Table A8.

One-way ANOVA analysis and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to evaluate the effect of Turbidity on T/C. p > 0.0123 = not significant (ns); p < 0.033 = *; p < 0.0021 **; p < 0.0002 ***; p < 0.0001 = ****.

ANOVA Summary
F	80.01
p value	<0.0001
p value summary	****
Significant diff. among means (p < 0.05)?	Yes
R square	0.9717
ANOVA table
	SS	DF	MS	F (DFn. DFd)	p value
Treatment (between columns)	13.22	6	2.204	F (6, 14) = 80.01	p < 0.0001
Residual (within columns)	0.3856	14	0.02754
Total	13.61	20
Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
Number of families	1
Number of comparisons per family	21
Alpha	0.05
	Mean Diff.	95% CI of diff.	Summary	Adjusted p Value
Tb10 vs. Tb8	−0.1333	−0.5960 to 0.3294	ns	0.9496
Tb10 vs. Tb6	0.9333	0.4706 to 1.396	***	0.0001
Tb10 vs. Tb4	1.473	1.011 to 1.936	****	<0.0001
Tb10 vs. Tb2	1.673	1.211 to 2.136	****	<0.0001
Tb10 vs. Tb0 (HEC16)	1.657	1.194 to 2.119	****	<0.0001
Tb10 vs. Control	2.033	1.571 to 2.496	****	<0.0001
Tb8 vs. Tb6	1.067	0.6040 to 1.529	****	<0.0001
Tb8 vs. Tb4	1.607	1.144 to 2.069	****	<0.0001
Tb8 vs. Tb2	1.807	1.344 to 2.269	****	<0.0001
Tb8 vs. Tb0 (HEC16)	1.790	1.327 to 2.253	****	<0.0001
Tb8 vs. Control	2.167	1.704 to 2.629	****	<0.0001
Tb6 vs. Tb4	0.5400	0.07730 to 1.003	*	0.0178
Tb6 vs. Tb2	0.7400	0.2773 to 1.203	**	0.0013
Tb6 vs. Tb0 (HEC16)	0.7233	0.2606 to 1.186	**	0.0016
Tb6 vs. Control	1.100	0.6373 to 1.563	****	<0.0001
Tb4 vs. Tb2	0.2000	−0.2627 to 0.6627	ns	0.7538
Tb4 vs. Tb0 (HEC16)	0.1833	−0.2794 to 0.6460	ns	0.8166
Tb4 vs. Control	0.5600	0.09730 to 1.023	*	0.0136
Tb2 vs. Tb0 (HEC16)	−0.01667	−0.4794 to 0.4460	ns	>0.9999
Tb2 vs. Control	0.3600	−0.1027 to 0.8227	ns	0.1809
Tb0 (HEC16) vs. Control	0.3767	−0.08603 to 0.8394	ns	0.1486