key inclusion and exclusion criteria |
Ages eligible for study: ≥16 years in UK, ≥18 years in other countries Sexes eligible for study: both Accepts healthy volunteers: no |
Main inclusion criteria:
| |
Main exclusion criteria:
| |
Study type | Interventional |
Open, parallel assignment, partially randomized intervention model Patients will choose organ preservation or standard surgery. Those who prefer organ preservation will be randomized 1:1 between (i) organ preservation with mesorectal CRT versus (ii) organ preservation with mesorectal SCRT. Those who prefer standard surgery or have no preference will undergo standard TME surgery without neoadjuvant radiotherapy treatment | |
Primary purpose: treatment | |
Rolling phase II–III | |
Date of first enrolment | 14 June 2017 |
Target sample size |
380 patients randomized to the organ preservation arms (CRT and SCRT) Estimated 120 patients recruited to the standard surgery comparator arm |
Recruitment status | Recruiting |
Primary outcome(s) | See Table 3 |
Key secondary outcomes | See Table 3 |
Abbreviations: CRT, chemoradiotherapy; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ERUS, endorectal ultrasound; MDT, multidisciplinary team; SCRT, short‐course radiotherapy; TEM, transanal endoscopic microsurgery; TME, total mesorectal excision.