Table 2.
Principal strategies to enhance the proteolytic stability of AMPs.
Terminal modification | N-acylation, C-amidation, formation of N-pyroglutamate and carbohydrate, PEGylation, sialyation. |
Cyclization | Head-to-tail cyclization, head-to-side-chain cyclization, side-chain-to-side-chain cyclization (e.g., disulphide and lanthionine bridge formation). |
Replacement of one or more residues with non-proteinogenic amino acid | D-amino acids, N-methyl-α-amino acids, proteinogenic amino acid derivatives with a rigid structure (e.g., Spi, Tic), β-amino acids, γ-amino acids, α-substituted amino acids, β-substituted α-amino acids, proline analogues. |
Formation of pseudopetides (replacing peptide bonds with other chemical groups) | N-alkylation, carbonyl function substitution with a methylene group, carbonyl-O substitution with a sulfur atom or phosphonamide, NH group substitution with oxygen (depsipeptide), sulfur (thioester) or methylen (ketomethylene). Introduction of a retro-inverso peptide bond, methylene or thiomethylene bond, a –CH2–CH2– bond, or a hydroxyethylene bond. Formation of azapeptides, peptoids and dehydropeptides. |
Elimination of one or more residues | Deletion of amino acid residues which are more susceptible to proteolytic attack. |
Prodrug approach | Introduction of a labile modification, maintaining the peptide structure almost unchanged by means of peptide conjugation with a polymer. |
Use of protease inhibitors | Co-administration of the peptide and a specific enzyme inhibitor. |
Formulation modification | Application of specific drug carriers (liposomes, ethosomes, transferosomes, cubosomes, nanostructured lipid carriers, solid lipid nanoparticles, biopolymers). |