Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 4;11(7):1318. doi: 10.3390/antiox11071318

Table 2.

The average particle size, PDI, ζ-potential, and EE% of different niosomal formulas. All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the results were expressed as means ± standard deviations.

Formula Code Molar Ratio Diameter (nm) PDI Zeta Potential (mV) EE %
Ch S60 T60
N1 2 1 1 388.27 ± 12.23 0.32 ± 0.14 −7.65 ± 2.63 0.90 ± 1.94
N2 2 1.5 1 223.07 ± 8.99 0.31 ± 0.13 −7.57 ± 2.97 17.05 ± 5.23
N3 2 2 1 125.34 ± 13.29 0.24 ± 0.04 −11.34 ± 4.71 87.30 ± 4.95
N4 2 2.5 1 356.38 ± 18.42 0.31 ± 0.08 −6.89 ± 5.78 8.76 ± 9.65
N5 2 3 1 342.66 ± 28.9 0.33 ± 0.11 −1.64 ± 1.44 44.55 ± 3.20