Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;63(5):1152–1163. doi: 10.1111/epi.17202

TABLE 3.

Contrasts between parental preferences for seizure detection devices among three subgroups of respondents: parents of a child with learning disability (n = 19), parents with previous SDD use (n = 21), parents of a child with a relative high seizure frequency (n = 25) a

Attributes Levels Learning disability SDD usage High seizure frequency a
Introduction to use After consulting a neurologist ++ ++ =
After a 2‐week test period in a clinical setting −− =
Alert Alarms for major and minor seizures ++ =
Alarms for major seizures, silent notifications for minor seizures = = =
Interface Ability to view measurements at the time of alarm ++ −− −−
Continuous ability to view measurements with option to look back in time = = =
Interaction Video image during an alarm = = =
Continuous video images with sound = +
Continuous video images with sound and the option to talk back via the device = ++ ++
Personalization Personal feedback on right and wrong alarms to adjust the algorithm ++ = =
The device trains itself, without personal interference = ++ =

Abbreviations: −/−−, negative effect on parental preferences with < .05/< .01; +/++, positive effect on parental preferences with < .05/< .01; =, no effect on parental preferences; SDD, seizure detection device.

a

Seizure frequency was labeled as high if the frequency exceeded the median seizure frequency among participants (one seizure/week).