Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: Biomed Environ Sci. 2018 May;31(5):382–388. doi: 10.3967/bes2018.049

Table 4.

Structural Equation Modeling among the Migrant Status, Subjective Well-being, Negative Family Functioning, Sociodemographic Characteristics of Students

Variables Estimate S.E. C.R. P
SWB <--- Migrant Status −0.02 0.01 −1.95 0.051
SWB <--- Academic 0.07 0.01 6.10 < 0.001
SWB <--- NFF −0.60 0.03 −17.72 < 0.001
NFF <--- Family Structure 0.04 0.02 2.96 0.003
NFF <--- Sex 0.04 0.02 2.05 0.041
NFF <--- Academic −0.05 0.01 −6.44 < 0.001
NFF <--- SES −0.04 0.01 −3.55 < 0.001
NFF <--- Age −0.02 0.01 −3.78 < 0.001
Academic <--- Migrant status −0.05 0.03 −2.14 0.032
Academic <--- SES 0.12 0.03 3.61 < 0.001

Note. The model showed an acceptable fit to the data (root mean square error of approximation= 0.07, incremental fit index = 0.75, normed fit index = 0.73, comparative fit index = 0.74). SWB = subjective well-being, NFF = negative family functioning, Academic = Academic performance, SES = socioeconomic status. S.E. = Standard error, C.R. = Critical ratio.