Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 12;14:951076. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.951076

TABLE 3.

Stepwise regression explaining variability in delayed episodic memory composite.

Delayed memory composite score Independent variables β t-value F ΔF R 2 ΔR2
Step 1 7.13** 0.07
Sex 0.26 2.67**
Step 2 6.12** 4.83* 0.11 0.04
Sex 0.23 2.48*
Fornix RD –0.21 2.20*
Step 3 7.44*** 9.11** 0.18 0.07
Sex 0.26 2.84**
Fornix RD –0.38 3.54***
Hippocampal cingulum RD 0.33 3.02**
Step 4 6.89*** 4.48* 0.22 0.04
Sex 0.26 2.91**
Fornix RD –0.48 4.16***
Hippocampal cingulum RD 0.35 3.29***
RS salience –0.21 2.12*

Variables entered into model: age, sex, Aβ42/Aβ40, p-tau181, entorhinal volume, hippocampal volume, fornix RD, hippocampal cingulum RD, salience network functional connectivity. RD, radial diffusivity; RS, resting state. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Bolded values represent statistically significant findings.