Table A3.

Ordinary two-way oviposition ANOVA analysis and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to evaluate the effect of polymer type and concentration on T/C in the groups CL-HEC2-30 and CL-SA2-30, p > 0.0123 = not significant (ns); p < 0.0001 = ****.

Ordinary Two-Way ANOVA
Alpha	0.05
Source of Variation	% of total variation	p value	p value summary
Interaction	0.5089	0.2648	ns
Concentration	97.71	<0.0001	****
Substrate	0.04771	0.3557	ns
ANOVA table
	SS	DF	MS	F (DFn. DFd)	p value
Interaction	0.02569	7	0.00367	F (7, 32) = 1.339	p = 0.2648
Polymer Concentration	4.932	7	0.7046	F (7, 32) = 257.0	p < 0.0001
Substrate	0.002408	1	0.002408	F (1, 32) = 0.8784	p = 0.3557
Residual	0.08773	32	0.002742
Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
Number of families	2
Number of comparisons per family	28
Alpha	0.05
	Mean Diff.	95% CI of diff.	Summary	Adjusted p Value
CL-HEC
2% vs. 6%	−0.03333	−0.1718 to 0.1052	ns	0.9931
2% vs. 8%	0	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
2% vs. 10%	−0.03333	−0.1718 to 0.1052	ns	0.9931
2% vs. 16%	−0.03333	−0.1718 to 0.1052	ns	0.9931
2% vs. 20%	−0.03333	−0.1718 to 0.1052	ns	0.9931
2% vs. 30%	−0.03333	−0.1718 to 0.1052	ns	0.9931
2% vs. control	−1	−1.138 to −0.8615	****	<0.0001
6% vs. 8%	0.03333	−0.1052 to 0.1718	ns	0.9931
6% vs. 10%	−2.8 × 10−17	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
6% vs. 16%	−5.6 × 10−17	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
6% vs. 20%	0	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
6% vs. 30%	8.33 × 10−17	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
6% vs. control	−0.9667	−1.105 to −0.8282	****	<0.0001
8% vs. 10%	−0.03333	−0.1718 to 0.1052	ns	0.9931
8% vs. 16%	−0.03333	−0.1718 to 0.1052	ns	0.9931
8% vs. 20%	−0.03333	−0.1718 to 0.1052	ns	0.9931
8% vs. 30%	−0.03333	−0.1718 to 0.1052	ns	0.9931
8% vs. control	−1	−1.138 to −0.8615	****	<0.0001
10% vs. 16%	−2.8 × 10−17	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
10% vs. 20%	2.78 × 10−17	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
10% vs. 30%	1.11 × 10−16	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
10% vs. control	−0.9667	−1.105 to −0.8282	****	<0.0001
16% vs. 20%	5.55 × 10−17	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
16% vs. 30%	1.39 × 10−16	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
16% vs. control	−0.9667	−1.105 to −0.8282	****	<0.0001
20% vs. 30%	8.33 × 10−17	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
20% vs. control	−0.9667	−1.105 to −0.8282	****	<0.0001
30% vs. control	−0.9667	−1.105 to −0.8282	****	<0.0001
CL-SA
2% vs. 6%	−0.03667	−0.1752 to 0.1018	ns	0.9878
2% vs. 8%	−0.02	−0.1585 to 0.1185	ns	0.9997
2% vs. 10%	0.06333	−0.07515 to 0.2018	ns	0.8113
2% vs. 16%	0.03	−0.1085 to 0.1685	ns	0.9963
2% vs. 20%	0.06333	−0.07515 to 0.2018	ns	0.8113
2% vs. 30%	0.06333	−0.07515 to 0.2018	ns	0.8113
2% vs. control	−0.9367	−1.075 to −0.7982	****	<0.0001
6% vs. 8%	0.01667	−0.1218 to 0.1552	ns	>0.9999
6% vs. 10%	0.1	−0.03849 to 0.2385	ns	0.3047
6% vs. 16%	0.06667	−0.07182 to 0.2052	ns	0.7698
6% vs. 20%	0.1	−0.03849 to 0.2385	ns	0.3047
6% vs. 30%	0.1	−0.03849 to 0.2385	ns	0.3047
6% vs. control	−0.9	−1.038 to −0.7615	****	<0.0001
8% vs. 10%	0.08333	−0.05515 to 0.2218	ns	0.5295
8% vs. 16%	0.05	−0.08849 to 0.1885	ns	0.9348
8% vs. 20%	0.08333	−0.05515 to 0.2218	ns	0.5295
8% vs. 30%	0.08333	−0.05515 to 0.2218	ns	0.5295
8% vs. control	−0.9167	−1.055 to −0.7782	****	<0.0001
10% vs. 16%	−0.03333	−0.1718 to 0.1052	ns	0.9931
10% vs. 20%	0	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
10% vs. 30%	1.39 × 10−16	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
10% vs. control	−1	−1.138 to −0.8615	****	<0.0001
16% vs. 20%	0.03333	−0.1052 to 0.1718	ns	0.9931
16% vs. 30%	0.03333	−0.1052 to 0.1718	ns	0.9931
16% vs. control	−0.9667	−1.105 to −0.8282	****	<0.0001
20% vs. 30%	1.39 × 10−16	−0.1385 to 0.1385	ns	>0.9999
20% vs. control	−1	−1.138 to −0.8615	****	<0.0001
30% vs. control	−1	−1.138 to −0.8615	****	<0.0001