Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 2;14(7):1470. doi: 10.3390/v14071470

Table 2.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and NAbs titers, and proportion of seropositive LTRs at each collection time point.

LTR Participants
Day of Collection Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (BAU/mL) IgG-seropositive LTRs, n (%) NAbs (AU/mL) NAbs-seropositive LTRs, n (%) IgG and/or NAbs Seropositive LTRs, n (%)
Day 0
(n = 49)
2.1 (2.0–2.2) 0 (0.0) 4.3 (3.8–4.7) 1 (2.0) 1 (2.0)
Day 28
(n = 47)
2.7 (1.9–3.8) 1 (2.1) 4.2 (3.9–4.5) 2 (4.2) 3 (6.4)
Day 84
(n = 49)
6.1 (0.7–11.6) 2 (4.0) 6.2 (3.3–9.0) 4 (8.2) 4 (8.2)
Day 112
(n = 44)
12.1 (0.4–23.8) 3 (6.8) 11.7 (2.3–21.0) 5 (11.4) 5 (11.4)
Day 180
(n = 42) a
9.7 (0.6–18.7) 3 (7.2) 6.3 (3.8–8.8) 4 (10.0) 5 (11.9)
Day 210
(n = 32) b
12.8 (0.0–26.4) 3 (9.3) 8.0 (3.7–12.2) 4 (12.9) 4 (12.5)
Day 238
(n = 28)
197.8 (0.0–491.4) * 9 (32.2) 76.6 (0–159.6) # 9 (32.2) 9 (32.2)

IgG titers and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) titers are expressed as mean ± 95% CI. * p < 0.05 for comparison between day 238 vs all timepoints by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn’s test. # p < 0.01 for comparison between day 238 and days 0, 28, and 84 by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn’s test. a Two missing values for NAbs measurement due to insufficient serum volume. b One missing value for NAbs measurement due to insufficient serum volume.