Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Biomater. 2021 Sep 1;135:331–341. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.08.042

Table 1.

Fractional factorial design parameters and response variable data. The parameters tested include pH, ionic strength, PBAE concentration, and siRNA concentration. Ranges were determined based on parameters previously published by our lab. Response variables of PBAE loading, siRNA loading, w/w ratio, and knockdown are reported as the mean and the standard deviation (SD). Cells are colored to depict differences in magnitude. JMP was used to determine Runs 1-8 for the fractional factorial design. Runs 9 – 12 were added as midpoints for pH and polymer concentration to test for non-linearity.

Run pH Ionic
Strength
(mM)
PBAE
Conc.
(mg/mL)
siRNA
Conc.
(μg/mL)
PBAE Loading
(μg/cm)
siRNA Loading
(μg/cm)
w/w ratio Knockdown (%)
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
1 4.5 150 2.0 20 1.18 0.14 0.66 0.08 1.80 0.20 17.88 6.49
2 4.5 150 2.0 30 0.90 0.03 1.30 0.21 0.71 0.11 8.16 3.44
3 4.5 250 0.5 20 0.57 0.05 1.08 0.06 0.53 0.05 10.82 10.19 Response Variables    High
4 4.5 250 0.5 30 0.80 0.02 1.95 0.07 0.41 0.02 9.23 2.39
5 6.0 150 0.5 20 1.55 0.09 1.42 0.23 1.13 0.27 7.54 3.81
6 6.0 150 0.5 30 1.30 0.10 2.17 0.08 0.60 0.05 36.96 17.98
7 6.0 250 2.0 20 0.67 0.10 0.09 0.02 8.62 3.24 0.00 0.00 Low
8 6.0 250 2.0 30 0.89 0.11 0.29 0.01 3.07 0.31 1.04 1.13
9 5.2 150 1.0 20 1.07 0.01 0.89 0.09 1.22 0.13 2.26 1.60
10 5.2 150 1.0 30 1.18 0.11 1.41 0.15 0.85 0.09 2.10 1.49
11 5.2 250 1.0 20 1.41 0.08 0.72 0.11 2.02 0.45 0.34 0.48
12 5.2 250 1.0 30 1.16 0.07 1.34 0.08 0.87 0.05 3.61 2.47