“The reality is that you will grieve forever. You will not ‘get over’ the loss of a loved one; you will learn to live with it. You will heal and you will rebuild yourself around the loss you have suffered. You will be whole again but you will never be the same. Nor should you be the same nor would you want to.
–Elisabeth Kubler-Ross”
Introduction
Grief is associated with a variety of features and each person may experience it differently. As clinicians, recognizing the limits of normative grief reactions in our patients can be challenging due to the variable and sometimes unfamiliar presentation. However, bolstering our awareness of these limits can greatly improve our clinical care practices. Based on available literature and clinical experience, care of bereaved patients can be distilled into a few main tenants.
This includes psychoeducation about grief itself, prudent diagnostic evaluation of symptoms that are uncharacteristic of grief, monitoring of known comorbidities to grief, and referral to counselling and other supports when indicated.
Background
Case 1
A 55-year-old female with no psychiatric history presents to her primary care provider three weeks after the death of her wife. Since the funeral, she has been having odd experiences at home. She divulges that she feels her late-wife’s presence at times, and has seen her sitting in her usual spot in the living room. She does not feel particularly distressed by the experience itself, yet worries that she might be “going crazy.” She denies associated fluctuations in attention, memory, and alertness, which is corroborated by her family.
Definitions
The Fifth Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) defines bereavement as the state of having lost, through death, someone with whom one had a close relationship.1 It may also present in the context of gradual deterioration of a loved one suffering from a chronic degenerative disease such as dementia.2 Grief often centers around feelings of deprivation and desolation, though can involve a variety of thoughts, feelings, behaviors, and physiologic reactions which are often influenced by a multitude of social, cultural, and individual factors.2 Likewise, duration and intensity of the experience can vary greatly. 2 Nevertheless, it is frequently described as one of the most painful experiences an individual faces during their lifetime.3
Common Grief Reactions
Research in this area describes a number of common grief reactions, including waves of deep sorrow, numbness, disconnectedness, anger, and even transient physical symptoms.4 It is not unusual to dream of deceased loved ones, sense their presence, or have auditory and visual hallucinations of them.5 In fact, World-War-II era scientific literature describes numerous accounts of widows of veterans who had auditory and visual hallucinations of “seeing” their husbands.6,7 This occurred in various countries and was usually perceived as comforting. Sometimes, a sense of connection is maintained by keeping certain beloved objects like clothing, writings, or jewelry.2 Other times, efforts are made to continue their living legacies by taking on their life’s mission or making memorial donations.2
Case 2
A 61-year-old male with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and obesity presents to the emergency department (ED) after being found by his daughter in bed confused and unable to speak. Since his father passed away last week, he has been drinking heavily “to numb the pain.” Basic labs are unremarkable and he is discharged home. His family is told that this is just a reaction to grief. Two days later, he continues to be dysarthric and disoriented. The family brings him back to the ED and requests further workup. Imaging reveals sub-acute stroke and he is admitted to the hospital.
Exceptions to Grief Designation
In grieving patients, certain situations indicate a need for further diagnostic workup and clinical management. First, if criteria for major depressive disorder are met, it should be managed as such.1,4 While grief can appear similar to depression and can function as a trigger for a depressive episode, the two are managed differently.3,4 Second, any patient experiencing acute changes in attention, consciousness, or memory should be evaluated for delirium. Grief, alone, does not cause delirium. As demonstrated by Case 2, knowledge of these principles is important to avoid misattribution of vague or subtle symptomology to grief.
Epidemiology
Prevalence
As currently conceptualized, estimating prevalence rates of normal grief reactions can be challenging given lack of well-validated standardized measurements. Another way of examining this issue involves measurement of “complicated grief.1” Described by DSM-5, this more standardized condition, constitutes grief that is unusually prolonged, intense, disabling, and associated with dysfunctional behaviors, emotions, and thoughts that impede healthy adaptation to loss (Table 1).1 It can be measured using instruments such as the Inventory of Complicated Grief Scale8 or by clinician interview using proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria.1 Available literature suggests that 7% of adults experience complicated grief after loss of a loved one.9,10 Individuals at highest risk are those over age 61, females, Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), and those with lower socioeconomic status.6 Other risk factors include loss of a child, spouse, or young person,8 or loss by unexpected or violent means.11 While useful for epidemiologic purposes, the clinical reliability of this diagnosis remains in question. The DSM-5 considers it to be a condition in need of more research that is not yet appropriate to be used in routine clinical practice.1
Table 1.
