TABLE 4.
Individual ID 1 | Individual ID 2 | Loiselle k (SPAGeDi) | Kinship (VCFtools) | Kinship (ML‐Relate) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CHCAS2 | CHCAS3 | 0.513879 (FS) | FS | FS |
CHBE121 | CHBE122 | 0.512615 (FS) | FS | FS |
DEHD2 | DEHD3 | 0.509926 (FS) | FS | FS |
CHPR1 | CHPR2 | 0.492123 (FS) | FS | FS |
FRMA11 | FRMA9 | 0.473704 (FS) | FS | FS |
CHBE121 | CHBE129 | 0.471598 (FS) | FS | FS |
CHBE122 | CHBE129 | 0.470286 (FS) | FS | FS |
CHNE1 | CHNE5 | 0.453771 (FS) | FS | FS |
FRST10 | FRST1 | 0.445381 (FS) | FS | FS |
CHNE2 | CHNE5 | 0.325529 (FS) | FS | FS |
IPA4 | IPA5 | 0.318006 (FS) | FS | FS |
AAM6 | AAM8 | 0.312713 (FS) | FS | FS |
CHNE2 | CHNE4 | 0.306556 (FS) | FS | FS |
IBA2 | IBA3 | 0.301730 (FS) | FS | FS |
CHNE4 | CHNE5 | 0.286318 (FS) | FS | FS |
FRST1 | FRST4 | 0.194805 (FS) | HS | HS |
FRST4 | FRST9 | 0.188862 (FS) | HS | HS |
FRST10 | FRST4 | 0.179891 (HS) | HS | HS |
FRST1 | FRST9 | 0.165271 (HS) | HS | HS |
CHBA6 | FRSL1 | 0.162914 (HS) | HS | HS |
FRST4 | FRST5 | 0.159820 (HS) | HS | HS |
AAM3 | AAM4 | 0.148871 (HS) | HS | HS |
FRCO3 | FRCO4 | 0.145682 (HS) | HS | HS |
CHNE1 | CHNE2 | 0.136978 (HS) | HS | HS |
FRCO2 | FRCO4 | 0.120723 (HS) | HS | HS |
FRST10 | FRST5 | 0.090178 (UR) | UR | UR |
CHCO11 | CHCO15 | 0.088116 (UR) | UR | UR |
CHCAS1 | CHCAS6 | 0.084865 (UR) | UR | UR |
FRGR7 | FRGR9 | 0.083812 (UR) | UR | UR |
FRGR3 | FRGR8 | 0.082819 (UR) | UR | UR |
IBA3 | IBA5 | 0.079113 (UR) | UR | UR |
CHLU2 | CHLU3 | 0.071667 (UR) | UR | UR |
CHCAS3 | CHCAS8 | 0.065919 (UR) | UR | UR |
CHCO14 | CHCO6 | 0.062289 (UR) | UR | UR |
IC14 | IC7 | 0.061200 (UR) | UR | UR |
FRCO2 | FRCO3 | 0.060119 (UR) | UR | UR |
FRGR2 | FRGR8 | 0.056716 (UR) | UR | UR |
IVA2 | IVA6 | 0.055244 (UR) | UR | UR |
Note: Kinship was determined by three different methods, first using SPAGeDi where pairs of k > 0.1875 are identified as full siblings (FS), those of 0.0938 < k < 0.1875 as half‐siblings (HS) and those k < 0.0938 as unrelated individuals (UR), second using VCFtools (flag ‐relatedness2) based on a relationship inference algorithm and lastly ML‐Relate to run specific hypothesis tests of putative relationships assigned by SPAGeDi. We added to this table the values of 14 randomly selected individuals from the same population and their respective Loiselle K values. Sample information for each individual ID listed is reported in the Appendix S1.