Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 1;9(7):209. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9070209

Table 4.

Clinical and laboratory features of patients by pacing modality at baseline and follow-up.

BiV (n = 13) HBP (n = 25) LBBP (n = 10) p Value—Comparing Groups
NYHA class
Initial median NYHA class 3 3 3 0.175
Nb. in NYHA class 2 1 (7.7%) 2 (8.0%) 4 (40.0%)
Nb. in NYHA class 3 11 (84.6%) 18 (72.0%) 5 (50.0%)
Nb. in NYHA class 4 1 (7.7%) 5 (20.0%) 1 (10.0%)
Follow-up median NYHA class 3 2 2 0.059
Nb. in NYHA class 1 0 5 (20.0%) 4 (40.0%)
Nb. in NYHA class 2 6 (46.2%) 15 (60,0%) 5 (50.0%)
Nb. in NYHA class 3 6 (46.2%) 5 (20.0%) 1 (10.0%)
Nb. in NYHA class 4 1 (7.7%) 0 0
p value: initial vs. follow-up 0.096 <0.001 0.008
Loop diuretics
Initial 7 (53.8%) 17 (63.0%) 7 (70.0%) 0.8
Follow-up 6 (46.2%) 9 (33.3%) 6 (60.0%) 0.403
p value: initial vs. follow-up 0.564 0.014 0.564
NT-proBNP [pg/mL]
Initial 1908 (1215–2825) 2800 (1257–5977) 2689 (1603–5710) 0.339
Follow-up 1856 (1195–2505) 1472 (904–2113) 1632 (861–5028) 0.599
p value: initial vs. follow-up 0.311 0.001 0.047
eGFR [mL/min/1.73 m2]
Initial 58 (51–62) 52 (45–61) 66 (35–84) 0.240
Follow-up 60 (49–66) 67 (55–73) 79 (41–90) 0.214
p value: initial vs. follow-up 0.349 0.001 0.033

BiV: biventricular pacing; HBP: His bundle pacing; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; NYHA: New York Heart Association; NT-proBNP: N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; GFR:glomerular filtration rate.