Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 12;11(14):2067. doi: 10.3390/foods11142067

Table 2.

Proximate composition of lupin flour composites and bread.

Sample Chemical Parameters
Moisture (%) Protein (%) Increase Compared to the WF (%) Lipids (%) Increase Compared to the WF (%) Ash (%) Carbohydrates *
(g/100 g)
Energy Value **
(kcal/ 100 g)
Flour Composites
LF 6.91 ± 0.05 a 30.95 ± 0.94 a - 12.42 ± 0.52 a - 3.67 ± 0.09 a 45.79 418.75
WF 6.76 ± 0.06 a 12.00 ± 0.55 b - 0.32 ± 0.02 b - 0.66 ± 0.02 b 80.10 371.30
WFL10 6.80 ± 0.06 a 13.76 ± 0.58 c 14.67 1.66 ± 0.05 c 418.75 1.32 ± 0.05 c 76.30 375.17
WFL20 6.83 ± 0.05 a 16.04 ± 0.66 d 33.67 2.71 ± 0.07 d 746.875 1.00 ± 0.05 d 73.25 381.56
WFL30 6.90 ± 0.06 a 18.35 ± 0.68 e 52.92 4.02 ± 0.09 e 1156.25 1.33 ± 0.06 c 69.23 386.49
Flour Composites
WB 37.92 ± 0.98 b 7.71 ± 0.09 a - 0.34 ± 0.03 a - 0.73 ± 0.04 a 52.34 243.23
WBL10 36.34 ± 1.71 b 8.72 ± 0.41 b 13.10 0.92 ± 0.01 b 170.59 0.77 ± 0.02 a 52.21 251.99
WBL20 34.64 ± 1.08 b 10.41 ± 0.47 c 35.02 0.94 ± 0.03 b 176.47 1.15 ± 0.05 b 51.73 257.05
WBL30 32.86 ± 1.130 a 12.24 ± 0.35 d 58.75 0.97 ± 0.05 b 185.29 1.34 ± 0.06 c 51.44 263.44

a–d A t-test was used to compare the mean differences registered among samples; data within the same column sharing different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05); * were calculated according to Equations (1) and (2) using the mean values of equation terms.