Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 12;14:951076. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.951076

TABLE 2.

Hierarchical regression explaining variability in delayed episodic memory composite.

Delayed memory composite score Independent variables β t-value F ΔF R 2 ΔR2
Step 1 5.15** 0.09
Age –0.17 –1.74
Sex 0.25 2.63**
Step 2 2.62* 0.18 0.09 0.00
Age –0.16 –1.60
Sex 0.25 2.54**
42/Aβ40 0.06 0.50
P-tau181 0.001 0.01
Step 3 1.86 0.41 0.10 0.01
Age –0.18 –1.74
Sex 0.21 1.89
42/Aβ40 0.05 0.42
P-tau181 –0.01 –0.07
Entorhinal volume –0.05 –0.46
Hippocampal volume –0.08 –0.71
Step 4 2.94** 5.63** 0.20 0.10
Age 0.02 0.17
Sex 0.23 2.16*
42/Aβ40 0.05 0.47
P-tau181 –0.05 –0.47
Entorhinal volume –0.08 –0.73
Hippocampal volume –0.06 –0.55
Fornix RD –0.43 2.93**
Hippocampal cingulum RD 0.31 2.76**
Step 5 2.45** 1.54 0.26 0.06
Age 0.04 0.32
Sex 0.22 1.91
42/Aβ40 0.08 0.66
P-tau181 –0.04 –0.30
Entorhinal volume –0.09 –0.84
Hippocampal volume –0.11 –0.93
Fornix RD –0.53 3.41***
Hippocampal cingulum RD 0.34 2.99**
RS control 0.07 0.60
RS default 0.01 0.12
RS limbic 0.03 0.29
RS dorsal attention 0.13 1.23
RS salience –0.28 2.36*

p < 0.06; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. RD, radial diffusivity; RS, resting state. Bolded values represent statistically significant findings.