Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 18;2022:5034572. doi: 10.1155/2022/5034572

Table 2.

Post hoc analyses for the primary analysis of skin temperature (infrared thermography) of the posterior trunk.

Mean ± SD Post hoc analyses for between-differences

Time WA MU GI ΔWA vs. MU ΔWA vs. GI ΔMU vs. GI

t0 35.26 ± 1.09 35.13 ± 0.85 35.32 ± 0.62 t (136) = 0.84, P=1.00, d = 0.13 t (136) = −0.46, P=1.00, d = 0.08 t (136) = −1.30, P=1.00, d = 0.26

t1 34.99 ± 0.66 35.66 ± 0.55 34.84 ± 0.48 t (136) = 4.59, P < 0.001, d = 1.10 t (136) = 1.02, P=1.00, d = 0.26 t (136) = 5.62, P < 0.001, d = 1.58

t2 35.37 ± 0.65 35.82 ± 0.49 35.26 ± 0.38 t (136) = 3.04, P=0.042, d = 0.77 t (136) = 0.79, P=1.00, d = 0.22 t (136) = 3.83, P < 0.01, d = 1.28

Post hoc analyses for within-changes

Δt0 vs. t1 t (136) = −1.86, P=0.98, d = 0.30 t (136) = 3.58, P < 0.01, d = 0.73 t (136) = −3.34, P=0.011, d = 0.88

Δt0 vs. t2 t (136) = 0.78, P=1.00, d = 0.13 t (136) = 4.66, P < 0.001, d = 0.98 t (136) = −0.47, P=1.00, d = 0.14

WA, chest compress with warm water only; GI, chest compress with ginger; MU, chest compress with mustard; t0, baseline; t1, postintervention; t2, follow-up; d, Cohen's d effect size. Bold indicates p values <0.05.