Table 2.
Health outcomes | Outcome | Population group | Research evidence | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy | Preeclampsia | Pregnant women | Meta‐analysis | Calcium supplementation compared to placebo reduced the risk of preeclampsia, RR = 0.45 (95% CI: 0.31–0.65) 101 |
Pregnant women with low basal calcium intake | Meta‐analysis | Calcium supplementation compared to placebo reduced the risk of preeclampsia, RR = 0.36 (95% CI: 0.20–0.65) 101 | ||
High blood pressure | Pregnant women | Meta‐analysis | Calcium supplementation compared to placebo reduced the high blood pressure RR to 0.65 (95% CI: 0.530.81) 101 | |
Blood pressure | Blood pressure | Normotensive adults | Meta‐analysis | Calcium supplementation reduced SBP in adults by 1.14 mmHg (95% CI: −2.01 to −0.27) with doses of calcium 1000–1500 mg/day and by 2.79 mmHg (95% CI: −4.71 to −0.86) with doses of calcium equal to or over 1500 mg/day. Calcium supplementation had the greatest effect in young adults of less than 35 years as their SBP was reduced by 2.11 mmHg (95% CI: −3.58 to −0.64) 102 |
Blood pressure | Hypertensive adults | Calcium supplementation reduced SBP by −1.86 mmHg (95% CI: −2.91 to −0.81) and DBP by −0.99 mmHg (95% CI: −1.61 to −0.37) 37 | ||
Blood pressure | Hypertensive adults with low basal calcium intake | In people with relatively low calcium intake (≤800 mg/day) calcium supplementation reduced SBP by −2.63 (95% CI: −4.03 to −1.24) and DBP by −1.30 (95% CI: −2.13 to −0.47) 37 | ||
Blood pressure | Hypertensive adults | Calcium supplementation as compared to control induced a statistically significant reduction in SBP (mean difference: −2.5 mmHg, 95% CI: −4.5 to −0.6, I(2)= 42%) but not DBP (mean difference: −0.8 mmHg, 95% CI: −2.1 to 0.4, I(2) = 48%) 103 | ||
Progeny blood pressure | High blood pressure | Pregnant women/children | RCT | Calcium supplementation showed that children whose mothers received calcium supplementation had, at 7 years of age, a reduction in the risk of high blood pressure (above the 90th percentile) in comparison with children whose mothers were in the placebo group (RR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39–0.90) 36 |
Cholesterol | LDL and HDL cholesterol | Adults | Meta‐analysis | Calcium supplementation reduced low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (−0.12 mmol/L (95% CI: −0.22 to −0.02)) and increased high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (0.05 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.00–0.10)) 104 |
Colorectal adenomas | Recurrent colorectal adenomas | Adults with previous adenomas | Meta‐analysis | Calcium supplementation with doses from 1200 to 2000 mg/day and treatment duration from 36 to 60 months reduced the risk of recurrent colorectal adenomas, RR = 0.89 (95%CI: 0.82−0.96) 105 |
Bone health | Bone mineral density | Children | Meta‐analysis | Calcium supplementation had a small effect on total body bone mineral content (standardized mean difference = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.01–0.27) and upper limb bone mineral density (0.14, 95% CI: 0.04–0.24), and this effect persisted after the end of supplementation only in the upper limb (0.14, 95% CI: 0.01–0.28) 106 |
Renal stones | Urolithiasis | Individuals with osteoporosis | Meta‐analysis | Calcium supplementation compared to placebo, RR = 0.66 [95% CI 0.19, 2.34]; five studies in postmenopausal or elderly women, including 2038 subjects 107 |
Urolithiasis | Pregnant women | Meta‐analysis | Calcium supplementation during pregnancy did not increase the risk of urolithiasis, RR = 1.52 [95% CI: 0.06, 40.67] or renal colic, RR = 1.75 [95% CI; 0.51, 5.99] in two studies with 12,901 women 108 |
Note: Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of RCTs. Table taken from Ref. 1, with permission of the authors.
CI, confidence interval; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; RR, relative risk; SBP, systolic blood pressure.