Table 2.
Comparing experimental results of INN with VLSTM and ULMFiT
| COVID19Senti | GeneralSenti | Senti140 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INN | VLSTM | ULMFiT | INN | VLSTM | ULMFiT | INN | VLSTM | ULMFiT | |
| Accuracy | 0.918 | 0.837 | 0.888 | 0.966 | 0.962 | 0.966 | 0.801 | 0.797 | 0.797 |
| Precision | 0.934 | 0.854 | 0.913 | 0.812 | 0.789 | 0.841 | 0.807 | 0.797 | 0.786 |
| Recall | 0.935 | 0.895 | 0.908 | 0.629 | 0.596 | 0.596 | 0.794 | 0.798 | 0.815 |
| F1 Measure | 0.935 | 0.874 | 0.910 | 0.709 | 0.679 | 0.698 | 0.800 | 0.797 | 0.800 |
| Cohen kappa score | 0.823 | 0.644 | 0.759 | 0.691 | 0.660 | 0.680 | 0.603 | 0.594 | 0.593 |
| Area under curve | 0.911 | 0.817 | 0.880 | 0.809 | 0.792 | 0.794 | 0.801 | 0.797 | 0.797 |
Boldfaced numbers indicate best values.