DSM-5 Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Persistent Complex Bereavement-Related Disorder
| Criterion A | The individual has experienced the death of a loved one |
| Criterion B | Presence of at least one of the following symptoms, experienced on most days for at least twelve months after the death:
|
| Criterion C | Presence of at least of the following symptoms, experienced on most days for at least 12 months after the death:
|
| Criterion D | The disturbances cause clinically significant distress or impairment |
| Criterion E | The bereavement reaction is out of proportion to or inconsistent with cultural/religious norms |
Comorbidities and Suicide Risk
Grief is known to confer increased risk of a number of psychiatric disorders, including major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, and substance use disorders.3,12 Suicidal ideation is seen in up to 57% of older adults who lost their spouse.13 Bereavement is also known to compromise physical health as well. The sudden intense emotional stress associated with grief, can for example, precipitate stress cardiomyopathy, also known as takotsubo cardiomyopathy or “broken heart syndrome.” This poorly understood condition is believed to be related to transient left ventricular dysfunction, and presents very similarly to acute coronary syndrome, with chest pain, ST-segment elevation and T wave changes on ekg, and moderate troponin elevations.14 Finally, although the mechanisms are not clear, death of a child appears to be associated with an overall increased mortality in grieving mothers.15 It is critical that providers have an awareness of these vulnerabilities and consider screening for mental health symptoms in grieving patients.
“O happy dagger! This is thy sheath; there rust, and let me die.”
– Juliet before she commits suicide, in Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare Act 5 (1597) 16
Understanding and Coping with Grief
This excerpt from William Shakespeare’s beloved tragedy, “Romeo and Juliet,” touches on some of the darkest complexities of grief and loss. In this tale of double suicide, Juliet fakes her death to avoid marrying Paris, the man chosen for her by her parents. Romeo, believing Juliet is dead, ends up killing Paris before taking his own life. Juliet then “happily” stabs herself with Romeo’s dagger. This passage powerfully illustrates the deep suffering, confusion, irrationality, and vulnerability that characterizes bereavement. As clinicians and scientists, we may wonder how to best understand this process and support our bereaved patients.
Stages of Grief Framework
The quote in the introduction is from Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, a Swiss-American psychiatrist who pioneered important and highly influential theories in this realm based upon clinical work with those dying and their loved ones. In her cornerstone work, On Death and Dying (1969), she outlined the stages of grief.17 It emphasized the highly individualized nature of grief while hypothesizing that there are five stages: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.17 Not everyone goes through every stage, and there is no prescribed order.16 Her work aimed to provide a conceptual structure to aid those experiencing grief and to facilitate development of healthy coping strategies.17 Subsequent work on grief has echoed this framework over the past four decades.18,19,20,21 This model continues to be a useful patient education tool that can validate and provide structure to the experiences of many (Table 2).
Table 2.
Kübler-Ross 5 Stages of Grief 16
NOTE: There is no specific order to the stages. Each stage may be experienced more than once or not at all.
| Denial | Avoidance of painful thoughts, emotions, and behaviors related to the loss |
| Disbelief, shock, numbness | |
| Looking for evidence that the loss did not happen | |
| “This can’t be happening to me.” | |
|
| |
| Anger | Recognition that things are different |
| Hostility, anger, guilt | |
| “Why me? What did I do to deserve this?” | |
|
| |
| Bargaining | Struggling to find meaning |
| Internal negotiation, hope that things can still be changed | |
| “I’ll do anything to go back to the way it was before.” | |
|
| |
| Depression | Beginning to face the reality of loss |
| Emptiness, yearning, sorrow | |
| Desire to withdraw socially | |
|
| |
| Acceptance | Accepting reality of the death |
| Learning to live with loss | |
| Reaching out to loved ones | |
Constructive Dealing with Grief
There are no standardized treatment modalities, however some grief therapists provide overarching ways of working through grief. For instance, there are those who believe that problematic grief reactions arise from an inability to find meaning in the loss.22 They recommend a meaning-oriented approach to grieving, which centers on narrative interventions like re-telling the story of the loss, journaling about unforeseen benefits, and enacting imaginary dialogues with the deceased.22 This can be done by patients individually, or with the assistance of a licensed therapist. Interpersonal psychotherapy is another modality which has been shown to be effective in helping patients cope with major life transitions, including grief.1,2 Regardless of grief severity, many patients may benefit from counselling with licensed professionals or a spiritual advisor. Discussing these common therapeutic principles can be important to facilitate this process.
Certain situations may call for additional supports and considerations. For instance, those bereaved by violent or traumatic causes tend to experience more intense and prolonged stages of denial, anger, and depression.22 Parents affected by suicide of a child seem to experience higher levels of guilt and distress compared to death by accident or chronic illness.23,24 College students affected by suicide of a loved one report greater loneliness, isolation behaviors, and survivors guilt than those affected by death by natural causes.25,26 Finally, an astonishing 25% of high school students who lost a close friend to suicide met criteria for clinical depression in the following six months.27 Adolescents, in particular, appear to be at elevated risk of imitating suicidal behaviors in response to suicides in their community or those of public figures publicized by the media.28 These phenomena, known as suicide contagion and clusters, are believed to result in 100–200 deaths annually.28 It follows that patients in these situations may be in need of additional resources and close monitoring by friends, family, and classmates. Research indicates that informal supports, such as support groups, tend to be favored methods in these situations.2,26
Conclusion
Despite the near universal experience of grief and personal loss, caring for bereaved patients can feel like unfamiliar territory for clinicians. Our understanding of grief is constantly evolving, however there are key aspects to be cognizant of (Table 3). This is especially relevant today in the midst of a global pandemic, where the grieving process may be complicated by physical isolation from loved ones and travel restrictions.
