Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 22;21(3):517–524. doi: 10.2463/mrms.tn.2020-0034

Table 1.

Statistical values for comparisons of tissue volumes between the 0.3- and 3-T scanners

Correlation analysis Bland-Altman results
ICC rp %Bias Ilr dm SE CI LOA rBA
GMV 0.848* 0.868* 1.18 0.698 6.65 33.36 -4.02 to 17.3 -58.74 to 72.04 -0.403*
WMV 0.954* 0.959* 0.58 1.058 -2.52 16.87 -7.92 to 2.87 -35.58 to 30.54 0.328
CSFV 0.901* 0.902* 5.37 0.87 -22.21 34.13 -33.12 to -11.29 -89.11 to 44.69 -0.081
TBV 0.974* 0.975* 0.41 0.924 4.13 24.78 -3.80 to 12.05 -44.45 to 52.70 -0.239
ICV 0.984* 0.984* 1.28 0.955 -18.08 25.97 -26.39 to -9.78 -68.99 to 32.82 -0.167

CI, confidence interval at 95%; CSFV, cerebrospinal fluid volume; dm, mean difference; GMV, gray matter volume; ICC, interclass correlation coefficient; Ilr, inclination of the linear regression line; ICV, intracranial volume. P < .01 was defined as a significant correlation and was represented with an asterisk; LOA, limits of agreement at 95%; rBA, correlation coefficient of Bland-Altman; rp, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; SE, standard error of the mean difference; TBV: total brain volume; WMV, white matter volume.