Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 30;31(10):2882–2897. doi: 10.1111/mec.16429

TABLE 1.

Rhodopsin positive selection results based on a CodeML random‐site model comparison (M1a vs. M2a and M7 vs. M8a) and the maximum‐likelihood gene tree. The pairs of models were tested using a Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT) following a χ2 distribution. Values of each site class ω0 , ω1 and ω2 are specified for models M1a and M2a. The shape parameters p and q are specified for models M7 and M8. The value ωp corresponds to the positively selected site class for M8. The proportion of each site class is given in parentheses

Parameter
Model np lnL κ ω0 /p ω1 /q ω2 /ωp Null LRT df p
M1a 3 −5266 2.144 0.001 (91.7%) 1 (8.3%)
M2a 5 −4999 2.702 0.017 (89.9%) 1 (83%) 9.797 (1.7%) M1a 534 2 <.0001
M7 3 −5314 2.377 0.007 0.018
M8 5 −5005 2.807 0.028 0.205 9.548 (2%) M7 618 2 <.0001

Abbreviations: np, number of parameters; lnL, ln likelihood; κ, transition/transversion ratio; Null, null model; df, degrees of freedom.