Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 8;9(7):301. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9070301

Table 3.

The relative proportion of work done by joints.

Index Male Female Average
0 cm 1.5 cm 3 cm 0 cm 1.5 cm 3 cm 0 cm 1.5 cm 3 cm
Hip NWR 0.32 ± 0.06 c 0.31 ± 0.07 c 0.25 ± 0.04 ab 0.36 ± 0.08 0.44 ± 0.09 0.40 ± 0.12 0.34 ± 0.07 0.38 ± 0.10 0.35 ± 0.12
PWR 0.38 ± 0.04 c 0.36 ± 0.05 0.32 ± 0.04 a 0.37 ± 0.06 0.44 ± 0.08 0.41 ± 0.10 0.38 ± 0.05 0.40 ± 0.08 0.38 ± 0.09
Knee NWR 0.56 ± 0.08 c 0.57 ± 0.10 0.63 ± 0.06 a 0.54 ± 0.08 0.46 ± 0.10 0.52 ± 0.13 0.55 ± 0.08 0.51 ± 0.11 0.55 ± 0.13
PWR 0.48 ± 0.06 0.50 ± 0.06 0.52 ± 0.05 0.50 ± 0.05 0.45 ± 0.08 0.48 ± 0.09 0.49 ± 0.06 0.47 ± 0.08 0.49 ± 0.08
Ankle NWR 0.12 ± 0.04 0.12 ± 0.03 0.16 ± 0.05 0.09 ± 0.01 c 0.09 ± 0.02 c 0.15 ± 0.05 ab 0.10 ± 0.03 c 0.10 ± 0.03 c 0.15 ± 0.05 ab
PWR 0.14 ± 0.03 c 0.15 ± 0.02 c 0.24 ± 0.03 ab 0.13 ± 0.02 bc 0.11 ± 0.01 ac 0.20 ± 0.04 ab 0.13 ± 0.03 c 0.13 ± 0.02 c 0.21 ± 0.04 ab

When participants are not gender specific: a significant differences with 0 cm, b significant differences with 1.5 cm, c significant differences with 3 cm (NWR, negative work ratio and PWR, positive work ratio). The percentage of work done by the joints was obtained by processing the joint power data.