Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 13;14(14):3397. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143397

Table 5.

Percentages of bacterial types in the oral cavities of OMM-bearing dogs and controls.

Bacteria Species OMM (Mean % ± SD)
(n = 15)
Controls (Mean % ± SD)
(n = 15)
p-Value
Tannerella forsythia 1.71 ± 1.25 0.62 ± 0.62 0.017 *
Porphyromonas cangingivalis + Tannerella forsythia 1.71 ± 1.25 0.62 ± 0.63 0.017 *
Bergeyella zoohelcum 0.63 ± 1.36 4.16 ± 10.86 0.027 *
Porphyromonas canoris 2.33 ± 3.99 4.11 ± 4.78 0.128
Bacteroides pyogenes 3.45 ± 5.21 1.81 ± 4.52 0.180
Filifactor alocis 0.57 ± 1.17 0.8 ± 1.17 0.222
Neisseria shayeganii 1.95 ± 2.95 0.9 ± 1.72 0.310
Capnocytophaga cynodegmi 4.47 ± 15.89 0.89 ± 1.66 0.356
Moraxella sp. 10.36 ± 14.21 12.51 ± 16.69 0.367
Capnocytophaga canimorsus 1.75 ± 5.18 1.84 ± 5.22 0.433
Wolinella succinogenes 1.39 ± 2.21 1.27 ± 1.56 0.482
Fusobacterium nucleatum 5.96 ± 8.98 2.32 ± 2.46 0.549
Porphyromonas cangingivalis 19.15 ± 17.46 14.92 ± 15.86 0.564
Porphyromonas gingivicanis 2.39 ± 2.13 3.12 ± 3.09 0.580
Pasteurella canis 1.6 ± 2.36 0.97 ± 1.61 0.612
Pasteurella dagmatis 1.69 ± 2.06 4.78 ± 12.33 0.712
Porphyromonas gulae 13.32 ± 15.87 9.93 ± 12.84 0.729
Treponema denticola 0.92 ± 0.97 1.17 ± 1.32 0.818
Conchiformibius steedae 3.14 ± 5.43 2.85 ± 4.68 0.907
Fusobacterium russii 10.15 ± 12.22 9.87 ± 12.68 1.000
Campylobacter rectus 2.4 ± 1.54 2.47 ± 1.78 1.000

* indicates that the values are significantly different.