Table 3.
Take Home Points
|
Funding Statement
MOJ is supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH R25 MH112473-01).
Footnotes
Madeline O. Jansen, MD, MPH, (left), Elie Abdelnour, MD, and Tahir Rahman, MD, are in the Department of Psychaitry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Disclosure
MOJ is supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH R25 MH112473-01). These funding sources had no role in the study design, implementation, or interpretation of results.
References
- 1.American Psychiatric Association. DSM 5. American Psychiatric Association; 2013. p. 70. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zisook S, Shear K. Grief and bereavement: what psychiatrists need to know. World Psychiatry. 2009;8:67–74. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00217.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Keyes KM, Pratt C, Galea S, McLaughlin KA, Koenen KC, Shear MK. The burden of loss: unexpected death of a loved one and psychiatric disorders across the life course in a national study. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(8):864–871. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13081132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Shear MK, Muldberg S, Periyakoil V. Supporting patients who are bereaved. BMJ. 2017;358:j2854. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Castelnovo A, Cavallotti S, Gambini O, D’Agostino A. Post-bereavement hallucinatory experiences: A critical overview of population and clinical studies. J Affect Disord. 2015;186:266–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Dewi Rees W. The hallucinations of widowhood. Br Med J. 1971;4(5778):37–41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5778.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Olson PR, Suddeth JA, Peterson PJ, Egelhoff C. Hallucinations of widowhood. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:543–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb04619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Meert KL, Donaldson AE, Newth CJ, et al. Complicated grief and associated risk factors among parents following a child’s death in the pediatric intensive care unit. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(11):1045–1051. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kersting A, Brahler E, Glaesmer H, Wagner B. Prevalence of complicated grief in a representative population-based sample. J Affect Disord. 2011;131(1–3):339–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Simon NM. Treating complicated grief. JAMA. 2013;310:416–23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lobb EA, Kristjanson LJ, Aoun SM, Monterosso L, Halkett GK, Davies A. Predictors of complicated grief: a systematic review of empirical studies. Death Stud. 2010;34(8):673–98. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2010.496686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Simon NM, Shear KM, Thompson EH, et al. The prevalence and correlates of psychiatric comorbidity in individuals with complicated grief. Compr Psychiatry. 2007;48(5):395–399. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Szanto K, Prigerson H, Houck P, Ehrenpreis L, Reynolds CF. Suicidal ideation in elderly bereaved: the role of complicated grief. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1997;27:194–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Appiah D, Farias R, Helo D, Appiah L, Olokede OA, Nwabuo CC, Nair N. Association of marital status with takotsubo syndrome (broken heart syndrome) among adults in the United States. World journal of cardiology. 2021 Aug 26;13(8):340. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i8.340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Li J, Precht DH, Mortensen PB, Olsen J. Mortality in parents after death of a child in Denmark: a nationwide follow-up study. The lancet. 2003;361(9355):363–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12387-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Shakespeare W. Romeo and Juliet Act. 5:1597. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kubler-Ross E. On death and dying. New York: Macmillan; 1969. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bowlby J. Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books; 1980. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jacobs S. Pathologic grief: Maladaptations to loss. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parkes CM, Weiss RS. Recovery from bereavement. New York: Basic Books; 1983. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kubler-Ross E, Kessler D. On grief and grieving: Finding the meaning of grief through the five stages of loss. New York: Scribner; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Holland JM, Neimeyer RA. An examination of stage theory of grief among individuals bereaved by natural and violent causes: A meaning-oriented contribution. OMEGA-Journal of death and dying. 2010;61(2):103–120. doi: 10.2190/OM.61.2.b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Murphy SA, Johnson LC, Lohan J. Challenging the myths about parents’ adjustment after the sudden, violent death of a child. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2003;35:359–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00359.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Miles MS, Demi AS. A comparison of guilt in bereaved parents whose children died by suicide, accident, or chronic disease. Omega. 1992;1992;24:203–215. [Google Scholar]
- 25. McIntosh JL, Kelly LD. Survivors’ reactions: Suicide vs. other causes. Crisis. 1992;13:82–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Vessier-Batchen M, Douglas D. Coping and complicated grief in survivors of homicide and suicide decedents. Journal of Forensic Nursing. 2006;2:25–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2006.tb00050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Gould MS, Lake AM, Kleinman M, Galfalvy H, Chowdhury S, Madnick A. Exposure to suicide in high schools: Impact on serious suicidal ideation/behavior, depression, maladaptive coping strategies, and attitudes toward help-seeking. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;15(3):455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Poland S, Lieberman R, Niznik M. Suicide contagion and clusters–Part 1: What school psychologists should know. Communique. 2019;47(5):21–3. [Google Scholar]

